Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Confrontation of Double-Inflationary Models with Observations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/9403037 v1 pith:DCDS23B7 submitted 1994-03-17 astro-ph gr-qc

classification astro-phgr-qc
keywords modelsobservationsmodelscalardouble-inflationaryfieldfracinitial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider double-inflationary models with two noninteracting scalar fields, a light scalar field $\phi_l$ with potential $\frac{1}{2}m_l^2\phi_l^2$ and a heavy scalar field $\phi_h$ with potential $\frac{\lambda}{n}\phi_h^n$ with $n=2,4$. CDM with the initial spectrum of adiabatic perturbations produced in these models is compared with observations. These models contain two more free parameters than the standard CDM model with an initial scale-invariant spectrum. We normalize our spectra to COBE DMR and compare the predictions with observations on the biasing factor, large-scale peculiar velocities, quasar and galaxy formation and the Stromlo-APM counts-in-cells analysis. The model with $n=4$ is excluded by the data while for the $n=2$ model, taking cosmic variance into account, a small window of parameters compatible with observations is found.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tilt and Tensor-to-Scalar Ratio in Multi-Scalar Field Inflation: Non-Sum-Separable Case

    gr-qc 2024-12 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A two-field chaotic inflation model with a kinetic-potential coupling can in principle lower ns and r, but the paper's analytic formulas miscompute the correction and its quoted parameter ranges are fitted rather than...

Pith tools