pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20465 · v1 · pith:Z6AR74BZnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 💻 cs.HC

Art Card Game (ACG): Embedding Illustration in Gameplay to Mitigate Artist Self-Criticism

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 06:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords self-criticismillustrationgameplaycreativity support toolsevaluative off-centeringartist well-beinghuman-computer interaction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Embedding illustration in a card battle game raises artists' pride in their work and enjoyment of the task compared to drawing alone under the same constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes evaluative off-centering as a way to reduce harsh self-criticism during illustration by shifting evaluation into a different activity, here a multiplayer card customization game. Traditional approaches like compassion training happen outside the creative workflow and require extra time and skill. In a randomized study, artists using the Art Card Game reported significantly higher pride in their finished illustrations and greater enjoyment of the activity than artists who illustrated under identical rules but without gameplay or opponents. These positive affect states are presented as linked to lower self-criticism. The work suggests this mechanism could be built into other creativity support tools so that self-evaluation is redirected without leaving the workflow.

Core claim

Evaluative off-centering, instantiated as the Art Card Game, redirects self-critical evaluation away from illustration by making the drawings into playable assets in a head-to-head card battle. In a four-day randomized controlled study with 38 hobbyist and professional illustrators, participants using ACG produced artwork with significantly higher reported pride and reported significantly higher activity enjoyment than participants in a control condition that used the same illustration constraints but lacked multiplayer, gameplay, and evaluative off-centering mechanisms. Pride and enjoyment are treated as positive affect states that help explain reduced self-criticism.

What carries the argument

Evaluative off-centering: a mechanism that redirects self-critical evaluation away from an inherently self-evaluative task by embedding it inside an alternative activity such as a competitive card game.

If this is right

  • Artists experience higher pride in completed illustrations when the work is embedded in multiplayer gameplay rather than performed in isolation under the same constraints.
  • Enjoyment of illustration tasks increases when the output becomes a competitive asset in a card game.
  • Creativity support tools can apply evaluative off-centering across domains by turning solitary creative work into elements of a larger shared activity.
  • In-workflow interventions that redirect evaluation may reduce the need for separate psychotherapeutic sessions outside the creative process.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same off-centering approach could be adapted to writing or music composition by turning drafts or compositions into elements of a competitive game.
  • Longer deployments might show whether repeated use reduces artist burnout or improves persistence on projects.
  • Designers of future tools could test whether the multiplayer element or the competitive framing is the more active ingredient.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that measured increases in pride and enjoyment correspond to actual reductions in self-criticism through their established link as positive affect states, without reporting direct measures of self-criticism.

What would settle it

A follow-up experiment that directly measures self-criticism (for example via validated scales administered before and after the activity) and finds no difference between the game condition and the identical-constraint control condition would falsify the proposed link.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20465 by Catherine Mullings, Michael S. Bernstein.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: We present an illustration game, Art Card Game (“ACG”), where players create and draw character cards as they play a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Player journey in ACG. In phase one, the player setups their custom card, which includes picking the character [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Examples of participant artwork from ACG. Each row (a different artist) shows the same character redrawn across three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Examples of participant artwork from Art Card Game (left column) and the control (right column) conditions. Each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Descriptive distributions of 1–7 Likert responses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Persistent self-criticism--harsh evaluative self-talk--can undermine illustrators' performance and well-being. Traditional interventions draw on psychotherapeutic approaches (e.g., compassion training) but sit outside the illustration workflow, requiring time, facilitation, and skill transfer. We propose an in-workflow alternative: evaluative off-centering, a mechanism redirecting self-critical evaluation away from an inherently self-evaluative task (like illustration) by embedding it in an alternative activity. We instantiate evaluative off-centering in Art Card Game (ACG) that integrates illustration into a card customization game: players illustrate cards that become playable assets in a head-to-head battle. In a four-day randomized controlled study with hobbyist and professional illustrators (N=38), ACG outperformed a control condition with identical illustration constraints but no evaluative off-centering mechanisms (e.g. multiplayer, gameplay), yielding significantly higher pride in produced artwork and activity enjoyment. Pride and enjoyment--positive affect states linked to lower self-criticism--help explain how ACG reduces self-criticism. We discuss design implications for creativity support tools that apply evaluative off-centering across creative domains.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes evaluative off-centering as a mechanism to mitigate persistent self-criticism in illustrators by embedding illustration tasks into a multiplayer card customization game (Art Card Game, ACG). It reports a four-day randomized controlled study (N=38 hobbyist and professional illustrators) in which ACG produced significantly higher pride in produced artwork and activity enjoyment than a control condition with identical illustration constraints but lacking gameplay and multiplayer elements. The authors argue that these positive affect states are linked to lower self-criticism and thereby explain the mitigation effect of ACG.

Significance. If the core findings hold, the work offers a novel in-workflow approach to creativity support that integrates psychological benefits directly into artistic practice rather than relying on separate therapeutic interventions. The randomized controlled design and comparison to a matched control strengthen the case for gameplay-based off-centering as a practical mechanism, with potential extensions to other creative domains in HCI.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and Results] Abstract and Results: The central claim that ACG mitigates self-criticism rests on the inference that higher pride and enjoyment (positive affect states) produce lower self-criticism. No direct pre/post measures of self-criticism using a validated instrument (e.g., Self-Criticism subscale of the Forms of Self-Criticizing and Self-Reassuring Scale) are described. This untested link is load-bearing for the paper's primary contribution and requires either additional data collection/analysis or explicit reframing as an indirect effect with supporting citations.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces 'evaluative off-centering' without a concise operational definition; a brief parenthetical or footnote would aid readers new to the concept.
  2. [Results] Effect sizes, exact statistical tests, and confidence intervals for the reported significant differences in pride and enjoyment are not mentioned in the summary of results; adding these would improve interpretability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback, which highlights an important aspect of our central claim. We address the concern regarding the measurement and framing of self-criticism mitigation below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and Results] Abstract and Results: The central claim that ACG mitigates self-criticism rests on the inference that higher pride and enjoyment (positive affect states) produce lower self-criticism. No direct pre/post measures of self-criticism using a validated instrument (e.g., Self-Criticism subscale of the Forms of Self-Criticizing and Self-Reassuring Scale) are described. This untested link is load-bearing for the paper's primary contribution and requires either additional data collection/analysis or explicit reframing as an indirect effect with supporting citations.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would be strengthened by direct pre/post measurement of self-criticism with a validated instrument such as the Self-Criticism subscale of the Forms of Self-Criticizing and Self-Reassuring Scale. Our four-day study was designed to evaluate the immediate effects of evaluative off-centering on pride in artwork and activity enjoyment as observable outcomes of the proposed mechanism, drawing on prior work linking these positive affect states to reduced self-criticism. We did not collect direct self-criticism scores to keep participant burden low during the multi-day protocol with working illustrators. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly reframe the primary contribution as demonstrating an indirect pathway: evaluative off-centering increases pride and enjoyment, which prior literature associates with lower self-criticism. We will add supporting citations from the self-criticism and positive-affect literatures to ground this inference. This change accurately reflects the scope of the empirical data while clarifying the theoretical claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in empirical RCT results

full rationale

The paper reports an empirical randomized controlled study (N=38) directly comparing ACG gameplay to a control condition with matched illustration constraints but without multiplayer or evaluative off-centering elements. Primary outcomes are measured pride in artwork and activity enjoyment, with statistically significant advantages for ACG. The link from these positive affect states to reduced self-criticism is presented as an explanatory inference drawn from established psychological associations rather than any internal derivation, fitted parameter, or self-referential definition. No equations, predictions from subsets of data, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the reported chain; the experimental design and direct measurements stand independently of the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The report is based only on the provided abstract, so the ledger reflects only explicitly mentioned elements. Full paper may include additional parameters or assumptions from the study design.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Pride and enjoyment are positive affect states linked to lower self-criticism.
    Used to explain how the game reduces self-criticism.
invented entities (1)
  • evaluative off-centering no independent evidence
    purpose: A mechanism to redirect self-critical evaluation from the illustration task by embedding it in gameplay.
    Newly proposed in this work to address limitations of traditional interventions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5734 in / 1325 out tokens · 54107 ms · 2026-05-21T06:44:16.005738+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2012.ZRX - Transform your workout into adventure!Six to Start

    Naomi Alderman. 2012.ZRX - Transform your workout into adventure!Six to Start. Retrieved January 27, 2026 from https://zrx.app/

  2. [2]

    Rasim Basak. 2012. Perfectionist Attitudes of Artistically Talented Students in the Art Classroom.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences46 (2012), 5010–

  3. [3]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.377 4th WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES (WCES-2012) 02-05 February 2012 Barcelona, Spain

  4. [4]

    Jekaterina Belakova and Wendy E. Mackay. 2021. SonAmi: A Tangible Creativity Support Tool for Productive Procrastination. InProceedings of the 13th Conference on Creativity and Cognition(Virtual Event, Italy)(C&C ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 10 pages. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/3450741.3465250

  5. [5]

    2020.Fundamentals of Character Design: How to Create Engaging Characters for Illustration, Animation & Visual Development

    Randy Bishop, Sweeney Boo, Crus Meybis R., and Luis Gadea. 2020.Fundamentals of Character Design: How to Create Engaging Characters for Illustration, Animation & Visual Development. 3dtotal Publishing, USA

  6. [6]

    2025.Playing Karaoke: A Lived Experience of Play as Method

    Jeffrey S Bryan. 2025.Playing Karaoke: A Lived Experience of Play as Method. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of California, Irvine

  7. [7]

    Kristin Carlson and Thecla Schiphorst. 2013. Designing interaction for designers: defamiliarization in user’s creative decision-making. InProceedings of the 9th Art Card Game (ACG): Embedding Illustration in Gameplay to Mitigate Artist Self-Criticism Conference acronym ’XX, June 03–05, 2018, Woodstock, NY ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition. Associat...

  8. [8]

    Carron, Heather A

    Albert V. Carron, Heather A. Hausenblas, and Diane Mack. 1996. Social Influence and Exercise: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology18, 1 (1996), 1–16

  9. [9]

    Shelley H. Carson. 2011. Creativity and Psychopathology: A Shared Vulnerability Model.The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry56, 3 (2011), 144–153. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/070674371105600304

  10. [10]

    Chase, Doris B

    Catherine C. Chase, Doris B. Chin, Marily A. Oppezzo, and Daniel L. Schwartz

  11. [11]

    2009), 334–352

    Teachable Agents and the Protégé Effect: Increasing the Effort Towards Learning.Journal of Science Education and Technology18, 4 (Aug. 2009), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9180-4

  12. [12]

    2009.Designing a Trading Card Game as Educational Reward System to Improve Students’ Learning Motivations

    Peayton Chen, Rita Kuo, Maiga Chang, and Jia-Sheng Heh. 2009.Designing a Trading Card Game as Educational Reward System to Improve Students’ Learning Motivations. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 116–128. https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11245-4_11

  13. [13]

    Bobby Chiu. 2016. Artist Self Doubt. YouTube video. Available at:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huwOsyPseII (accessed 2025-09-10)

  14. [14]

    Cornelia Connolly, Eamonn Murphy, and Sarah Moore. 2009. Programming Anxiety Amongst Computing Students—A Key in the Retention Debate?IEEE Transactions on Education52, 1 (2009), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2008. 917193

  15. [15]

    2015.Human Resource Machine

    Tomorrow Corporation. 2015.Human Resource Machine. Tomorrow Corporation. Retrieved January 27, 2026 from https://store.steampowered.com/app/375820/ Human_Resource_Machine/

  16. [16]

    Lawrence Crawford. 1984. Viktor Shklovskij: Différance in Defamiliarization. Comparative Literature36, 3 (1984), 209–219

  17. [17]

    2025.Doxxing Policy Explainer

    Discord, Inc. 2025.Doxxing Policy Explainer. Discord, Inc. https://discord.com/ safety/doxxing-policy-explainer

  18. [18]

    Dow, Alana Glassco, Jonathan Kass, Melissa Schwarz, Daniel L

    Steven P. Dow, Alana Glassco, Jonathan Kass, Melissa Schwarz, Daniel L. Schwartz, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2011. Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy.ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.17, 4, Article 18 (Dec. 2011), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1879831. 1879836

  19. [19]

    2015.Welcome to Art Fight! The annual art trading game, starting on July 1st!Art Fight

    Art Fight. 2015.Welcome to Art Fight! The annual art trading game, starting on July 1st!Art Fight. Retrieved September 3, 2024 from https://artfight.net/

  20. [20]

    2024.New Research Explores Arts Engagement and Social Connectedness

    National Endowment for the Arts. 2024.New Research Explores Arts Engagement and Social Connectedness. National Endowment for the Arts. https://www.arts.gov/news/press-releases/2024/new-research-explores- arts-engagement-and-social-connectedness

  21. [21]

    Ricky Galloway, Hunna Watson, Danyelle Greene, Roz Shafran, and Sarah J Egan

  22. [22]

    The efficacy of randomised controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy for perfectionism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cognitive Behaviour Therapy51, 2 (2022), 170–184

  23. [23]

    Germer and Kristin D

    Christopher K. Germer and Kristin D. Neff. 2013. Self-compassion in clinical prac- tice.Journal of clinical psychology69 8 (2013), 856–67. https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:2799698

  24. [24]

    Paul Gilbert, Marlea Clarke, Susanne Hempel, Jeremy NV Miles, and Chris Irons

  25. [25]

    Criticizing and reassuring oneself: An exploration of forms, styles and reasons in female students.British Journal of Clinical Psychology43, 1 (2004), 31–50

  26. [26]

    Karolina Głaziewicz and Krystyna Golonka. 2024. When the creative well dries up–burnout syndrome and art block in artists’ sample.Thinking Skills and Creativity54 (2024), 101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101692

  27. [27]

    Matthew Hantsbarger, Giovanni Maria Troiano, Alexandra To, and Casper Harteveld. 2022. Alienated serendipity and reflective failure: Exploring queer game mechanics and queerness in games via queer temporality.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction6, CHI PLAY (2022), 1–27

  28. [28]

    Elizabeth A Hart, Mark R Leary, and W Jack Rejeski. 1989. Tie measurement of social physique anxiety.Journal of Sport and exercise Psychology11, 1 (1989), 94–104

  29. [29]

    Chae-Ha Hwang, Hyeon-Ju Song, Min-Ji Jung, Yeon-Jae Choi, and Young Sun Hwang. 2023. Effect of Toothbrushing Application for Kids on Dental Plaque Removal and Interest in Toothbrushing of Preschool Children.Journal of dental hygiene science23, 3 (2023), 208–215

  30. [30]

    2013.InkTober

    InkTober. 2013.InkTober. InkTober. Retrieved September 3, 2024 from https: //inktober.com/

  31. [31]

    Katherine Isbister. 2016. Connecting through play.Interactions23, 4 (2016), 26–33

  32. [32]

    2016.How games move us: Emotion by design

    Katherine Isbister. 2016.How games move us: Emotion by design. Mit Press, USA

  33. [33]

    Geoff F Kaufman and Lisa K Libby. 2012. Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking.Journal of personality and social psychology103, 1 (2012), 1

  34. [34]

    Bernstein

    Joy Kim, Maneesh Agrawala, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2017. Mosaic: Designing Online Creative Communities for Sharing Works-in-Progress. InProceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(Portland, Oregon, USA)(CSCW ’17). Association for Computing Ma- chinery, New York, NY, USA, 246–258. https://doi.org/10....

  35. [35]

    Lee, Julie M

    Fallyn M. Lee, Julie M. Koch, and Nikita Ramakrishnan. 2024. Fine Arts Students: Mental Health, Stress, and Time on Academic Work.Journal of college student psychotherapy38, 2 (2024), 259 – 274. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2023. 2175755

  36. [36]

    Lee and Amy J

    Michael J. Lee and Amy J. Ko. 2011. Personifying programming tool feedback improves novice programmers’ learning. InProceedings of the Seventh Interna- tional Workshop on Computing Education Research(Providence, Rhode Island, USA)(ICER ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1145/2016911.2016934

  37. [37]

    1991.Locus of control.Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA

    Herbert M Lefcourt. 1991.Locus of control.Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA

  38. [38]

    Hao Lin, Haidong Chen, Qingzao Liu, Jie Xu, and Shan Li. 2024. A meta-analysis of the relationship between social support and physical activity in adolescents: the mediating role of self-efficacy.Frontiers in Psychology14 (01 2024). https: //doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1305425

  39. [39]

    Adam Duff LUCIDPIXUL. 2020. Advice For Artists Who Are Too Hard On Themselves. YouTube video. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= w6StfT6_a7g (accessed 2025-09-10)

  40. [40]

    Elizabeth L Murnane, Xin Jiang, Anna Kong, Michelle Park, Weili Shi, Connor Soohoo, Luke Vink, Iris Xia, Xin Yu, John Yang-Sammataro, et al. 2020. Designing ambient narrative-based interfaces to reflect and motivate physical activity. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New ...

  41. [41]

    Kristin D. Neff. 2023. Self-Compassion: Theory, Method, Research, and Inter- vention.Annual Review of Psychology74, Volume 74, 2023 (2023), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031047

  42. [42]

    Hisataka Noguchi. 1999. How do material constraints affect design creativity?. InProceedings of the 3rd Conference on Creativity & Cognition. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 82–87

  43. [43]

    Dan R Olsen Jr. 2007. Evaluating user interface systems research. InProceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. Association for Computing Machinery, USA, 251–258

  44. [44]

    Clarissa W Ong, Eric B Lee, Jennifer Krafft, Carina L Terry, Tyson S Barrett, Michael E Levin, and Michael P Twohig. 2019. A randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinical perfectionism.Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders22 (2019), 100444

  45. [45]

    2020.Gartic Phone

    Gartic Phone. 2020.Gartic Phone. Onrizon Social Games. Retrieved September 3, 2024 from https://garticphone.com/

  46. [46]

    2002.The War of Art: Break Through the Blocks and Win Your Inner Creative Battles

    Steven Pressfield. 2002.The War of Art: Break Through the Blocks and Win Your Inner Creative Battles. Black Irish Entertainment LLC, USA

  47. [47]

    2023.Guide to Thumbnail Sketches

    Art Prof. 2023.Guide to Thumbnail Sketches. Art Prof. Retrieved September 3, 2024 from https://artprof.org/learn/tutorials-media/drawing/thumbnail-sketches/

  48. [48]

    2005.How do you stop with the perfectionism and self-sabotage?Reddit

    Reddit. 2005.How do you stop with the perfectionism and self-sabotage?Reddit. Retrieved September 3, 2024 from https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtistLounge/ comments/k7w259/how_do_you_stop_with_the_perfectionism_and/?rdt= 34967

  49. [49]

    2013.Artist Lounge

    Reddit. 2013.Artist Lounge. Reddit. Retrieved September 9, 2025 from https: //www.reddit.com/r/ArtistLounge/

  50. [50]

    Byron Reeves and Clifford Nass. 1996. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people.Cambridge, UK10, 10 (1996), 19–36

  51. [51]

    Samuel Rhys Cox, Helena Bøjer Djernæs, and Niels van Berkel. 2025. Beyond Productivity: Rethinking the Impact of Creativity Support Tools. InProceedings of the 2025 Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3698061.3726924

  52. [52]

    2013.The Typing of The Dead: Overkill

    SEGA. 2013.The Typing of The Dead: Overkill. SEGA. Retrieved January 27, 2026 from https://store.steampowered.com/app/246580/The_Typing_of_The_Dead_ Overkill/

  53. [53]

    Ben Shahar, Erica R Carlin, David E Engle, Jayanta Hegde, Ohad Szepsenwol, and Hal Arkowitz. 2012. A pilot investigation of emotion-focused two-chair dialogue intervention for self-criticism.Clinical psychology & psychotherapy19, 6 (2012), 496–507

  54. [54]

    A. Sion, J. Czamanski-Cohen, O.C. Halbrecht-Shaked, G. Galili, and J. Cwikel. 2023. Self-correction, digital art making and stress reduction.The Arts in Psychotherapy 85 (2023), 102060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2023.102060

  55. [55]

    2022.The impact of self-criticism throughout the creative process

    Colleen Standish. 2022.The impact of self-criticism throughout the creative process. Ph. D. Dissertation. The University of Oklahoma

  56. [56]

    2022.Process-Sensitive Creativity Support Tools

    Sarah Gimbert Sterman. 2022.Process-Sensitive Creativity Support Tools. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley

  57. [57]

    Alexandra To, Joselyn McDonald, Jarrek Holmes, Geoff Kaufman, and Jes- sica Hammer. 2018. Character Diversity in Digital and Non-Digital Games. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association4 (10 2018). https: //doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v4i1.84

  58. [58]

    Daniela Villani, Claudia Carissoli, Stefano Triberti, Antonella Marchetti, Gabriella Gilli, and Giuseppe Riva. 2018. Videogames for emotion regulation: a systematic review.Games for health journal7, 2 (2018), 85–99

  59. [59]

    David Watson, Lee Anna Clark, and Auke Tellegen. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Conference acronym ’XX, June 03–05, 2018, Woodstock, NY Catherine Mullings and Michael S. Bernstein Journal of personality and social psychology54, 6 (1988), 1063

  60. [60]

    Blake Williford, Matthew Runyon, Adil Hamid Malla, Wayne Li, Julie Linsey, and Tracy Hammond. 2017. ZenSketch: A Sketch-based Game For Improving Line Work. InExtended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer- Human Interaction in Play(Amsterdam, The Netherlands)(CHI PLAY ’17 Extended Abstracts). Association for Computing Machinery, New Yo...

  61. [61]

    Darya L Zabelina and Michael D Robinson. 2010. Don’t be so hard on yourself: Self-compassion facilitates creative originality among self-judgmental individuals. Creativity Research Journal22, 3 (2010), 288–293

  62. [62]

    2009.What is Illustration? (Essential Design Handbook)

    Lawrence Zeegen. 2009.What is Illustration? (Essential Design Handbook). Rock- port Publishers, USA

  63. [63]

    David C Zuroff, Gentiana Sadikaj, Allison C Kelly, and Michelle J Leybman. 2016. Conceptualizing and measuring self-criticism as both a personality trait and a personality state.Journal of personality assessment98, 1 (2016), 14–21