Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Smarr's formula for black holes with non-linear electrodynamics

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 21 May 2004

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The same is done for the regular black hole solution derived by Ayon-Beato and Garcia, showing that in the case that variations of the electric charge are involved, the Smarr's formula does not longer is valid.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDgr-qc/0405116 (version 1)
Pith IDDZOM75Z3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationNora Breton. "Smarr's formula for black holes with non-linear electrodynamics." arXiv:gr-qc/0405116 (2004). https://pith.science/paper/DZOM75Z3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,969 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.56 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.66 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

It is known that for nonlinear electrodynamics the First Law of Black Hole Mechanics holds, however the Smarr's formula for the total mass does not. In this contribution we discuss the point and determine the corresponding expressions for the Bardeen black hole solution that represents a nonlinear magnetic monopole. The same is done for the regular black hole solution derived by Ayon-Beato and Garcia, showing that in the case that variations of the electric charge are involved, the Smarr's formula does not longer is valid.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 It is known that for nonlinear electrodynamics the First Law of Black Hole Mechanics holds, however the Smarr's formula for the total mass does not. background 0.88 0.04 0.25 asserted 1.00
s1 In this contribution we discuss the point and determine the corresponding expressions for the Bardeen black hole solution that represents a nonlinear magnetic monopole. contribution 1.00 0.85 0.10 asserted 0.91
s2 The same is done for the regular black hole solution derived by Ayon-Beato and Garcia, showing that in the case that variations of the electric charge are involved, the Smarr's formula does not longer is valid. result 0.83 0.85 0.45 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.98 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

It is known that for nonlinear electrodynamics the First Law of Black Hole Mechanics holds, however the Smarr's formula for the total mass does not. In this contribution we discuss the point and determine the corresponding expressions for the Bardeen black hole solution that represents a nonlinear magnetic monopole. The same is done for the regular black hole solution derived by Ayon-Beato and Garcia, showing that in the case that variations of the electric charge are involved, the Smarr's formula does not longer is valid.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

16 arXiv papers cite this in 17 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 11 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 6 papers
  • It has been known that the Born-Infeld parameter [ref] , the Gauss-Bonnet coupling constant [ref] , and the noncommutative parameter [ref] can be dealt with as a kind of thermodynamic pressure.

    Thermodynamics of Horndeski black holes with non-minimal derivative coupling · Introduction · 0.87

  • Here we have analyses of the black hole thermodynamics for some specific theories (e.g. power-Maxwell in arbitrary number of dimensions [ref] , Born–Infeld [ref] , and Euler–Heisenberg [ref] ) or more general discussions (Smarr formula via assumed first law and scaling arguments [ref] ; electrically charged black holes [ref] but with highly implicit form of the first law and Smarr formula; Smarr formula for the $$-class NLE Lagrangian, using assumed first law and scaling argument [ref] ; various analyses of phase transitions in the presence of a cosmological constant and NLE fields [ref] ; thermodynamical stability [ref] ).

    Black hole thermodynamics in the presence of nonlinear electromagnetic fields · Introduction · 0.98

  • NLED has been widely utilized in black hole physics, both as a mechanism for removing singularities [ref] and in studies of black hole thermodynamics [ref] .

    Black hole solutions in Cotton gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics · Introduction · 0.95

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.