Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 201 references

Dynamics of Relativistic Binaries in Structured and Stochastic Environments: A Lagrange-Fourier-Hansen Framework

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The Lagrange-Fourier-Hansen framework reduces perturbations on relativistic binaries to resonant spectral projections yielding coupled ODEs for orbital elements.

desk verdict The paper gives a workable reduction of environmental perturbations to coupled ODEs via Hansen-weighted resonant projection, but the stochastic cases lack error bounds or direct tests. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.27526 v1 pith:YAB6P7VO submitted 2026-06-25 gr-qc astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE

Lorenz Zwick , Conor Dyson , Brian C. Seymour , János Takátsy , Johan Samsing This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords relativisticbinariesgravitationalwaveperturbationsorbitalelementsHansencoefficientsresonantdynamicsradiationreactionenvironmentaleffectsLagrange-Fourier-Hansenframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a framework for characterizing how non-vacuum environments perturb the motion of relativistic binaries in the gravitational-wave driven regime. The core idea is to project smooth, structured, and stochastic perturbations onto a resonant spectral basis defined over a rolling averaging window, using weights from Hansen coefficients. This projection generates a system of coupled ordinary differential equations governing the orbital elements, which account for epicycle, apsidal, and nodal resonances as well as radiation reaction. The method supports efficient numerical solution on coarse time grids and applies to both analytical and simulated environmental models. It aims to improve gravitational-wave parameter estimation by enabling realistic environmental effects in waveform templates for eccentric and precessing binaries.

What carries the argument

Resonant spectral projection on a rolling averaging window weighted by Hansen coefficients, which converts environmental perturbations into responses of the orbital elements.

What would settle it

Compare the time evolution of orbital elements from the coupled ODEs against a high-fidelity numerical integration of a binary in a known structured environment like an accretion disk, checking for agreement in resonance capture and inspiral rates.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We develop a general framework to characterize non-vacuum perturbations to relativistic binaries in the gravitational-wave driven regime. The effect of smooth, structured and stochastic perturbations to the binary's motion is reduced to a resonant spectral projection defined on a rolling averaging window, with weights given by Hansen coefficients. This is combined with practical criteria for identifying and evaluating the corresponding dynamical response to perturbations, starting from either analytical models or numerical simulations of binaries in environments. The result is a set of coupled ODEs for the orbital elements that capture epi-cyclic, apsidal and nodal resonances, consistently i

Load-bearing premise

Arbitrary environmental perturbations can be mapped to the resonant spectral projection and resulting ODEs without significant loss of accuracy or requiring case-by-case adjustments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Produces coupled ODEs incorporating radiation reaction feedback for orbital elements.
  • Applicable to compact binaries in variable tidal fields and extreme-mass-ratio inspirals in accretion disks.
  • Enables modeling of environmental effects in GW templates for eccentric and precessing sources.
  • Bridges phenomenological prescriptions with realistic environment models for binary dynamics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If accurate, the framework would permit direct incorporation of numerical environment simulations into analytical GW models without full re-integration.
  • Similar projection techniques might apply to other resonant orbital systems affected by stochastic forces.
  • Testing the ODEs against full N-body or hydrodynamical simulations of specific environments could validate the reduction step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Lagrange-Fourier-Hansen framework that reduces the effects of smooth, structured, and stochastic perturbations on relativistic binaries in the GW-driven regime to a resonant spectral projection on a rolling averaging window, weighted by Hansen coefficients. This yields a closed set of coupled ODEs for the orbital elements that capture epi-cyclic, apsidal, and nodal resonances while incorporating radiation-reaction feedback. The framework is demonstrated on two deterministic cases (variable tidal field; EMRI in an accretion disk) and is proposed as a tool for environmental effects in GW templates for eccentric and precessing binaries.

Significance. If the reduction can be shown to hold with controlled error for stochastic forcing, the framework would provide an efficient, unified approach for incorporating environmental perturbations into GW parameter estimation, bridging phenomenological prescriptions and realistic environmental models.

major comments (2)
  1. [demonstrations (variable tidal field and EMRI in accretion disk)] The central claim requires that arbitrary smooth/structured/stochastic perturbations can be mapped to the resonant Hansen-weighted projection and resulting ODEs without significant loss of accuracy or case-by-case recalibration. The two demonstrations are both deterministic and structured; no quantitative error estimate or comparison between the projected ODE solution and the underlying perturbed trajectory is supplied for genuinely stochastic forcing.
  2. [framework derivation and reduction to ODEs] The reduction implicitly assumes that non-resonant and broadband stochastic components average to zero or are absorbed into the resonant coefficients. No error bounds, convergence analysis, or counterexample tests are provided to delineate when this holds, which is load-bearing for the claim that the method produces faithful coupled ODEs from arbitrary environments.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that the framework starts from either analytical models or numerical simulations, but the manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement of the input data format required for the rolling-window projection.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments correctly identify that the current demonstrations are limited to deterministic cases and that formal error analysis for stochastic forcing is absent. We address each point below and commit to revisions that strengthen the presentation without overstating the existing results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [demonstrations (variable tidal field and EMRI in accretion disk)] The central claim requires that arbitrary smooth/structured/stochastic perturbations can be mapped to the resonant Hansen-weighted projection and resulting ODEs without significant loss of accuracy or case-by-case recalibration. The two demonstrations are both deterministic and structured; no quantitative error estimate or comparison between the projected ODE solution and the underlying perturbed trajectory is supplied for genuinely stochastic forcing.

    Authors: The two demonstrations were chosen to illustrate the framework on concrete, reproducible astrophysical models where direct comparison to the underlying equations of motion is straightforward. The general derivation in Sections 3 and 4 applies the same resonant projection to stochastic perturbations via the rolling-window Fourier-Hansen decomposition. We agree that explicit stochastic validation with quantitative error metrics is missing and would strengthen the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a third demonstration using a stochastic component (e.g., a colored-noise torque in the accretion-disk model) together with direct numerical integration comparisons and reported L2 trajectory errors over the averaging window. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [framework derivation and reduction to ODEs] The reduction implicitly assumes that non-resonant and broadband stochastic components average to zero or are absorbed into the resonant coefficients. No error bounds, convergence analysis, or counterexample tests are provided to delineate when this holds, which is load-bearing for the claim that the method produces faithful coupled ODEs from arbitrary environments.

    Authors: The reduction follows from the orthogonality properties of the Hansen coefficients combined with the finite rolling average, which mathematically suppresses non-resonant Fourier modes. We acknowledge that the manuscript supplies neither rigorous error bounds nor a convergence proof for arbitrary broadband stochastic forcing. We will revise the discussion (new subsection in Section 5) to state the averaging assumptions explicitly, derive a heuristic error estimate based on the window length and the spectral decay of the Hansen coefficients, and include a simple counterexample test that shows the residual when a purely non-resonant stochastic drive is applied. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: derivation uses standard Lagrange planetary equations, Fourier analysis and Hansen coefficients on external inputs

full rationale

The paper presents the Lagrange-Fourier-Hansen framework as a methodological reduction of arbitrary smooth/structured/stochastic perturbations to resonant spectral projections (weighted by Hansen coefficients on a rolling window) that yields coupled ODEs for orbital elements. This reduction is described as starting from independent analytical models or numerical simulations of binaries in environments, with two deterministic demonstrations provided as applications rather than self-referential validations. No equations or claims in the abstract reduce the central result to fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes imported from the authors' prior work; the approach is framed as a unification of established celestial-mechanics tools (Lagrange equations, Hansen coefficients) applied to GW-driven binaries. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamics of Relativistic Binaries in Structured and Stochastic Environments: A Lagrange-Fourier-Hansen Framework." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YAB6P7VO

@misc{pith2026260627526,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamics of Relativistic Binaries in Structured and Stochastic Environments: A Lagrange-Fourier-Hansen Framework},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YAB6P7VO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.27526}
}
read the original abstract

We develop a general framework to characterize non-vacuum perturbations to relativistic binaries in the gravitational-wave (GW) driven regime, for use in GW parameter estimation studies. The effect of smooth, structured and stochastic perturbations to the binary's motion is reduced to a resonant spectral projection defined on a rolling averaging window, with weights given by Hansen coefficients. This is combined with practical criteria for identifying and evaluating the corresponding dynamical response to perturbations, starting from either analytical models or numerical simulations of binaries in environments. The result is a set of coupled ODEs for the orbital elements that capture epi-cyclic, apsidal and nodal resonances, consistently incorporate feedback from radiation reaction and can be solved efficiently on a coarse time grid. We demonstrate the practical application of the framework in two representative astrophysical scenarios: a compact binary in a variable tidal field and an extreme-mass-ratio inspiral in an accretion disk. We propose the Lagrange-Fourier-Hansen framework as a unified tool for modeling environmental effects in GW templates for eccentric and precessing binary sources, and particularly for bridging the gap between phenomenological prescriptions and realistic models of binaries in environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27526 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of the basic elements underlying the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Orbital geometry of an eccentric and inclined binary. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Practical workflow of the LFH framework. The inputs specify the binary initial conditions and the time series of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Illustration of the windowing step for two example orbits and perturbation time series. Top panel: Orbit and tangential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Spectrogram of the tangential acceleration for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Scan of tangential acceleration Fourier amplitudes evaluated at the modes ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Derivative of the relative phase of the tangential acceleration for the modes (1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Illustration of the difference between integration in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Integrated perturbations to the orbital elements for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

201 extracted references · 173 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    We re- quire an efficient method to evaluate the evolution equa- tions for cases where the environmental phase is chang- ing rapidly and the resonances are sharp

    Integration over resonances The final step is to connect the local, window-averaged response to the long-term evolution of the binary. We re- quire an efficient method to evaluate the evolution equa- tions for cases where the environmental phase is chang- ing rapidly and the resonances are sharp. As shown in Appendix A 5, this can be achieved using the st...

  2. [2]

    dry” and “wet

    and their corresponding coherence times are given by the second derivative of this phase in Eq. (37). Figure 7 illustrates the coherency of the relative phase for our two worked examples, where in particular the binary in a tidal field showcases three clear stationary points in the displayed modes. Instead, for our EMRI forcing ex- ample, we observe that ...

    2024

  3. [3]

    VIL53101) and the DNRF Chair program (grant no

    CD acknowledges support by VILLUM Foundation (grant no.VIL37766 and no. VIL53101) and the DNRF Chair program (grant no. DNRF162) by the Danish Na- tional Research Foundation. JS is supported by the Vil- lum Fonden grant No. 29466, and by the ERC Starting Grant no. 101043143 – Black- HoleMergs. LLMs were used for formatting, coding and for ideation. Append...

  4. [4]

    Adiabatic window, precessing carrier orbit, and Lagrange planetary equations Our first task is to identify the response of a relativistic binary to weak environmental perturbations. We work within a local adiabatic time window: Iτ ≡ τ− ∆tW 2 , τ+ ∆tW 2 , T orb ≪∆t W ≪T rr,(A1) whereT orb is a characteristic orbital timescale andT rr is the radiation-react...

  5. [5]

    Fourier–Hansen decomposition of the forcing problem Working within an adiabatic window we introduce a local Fourier decomposition of the projected environmental force: aenv(t)≈ 1 2π Z ∞ −∞ ˜WI(σ) ˜aenv(τ;σ)e iσt dσ,(A17) 18 with local spectral amplitudes: ˜aenv(τ;σ)≡ Z dt′WI(t′)aenv(t′)e −iσt′ dt′,(A18) whereW I denotes an appropriate windowing kernel tha...

  6. [6]

    S0,1 l ˜R −σ(0) l ;τ + C0,1 l +e c ac pc X1,0 l + ac pc C1,1 l ˜S −σ(0) l ;τ # eiψ(0) l (τ) ,(A46) ⟨˙ιp⟩res I ≃ ac 2pc∆tW r pc Gm X l

    Selection of the resonant modes via window averaging The results above are expressed as sums overl-harmonics and integrals over Fourier modes inσ. For any orbital elementx p or its time derivative ˙xp, we define the local average over the adiabatic intervalI τ as: ⟨˙xp⟩I(τ)≡ 1 ∆tW Z Iτ ˙xp(t)dt.(A38) Following the phase linearization of Eq. A35, we substi...

  7. [7]

    Response of the binary’s mean anomaly We now close the system by deriving the perturbation of the intrinsic fast orbital phase, which we take to be the mean anomalyM. The LPE for the mean anomaly is: ˙M= ¯n− 2r ¯na2 R+ p 1−e 2 ˙ω+ cosι ˙Ω ,(A51) The first term describes the Keplerian sweep along the osculating orbit, the second term is a direct radial for...

  8. [8]

    renormalised

    Integration over radiation reaction timescales a. The carrier over radiation reaction timescales Over the radiation-reaction timescaleT rr, the assumption of a conservative carrier orbit fails. Instead, we treat the unperturbed carrier as a dynamical reference trajectory that shrinks and circularizes according to orbit-averaged radiation reaction. The car...

Show all 201 references
  1. [9]

    ODEs a. Final ODEs Collecting the results above, the secular evolution of the physical binary is governed by the following coupled system: ˙p= ˙prr(p, e) +⟨˙pp⟩res I (A76) ˙e= ˙err(p, e) +⟨˙ep⟩res I (A77) ˙ι= ˙ιPN(p, e) +⟨˙ιp⟩res I ,(A78) ˙Ω = ˙ΩPN(p, e) +⟨ ˙Ωp⟩res I ,(A79) ˙ω...

  2. [10]

    Damour and N

    T. Damour and N. Deruelle, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Phys. Th´ eor43, 107 (1985)

    1985

  3. [11]

    Damour, M

    T. Damour, M. Soffel, and C. Xu, Phys. Rev. D43, 3273 (1991)

    1991

  4. [12]

    Jaranowski and G

    P. Jaranowski and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D57, 7274 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9712075 [gr-qc]

    1998 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Jaranowski and G

    P. Jaranowski and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D60, 124003 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9906092 [gr-qc]

    1999 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D59, 084006 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9811091 [gr-qc]

    1999 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Damour, Phys

    T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D64, 124013 (2001), arXiv:gr- qc/0103018 [gr-qc]

    2001

  8. [16]

    Barack, T

    L. Barack, T. Damour, and N. Sago, Phys. Rev. D82, 084036 (2010), arXiv:1008.0935 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Akcay, L

    S. Akcay, L. Barack, T. Damour, and N. Sago, Phys. Rev. D86, 104041 (2012), arXiv:1209.0964 [gr- qc]

    2012 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Y. Pan, A. Buonanno, A. Taracchini, L. E. Kid- der, A. H. Mrou´ e, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, and B. Szil´ agyi, Phys. Rev. D89, 084006 (2014), arXiv:1307.6232 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Ossokineet al., Phys

    S. Ossokineet al., Phys. Rev. D102, 044055 (2020), arXiv:2004.09442 [gr-qc]

    2020

  12. [20]

    T. C. Quinn and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D56, 3381 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9610053 [gr-qc]

    1997 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D55, 3457 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9606018 [gr-qc]

    1997 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Pound, Phys

    A. Pound, Phys. Rev. D81, 024023 (2010), arXiv:0907.5197 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  15. [23]

    van de Meent, Phys

    M. van de Meent, Phys. Rev. D97, 104033 (2018), arXiv:1711.09607 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Wardell, A

    B. Wardell, A. Pound, N. Warburton, J. Miller, L. Durkan, and A. Le Tiec, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 241402 (2023), arXiv:2112.12265 [gr-qc]

    2023

  17. [25]

    Pretorius, Phys

    F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 121101 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0507014 [gr-qc]

    2005 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Ajithet al., Phys

    P. Ajithet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 241101 (2011), arXiv:0909.2867 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  19. [27]

    P¨ urrer, Classical and Quantum Gravity31, 195010 (2014), arXiv:1402.4146 [gr-qc]

    M. P¨ urrer, Classical and Quantum Gravity31, 195010 (2014), arXiv:1402.4146 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Szil´ agyi, J

    B. Szil´ agyi, J. Blackman, A. Buonanno, A. Taracchini, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, T. Chu, L. E. Kidder, and Y. Pan, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 031102 (2015), arXiv:1502.04953 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Class

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  22. [30]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Aber- nathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, and et al., ApJ818, L22 (2016), arXiv:1602.03846 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, and et al., ApJ848, L12 (2017), arXiv:1710.05833 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  24. [32]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Aber- nathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, and et al., Physical Review Letters116, 241103 (2016), arXiv:1606.04855 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. D 102, 043015 (2020), arXiv:2004.08342 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  26. [34]

    Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. X13, 011048 (2023), arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Belczynski, V

    K. Belczynski, V. Kalogera, and T. Bulik, ApJ572, 407 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0111452 [astro-ph]

    2002 arXiv

  28. [36]

    R. M. O’Leary, R. O’Shaughnessy, and F. A. Ra- sio, Phys. Rev. D76, 061504 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0701887 [astro-ph]

    2007

  29. [37]

    Sadowski, K

    A. Sadowski, K. Belczynski, T. Bulik, N. Ivanova, F. A. Rasio, and R. O’Shaughnessy, ApJ676, 1162 (2008), arXiv:0710.0878 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Antonini and F

    F. Antonini and F. A. Rasio, ApJ831, 187 (2016), arXiv:1606.04889 [astro-ph.HE]. 25

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Vitale, R

    S. Vitale, R. Lynch, R. Sturani, and P. Graff, Classical and Quantum Gravity34, 03LT01 (2017), arXiv:1503.04307 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  32. [40]

    B. J. Kavanagh, D. A. Nichols, G. Bertone, and D. Gaggero, Phys. Rev. D102, 083006 (2020), arXiv:2002.12811 [gr-qc]

    2020

  33. [42]

    Zevin, S

    M. Zevin, S. S. Bavera, C. P. L. Berry, V. Kalogera, T. Fragos, P. Marchant, C. L. Rodriguez, F. Antonini, D. E. Holz, and C. Pankow, ApJ910, 152 (2021), arXiv:2011.10057 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  34. [43]

    Kimballet al., Astrophys

    C. Kimballet al., Astrophys. J. Lett.915, L35 (2021), arXiv:2011.05332 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  35. [44]

    Santini, D

    A. Santini, D. Gerosa, R. Cotesta, and E. Berti, Phys. Rev. D108, 083033 (2023), arXiv:2308.12998 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  36. [45]

    S. F. Portegies Zwart and S. L. W. McMillan, ApJ528, L17 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9910061 [astro-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  37. [46]

    W. H. Lee, E. Ramirez-Ruiz, and G. van de Ven, As- trophys. J.720, 953 (2010), arXiv:0909.2884 [astro- ph.HE]

    2010 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Banerjee, H

    S. Banerjee, H. Baumgardt, and P. Kroupa, MNRAS 402, 371 (2010), arXiv:0910.3954 [astro-ph.SR]

    2010 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Tanikawa, MNRAS435, 1358 (2013), arXiv:1307.6268

    A. Tanikawa, MNRAS435, 1358 (2013), arXiv:1307.6268

    2013 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Y.-B. Bae, C. Kim, and H. M. Lee, MNRAS440, 2714 (2014), arXiv:1308.1641 [astro-ph.HE]

    2014 arXiv

  41. [50]

    C. L. Rodriguez, M. Morscher, B. Pattabiraman, S. Chatterjee, C.-J. Haster, and F. A. Rasio, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 051101 (2015), arXiv:1505.00792 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Ramirez-Ruiz, M

    E. Ramirez-Ruiz, M. Trenti, M. MacLeod, L. F. Roberts, W. H. Lee, and M. I. Saladino-Rosas, ApJ802, L22 (2015), arXiv:1410.3467

    2015 arXiv

  43. [52]

    C. L. Rodriguez, S. Chatterjee, and F. A. Rasio, Phys. Rev. D93, 084029 (2016), arXiv:1602.02444 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [53]

    C. L. Rodriguez, C.-J. Haster, S. Chatterjee, V. Kalogera, and F. A. Rasio, ApJ824, L8 (2016), arXiv:1604.04254 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Askar, M

    A. Askar, M. Szkudlarek, D. Gondek-Rosi´ nska, M. Giersz, and T. Bulik, MNRAS464, L36 (2017), arXiv:1608.02520 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [55]

    D. Park, C. Kim, H. M. Lee, Y.-B. Bae, and K. Bel- czynski, MNRAS469, 4665 (2017), arXiv:1703.01568 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Samsing, Phys

    J. Samsing, Phys. Rev. D97, 103014 (2018), arXiv:1711.07452 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Samsing and D

    J. Samsing and D. J. D’Orazio, MNRAS 10.1093/mn- ras/sty2334 (2018), arXiv:1804.06519 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 doi arXiv

  49. [58]

    Samsing, D

    J. Samsing, D. J. D’Orazio, K. Kremer, C. L. Ro- driguez, and A. Askar, Phys. Rev. D101, 123010 (2020), arXiv:1907.11231 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  50. [59]

    A. A. Trani, A. Tanikawa, M. S. Fujii, N. W. C. Leigh, and J. Kumamoto, MNRAS504, 910 (2021), arXiv:2102.01689 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  51. [60]

    S. Naoz, B. Kocsis, A. Loeb, and N. Yunes, ApJ773, 187 (2013), arXiv:1206.4316 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013 arXiv

  52. [61]

    G. Li, S. Naoz, B. Kocsis, and A. Loeb, ApJ785, 116 (2014), arXiv:1310.6044 [astro-ph.EP]

    2014 arXiv

  53. [62]

    Antonini, S

    F. Antonini, S. Chatterjee, C. L. Rodriguez, M. Morscher, B. Pattabiraman, V. Kalogera, and F. A. Rasio, ApJ816, 65 (2016), arXiv:1509.05080

    2016 arXiv

  54. [63]

    J. M. O. Antognini and T. A. Thompson, MNRAS456, 4219 (2016), arXiv:1507.03593 [astro-ph.SR]

    2016 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Silsbee and S

    K. Silsbee and S. Tremaine, ApJ836, 39 (2017), arXiv:1608.07642 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  56. [65]

    Randall and Z.-Z

    L. Randall and Z.-Z. Xianyu, ApJ864, 134 (2018), arXiv:1802.05718 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  57. [66]

    A. S. Hamers and T. A. Thompson, ApJ883, 23 (2019), arXiv:1907.08297 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019

  58. [67]

    Liu and D

    B. Liu and D. Lai, MNRAS502, 2049 (2021), arXiv:2009.10068 [astro-ph.HE]

  59. [68]

    A. A. Trani, S. Rastello, U. N. Di Carlo, F. Santoliq- uido, A. Tanikawa, and M. Mapelli, MNRAS511, 1362 (2022), arXiv:2111.06388 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  60. [69]

    Bartos, B

    I. Bartos, B. Kocsis, Z. Haiman, and S. M´ arka, ApJ 835, 165 (2017), arXiv:1602.03831 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  61. [70]

    N. C. Stone, B. D. Metzger, and Z. Haiman, MNRAS 464, 946 (2017), arXiv:1602.04226

    2017 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Mckernanet al., Astrophys

    B. Mckernanet al., Astrophys. J.866, 66 (2018), arXiv:1702.07818 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Tagawa, Z

    H. Tagawa, Z. Haiman, and B. Kocsis, ApJ898, 25 (2020), arXiv:1912.08218 [astro-ph.GA]

    2020

  64. [73]

    Samsing, I

    J. Samsing, I. Bartos, D. J. D’Orazio, Z. Haiman, B. Kocsis, N. W. C. Leigh, B. Liu, M. E. Pessah, and H. Tagawa, Nature603, 237 (2022), arXiv:2010.09765 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  65. [74]

    A. A. Trani, S. Quaini, and M. Colpi, Astron. As- trophys.683, A135 (2024), arXiv:2312.13281 [astro- ph.HE]

    2024

  66. [75]

    Fabj and J

    G. Fabj and J. Samsing, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2402.16948 (2024)

    2024

  67. [76]

    Amaro-Seoane, J

    P. Amaro-Seoane, J. R. Gair, M. Freitag, M. C. Miller, I. Mandel, C. J. Cutler, and S. Babak, Classi- cal and Quantum Gravity24, R113 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0703495 [astro-ph]

    2007

  68. [77]

    Babak, J

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sop- uerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Pe- titeau, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. D95, 103012 (2017), arXiv:1703.09722 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  69. [78]

    Amaro-Seoaneet al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1702.00786 (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1702.00786 (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    2017 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Bakeret al., inBulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol

    J. Bakeret al., inBulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 51 (2019) p. 77, arXiv:1907.06482 [astro- ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  71. [80]

    P. A. Seoaneet al.(LISA), Living Rev. Rel.26, 2 (2023), arXiv:2203.06016 [gr- qc]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [81]

    Colpiet al.(LISA), LISA Definition Study Report (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Colpiet al.(LISA), LISA Definition Study Report (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  73. [82]

    S. K. Chakrabarti, ApJ411, 610 (1993)

    1993

  74. [83]

    F. D. Ryan, Phys. Rev. D52, 5707 (1995)

    1995

  75. [84]

    Barausse and L

    E. Barausse and L. Rezzolla, Phys. Rev. D77, 104027 (2008), arXiv:0711.4558 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Levin, MNRAS374, 515 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0603583 [astro-ph]

    Y. Levin, MNRAS374, 515 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0603583 [astro-ph]

    2007

  77. [86]

    Kocsis, N

    B. Kocsis, N. Yunes, and A. Loeb, Phys. Rev. D84, 024032 (2011), arXiv:1104.2322 [astro-ph.GA]

    2011 arXiv

  78. [87]

    Barausse, V

    E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D89, 104059 (2014), arXiv:1404.7149 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  79. [88]

    Inayoshi, R

    K. Inayoshi, R. Hirai, T. Kinugawa, and K. Hotokezaka, MNRAS468, 5020 (2017), arXiv:1701.04823 [astro- ph.HE]. 26

    2017 arXiv

  80. [89]

    Meiron, B

    Y. Meiron, B. Kocsis, and A. Loeb, ApJ834, 200 (2017), arXiv:1604.02148 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  81. [90]

    Bonetti, E

    M. Bonetti, E. Barausse, G. Faye, F. Haardt, and A. Sesana, Classical and Quantum Gravity34, 215004 (2017), arXiv:1707.04902 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  82. [91]

    Torres-Orjuela, X

    A. Torres-Orjuela, X. Chen, Z. Cao, P. Amaro-Seoane, and P. Peng, Phys. Rev. D100, 063012 (2019), arXiv:1806.09857 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019

  83. [92]

    Randall and Z.-Z

    L. Randall and Z.-Z. Xianyu, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1902.08604 (2019), arXiv:1902.08604 [astro- ph.HE]

    1902 arXiv

  84. [93]

    Yu and Y

    H. Yu and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 021101 (2021), arXiv:2009.02579 [gr-qc]

    2021

  85. [94]

    Cardoso and A

    V. Cardoso and A. Maselli, A&A644, A147 (2020), arXiv:1909.05870 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  86. [95]

    D. J. D’Orazio and A. Loeb, Phys. Rev. D101, 083031 (2020), arXiv:1910.02966 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  87. [96]

    H. Yu, Y. Wang, B. Seymour, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D104, 103011 (2021), arXiv:2107.14318 [gr-qc]

    2021

  88. [97]

    B. Liu, D. J. D’Orazio, A. Vigna-G´ omez, and J. Sams- ing, Phys. Rev. D106, 123010 (2022), arXiv:2207.10091 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  89. [98]

    Z. Xuan, S. Naoz, and X. Chen, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2210.03129 (2022), arXiv:2210.03129 [astro- ph.HE]

    2022

  90. [99]

    M. Garg, A. Derdzinski, L. Zwick, P. R. Capelo, and L. Mayer, MNRAS517, 1339 (2022), arXiv:2206.05292 [astro-ph.GA]

    2022

  91. [100]

    P. S. Cole, A. Coogan, B. J. Kavanagh, and G. Bertone, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2207.07576 (2022), arXiv:2207.07576 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022

  92. [101]

    R. S. Chandramouli and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D105, 064009 (2022), arXiv:2107.00741 [gr-qc]

    2022

  93. [102]

    Sberna, S

    L. Sberna, S. Babak, S. Marsat, A. Caputo, G. Cusin, A. Toubiana, E. Barausse, C. Caprini, T. Dal Canton, A. Sesana, and N. Tamanini, Phys. Rev. D106, 064056 (2022), arXiv:2205.08550 [gr-qc]

    2022

  94. [103]

    Zwick, P

    L. Zwick, P. R. Capelo, and L. Mayer, MNRAS521, 4645 (2023), arXiv:2209.04060 [gr-qc]

    2023

  95. [104]

    Tiede, D

    C. Tiede, D. J. D’Orazio, L. Zwick, and P. C. Duffell, ApJ964, 46 (2024), arXiv:2312.01805 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  96. [105]

    Dyson, J

    C. Dyson, J. Redondo-Yuste, M. van de Meent, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D109, 104038 (2024), arXiv:2402.07981 [gr-qc]

    2024

  97. [106]

    Destounis, A

    K. Destounis, A. Kulathingal, K. D. Kokkotas, and G. O. Papadopoulos, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2210.09357 (2022), arXiv:2210.09357 [gr-qc]

    2022

  98. [107]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 241103 (2022), arXiv:2210.01133 [gr-qc]

    2022

  99. [108]

    Caputo, L

    A. Caputo, L. Sberna, A. Toubiana, S. Babak, E. Ba- rausse, S. Marsat, and P. Pani, ApJ892, 90 (2020), arXiv:2001.03620 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  100. [109]

    Laeuger, B

    A. Laeuger, B. Seymour, Y. Chen, and H. Yu, arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2310.16799 (2023), arXiv:2310.16799 [gr- qc]

    2023

  101. [112]

    P. Basu, S. Chatterjee, and S. Mondal, MNRAS531, 1506 (2024)

    2024

  102. [113]

    Caneva Santoro, S

    G. Caneva Santoro, S. Roy, R. Vicente, M. Haney, O. J. Piccinni, W. Del Pozzo, and M. Martinez, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 251401 (2024), arXiv:2309.05061 [gr-qc]

    2024

  103. [114]

    Dyson, T

    C. Dyson, T. F. M. Spieksma, R. Brito, M. van de Meent, and S. Dolan, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 211403 (2025), arXiv:2501.09806 [gr-qc]

    2025

  104. [115]

    Maggioreet al.(ET), JCAP03, 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Maggioreet al.(ET), JCAP03, 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

    1912 arXiv

  105. [116]

    Evanset al., arXiv e-prints (2023), arXiv:2306.13745 [astro-ph.IM]

    M. Evanset al., arXiv e-prints (2023), arXiv:2306.13745 [astro-ph.IM]

    2023

  106. [117]

    Cardoso and F

    V. Cardoso and F. Duque, Phys. Rev. D101, 064028 (2020), arXiv:1912.07616 [gr-qc]

    2020

  107. [118]

    Yunes, K

    N. Yunes, K. G. Arun, E. Berti, and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D80, 084001 (2009), arXiv:0906.0313 [gr- qc]

    2009 arXiv

  108. [119]

    A. M. Knee, I. M. Romero-Shaw, P. D. Lasky, J. McIver, and E. Thrane, ApJ936, 172 (2022), arXiv:2207.14346 [gr-qc]

    2022

  109. [120]

    Gamboa, M

    A. Gamboa, M. Khalil, and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. D 112, 044037 (2025), arXiv:2412.12831 [gr-qc]

    2025

  110. [121]

    R. P. Nelson, A&A443, 1067 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0508486 [astro-ph]

    2005

  111. [122]

    Roedig, A

    C. Roedig, A. Sesana, M. Dotti, J. Cuadra, P. Amaro- Seoane, and F. Haardt, A&A545, A127 (2012), arXiv:1202.6063 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  112. [123]

    Zwick, A

    L. Zwick, A. Derdzinski, M. Garg, P. R. Capelo, and L. Mayer, MNRAS511, 6143 (2022), arXiv:2110.09097 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  113. [124]

    O’Neill, D

    D. O’Neill, D. J. D’Orazio, J. Samsing, and M. E. Pessah, ApJ974, 216 (2024), arXiv:2401.16166 [astro- ph.HE]

    2024

  114. [125]

    Zwick, C

    L. Zwick, C. Tiede, A. A. Trani, A. Derdzin- ski, Z. Haiman, D. J. D’Orazio, and J. Samsing, Phys. Rev. D110, 103005 (2024), arXiv:2405.05698 [gr- qc]

    2024

  115. [126]

    Zwick, K

    L. Zwick, K. Hendriks, D. O’Neill, J. Tak´ atsy, P. Kirkeberg, C. Tiede, J. Stegmann, J. Samsing, and D. J. D’Orazio, Phys. Rev. D112, 063005 (2025), arXiv:2506.09140 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  116. [127]

    Copparoni, E

    L. Copparoni, E. Barausse, L. Speri, L. Sberna, and A. Derdzinski, Phys. Rev. D111, 104079 (2025), arXiv:2502.10087 [gr-qc]

    2025

  117. [128]

    M. Garg, L. Mayer, Y. Wu, Y. Ali-Ha¨ ımoud, and D. N. C. Lin, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2604.20971 (2026), arXiv:2604.20971 [astro-ph.GA]

    2026 arXiv

  118. [129]

    P. C. Peters, Physical Review136, 1224 (1964)

    1964

  119. [130]

    Klein, Y

    A. Klein, Y. Boetzel, A. Gopakumar, P. Jetzer, and L. de Vittori, Phys. Rev. D98, 104043 (2018), arXiv:1801.08542 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  120. [131]

    Euler,Theoria motuum planetarum et cometarum : continens methodum facilem determinandi

    L. Euler,Theoria motuum planetarum et cometarum : continens methodum facilem determinandi. : una cum calculo, quo cometæ, qui annis 1680 et ex aliquot ob- servationibus orbitas cum planetarum tum cometarum

  121. [132]

    Itemque ejus, qui nuper est visus, motus verus investigatur(1744)

  122. [133]

    K. F. Gauss,Theoria motvs corporvm coelestivm in sec- tionibvs conicis solem ambientivm.(1809)

  123. [134]

    Poisson and C

    E. Poisson and C. M. Will,Gravity(2014)

    2014

  124. [135]

    Fourier, Annalen der Physik78, 359 (1824)

  125. [136]

    P. A. Hansen, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don Series I6, 229 (1850). 27

  126. [137]

    Blanchet, Living Reviews in Relativity17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    L. Blanchet, Living Reviews in Relativity17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  127. [138]

    C. M. Will and M. Maitra, Phys. Rev. D95, 064003 (2017), arXiv:1611.06931 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  128. [139]

    Gerosa, G

    D. Gerosa, G. Fumagalli, M. Mould, G. Cavallotto, D. P. Monroy, D. Gangardt, and V. De Renzis, Phys. Rev. D 108, 024042 (2023), arXiv:2304.04801 [gr-qc]

    2023

  129. [140]

    Fumagalli and D

    G. Fumagalli and D. Gerosa, Phys. Rev. D108, 124055 (2023), arXiv:2310.16893 [gr-qc]

    2023

  130. [141]

    Cutler and ´E

    C. Cutler and ´E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D49, 2658 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9402014 [gr-qc]

    1994 arXiv

  131. [142]

    Tak´ atsy, L

    J. Tak´ atsy, L. Zwick, K. Hendriks, P. Saini, G. Fabj, and J. Samsing, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2505.09513 (2025), arXiv:2505.09513 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  132. [143]

    Derdzinski, D

    A. Derdzinski, D. D’Orazio, P. Duffell, Z. Haiman, and A. MacFadyen, MNRAS501, 3540 (2021), arXiv:2005.11333 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  133. [144]

    Einstein, L

    A. Einstein, L. Infeld, and B. Hoffmann, Annals of Mathematics39, 65 (1938)

    1938

  134. [145]

    R. B. Blackman and J. W. Tukey, Bell Labs Technical Journal37, 485 (1958)

    1958

  135. [146]

    Samsing, K

    J. Samsing, K. Hendriks, L. Zwick, D. J. D’Orazio, and B. Liu, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2403.05625 (2024), arXiv:2403.05625 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  136. [147]

    Hendriks, D

    K. Hendriks, D. Atallah, M. Martinez, M. Zevin, L. Zwick, A. A. Trani, P. Saini, J. Tak´ atsy, and J. Samsing, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.08572 (2024), arXiv:2411.08572 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  137. [148]

    Hendriks, L

    K. Hendriks, L. Zwick, and J. Samsing, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.04603 (2024), arXiv:2408.04603 [gr-qc]

    2024

  138. [149]

    Robson, N

    T. Robson, N. J. Cornish, N. Tamanini, and S. Toonen, Phys. Rev. D98, 064012 (2018), arXiv:1806.00500 [gr- qc]

    2018 arXiv

  139. [150]

    B. Liu, D. J. Mu˜ noz, and D. Lai, MNRAS447, 747 (2015), arXiv:1409.6717 [astro-ph.EP]

    2015 arXiv

  140. [151]

    Toubianaet al., Phys

    A. Toubianaet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 101105 (2021), arXiv:2010.06056 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  141. [152]

    Martin Barandiaran, S

    M. Martin Barandiaran, S. Kuroyanagi, and S. Nesseris, Classical and Quantum Gravity41, 095002 (2024), arXiv:2309.15510 [gr-qc]

    2024

  142. [153]

    von Zeipel, Astronomische Nachrichten183, 345 (1910)

    H. von Zeipel, Astronomische Nachrichten183, 345 (1910)

    1910

  143. [154]

    Kozai, AJ67, 591 (1962)

    Y. Kozai, AJ67, 591 (1962)

    1962

  144. [155]

    M. L. Lidov, Planet. Space Sci.9, 719 (1962)

    1962

  145. [156]

    Gupta, H

    P. Gupta, H. Suzuki, H. Okawa, and K.-i. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D101, 104053 (2020), arXiv:1911.11318 [gr- qc]

    2020

  146. [157]

    Camilloni, G

    F. Camilloni, G. Grignani, T. Harmark, M. Orselli, and D. Pica, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2310.06894 (2023), arXiv:2310.06894 [gr-qc]

    2023

  147. [158]

    Cocco, G

    M. Cocco, G. Grignani, T. Harmark, M. Orselli, and D. Pica, Phys. Rev. D112, 044010 (2025), arXiv:2505.15901 [gr-qc]

    2025

  148. [159]

    Zwick, J

    L. Zwick, J. Tak´ atsy, P. Saini, K. Hendriks, J. Sam- sing, C. Tiede, C. Rowan, and A. A. Trani, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.24084 (2025), arXiv:2503.24084 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  149. [160]

    Zwick, K

    L. Zwick, K. Hendriks, P. Saini, J. Tak´ atsy, C. Rowan, J. Samsing, and J. Stegmann, Environmental effects in stellar mass gravitational wave sources II: Joint detec- tions of eccentricity and phase shifts in binary sub- populations (2025), arXiv:2511.04540 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  150. [161]

    L. J. Dai, S. V. Fuerst, and R. Blandford, MNRAS402, 1614 (2010), arXiv:0906.0800 [astro-ph.HE]

    2010 arXiv

  151. [162]

    D. J. D’Orazio and M. Charisi (2023) arXiv:2310.16896 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  152. [163]

    D. J. D’Orazio, P. C. Duffell, and C. Tiede, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2403.05629 (2024), arXiv:2403.05629 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  153. [164]

    Whitehead, C

    H. Whitehead, C. Rowan, T. Boekholt, and B. Koc- sis, MNRAS531, 4656 (2024), arXiv:2309.11561 [astro- ph.GA]

    2024

  154. [165]

    Rowan, T

    C. Rowan, T. Boekholt, B. Kocsis, and Z. Haiman, MN- RAS524, 2770 (2023), arXiv:2212.06133 [astro-ph.GA]

    2023

  155. [166]

    Tiede, J

    C. Tiede, J. Zrake, A. MacFadyen, and Z. Haiman, ApJ 900, 43 (2020), arXiv:2005.09555 [astro-ph.GA]

    2020

  156. [167]

    Alexander and C

    T. Alexander and C. Hopman, ApJ590, L29 (2003)

    2003

  157. [168]

    Z. Pan, Z. Lyu, and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. D104, 063007 (2021), arXiv:2104.01208 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  158. [169]

    Derdzinski and L

    A. Derdzinski and L. Mayer, MNRAS521, 4522 (2023), arXiv:2205.10382 [astro-ph.GA]

    2023

  159. [170]

    L. Xue, Z. Haiman, H. Tagawa, and I. Bartos, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2605.29305 (2026), arXiv:2605.29305 [astro-ph.HE]

    2026 arXiv

  160. [171]

    Miniuttiet al., Nature573, 381 (2019), arXiv:1909.04693 [astro-ph.HE]

    G. Miniuttiet al., Nature573, 381 (2019), arXiv:1909.04693 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019

  161. [172]

    Arcodiaet al., Nature592, 704 (2021), arXiv:2104.13388 [astro-ph.HE]

    R. Arcodiaet al., Nature592, 704 (2021), arXiv:2104.13388 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  162. [173]

    Linial and B

    I. Linial and B. D. Metzger, ApJ957, 34 (2023), arXiv:2303.16231 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  163. [174]

    Franchini, M

    A. Franchini, M. Bonetti, A. Lupi, G. Miniutti, E. Bor- tolas, M. Giustini, M. Dotti, A. Sesana, R. Arcodia, and T. Ryu, A&A675, A100 (2023), arXiv:2304.00775 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  164. [175]

    Duque, S

    F. Duque, S. Kejriwal, L. Sberna, L. Speri, and J. Gair, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.03436 (2024), arXiv:2411.03436 [gr-qc]

    2024

  165. [176]

    Coogan, G

    A. Coogan, G. Bertone, D. Gaggero, B. J. Kavanagh, and D. A. Nichols, Phys. Rev. D105, 043009 (2022), arXiv:2108.04154 [gr-qc]

    2022

  166. [177]

    Boudon, P

    A. Boudon, P. Brax, P. Valageas, and L. K. Wong, Phys. Rev. D109, 043504 (2024), arXiv:2305.18540 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  167. [178]

    Vicente, T

    R. Vicente, T. K. Karydas, and G. Bertone, arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2505.09715 (2025), arXiv:2505.09715 [gr- qc]

    2025

  168. [179]

    Q.-X. Xu, R. Brito, R. Della Monica, R. Vicente, and C. Yuan, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2605.03756 (2026), arXiv:2605.03756 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  169. [180]

    Q.-X. Xu, R. Brito, R. Della Monica, R. Vicente, and C. Yuan, Relativistic effects in extreme-mass-ratio inspi- rals within scalar clouds: Eccentric and inclined orbits (2026), arXiv:2606.21439 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  170. [181]

    Brito and S

    R. Brito and S. Shah, Physical Review D108, 10.1103/physrevd.108.084019 (2023)

    2023 doi

  171. [182]

    D. Li, C. Weller, P. Bourg, M. LaHaye, N. Yunes, and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. D112, 084057 (2025), arXiv:2507.02045 [gr-qc]

    2025

  172. [183]

    Keijzer, S

    R. Keijzer, S. Maenaut, H. Inchausp´ e, and T. Hertog, Relativistic signatures of scalar dark matter in extreme- mass-ratio inspirals (2026), arXiv:2604.11893 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  173. [184]

    B. C. Seymour and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 011401 (2026), arXiv:2411.13714 [gr-qc]

    2026

  174. [185]

    B. C. Seymour, J. Golomb, and Y. Chen, Inspiral tests of general relativity and waveform geometry (2026), arXiv:2602.17524 [gr-qc]. 28

    2026

  175. [186]

    D. J. D’Orazio and P. C. Duffell, ApJ914, L21 (2021), arXiv:2103.09251 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  176. [187]

    A. J. Dittmann, G. Ryan, and M. C. Miller, ApJ949, L30 (2023), arXiv:2303.16204 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  177. [188]

    A. J. Dittmann, G. Ryan, and L. Combi, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2512.11954 (2025), arXiv:2512.11954 [astro- ph.GA]

    2025

  178. [189]

    Hegade K

    A. Hegade K. R., C. F. Gammie, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D112, 124068 (2025), arXiv:2510.03564 [gr-qc]

    2025

  179. [190]

    Duque, L

    F. Duque, L. Sberna, A. Spiers, and R. Vicente, arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2510.02433 (2025), arXiv:2510.02433 [gr- qc]

    2025

  180. [191]

    Dyson and D

    C. Dyson and D. J. D’Orazio, Spiral Density Waves and Torque Balance in the Kerr Geometry (2026), arXiv:2601.19123 [gr-qc]

    2026

  181. [192]

    Memmesheimer, A

    R.-M. Memmesheimer, A. Gopakumar, and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D70, 104011 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407049 [gr-qc]

    2004 arXiv

  182. [193]

    Lynch, V

    P. Lynch, V. Witzany, M. van de Meent, and N. Warburton, Class. Quant. Grav.41, 225002 (2024), arXiv:2405.21072 [gr-qc]

    2024

  183. [194]

    Brink, M

    J. Brink, M. Geyer, and T. Hinderer, Phys. Rev. D91, 083001 (2015), arXiv:1501.07728 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  184. [195]

    ´E. E. Flanagan, S. A. Hughes, and U. Ruangsri, Phys. Rev. D89, 084028 (2014), arXiv:1208.3906 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  185. [196]

    van de Meent, Phys

    M. van de Meent, Phys. Rev. D89, 084033 (2014), arXiv:1311.4457 [gr-qc]

    2014

  186. [197]

    H. Yang, B. Bonga, Z. Peng, and G. Li, Phys. Rev. D 100, 124056 (2019), arXiv:1910.07337 [gr-qc]

    2019

  187. [198]

    Bonga, H

    B. Bonga, H. Yang, and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 101103 (2019), arXiv:1905.00030 [gr-qc]

    2019

  188. [199]

    Gupta, B

    P. Gupta, B. Bonga, A. J. K. Chua, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D104, 044056 (2021), arXiv:2104.03422 [gr- qc]

    2021

  189. [200]

    Gupta, L

    P. Gupta, L. Speri, B. Bonga, A. J. K. Chua, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D106, 104001 (2022), arXiv:2205.04808 [gr-qc]

    2022

  190. [201]

    Dyson, A

    C. Dyson, A. Pound, D. D’Orazio, M. van de Meent, and L. Zwick, A Relativistic Third Law for Asymmetric Binaries in Environments, (in prep)

  191. [202]

    Lewis, T

    J. Lewis, T. Kakehi, A. Pound, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D113, 064046 (2026), arXiv:2507.08081 [gr-qc]

    2026

  192. [203]

    Mathews and A

    J. Mathews and A. Pound, Phys. Rev. D112, 104078 (2025), arXiv:2501.01413 [gr-qc]

    2025

  193. [204]

    Luoet al.(TianQin), Class

    J. Luoet al.(TianQin), Class. Quant. Grav.33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.