REVIEW 3 cited by
Measurement of event shape distributions and moments in e+e- -> hadrons at 91-209 GeV and a determination of alpha_s
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We have studied hadronic events from e+e- annihilation data at centre-of-mass energies from 91 to 209 GeV. We present distributions of event shape observables and their moments at each energy and compare with QCD Monte Carlo models. From the event shape distributions we extract the strong coupling alpha_s and test its evolution with energy scale. The results are consistent with the running of alpha_s expected from QCD. Combining all data, the value of alpha_s(M_Z) is determined to be alpha_s(M_Z) = 0.1191 +- 0.0005 (stat.) +- 0.0010 (expt.) +- 0.0011 (hadr.) +- 0.0044 (theo.). The energy evolution of the moments is also used to determine a value of alpha_s with slightly larger errors: alpha_s(M_Z) = 0.1223 +- 0.0005 (stat.) +- 0.0014 (expt.) +- 0.0016 (hadr.) +0.0054 -0.0036 (theo.).
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Thrust distribution in electron-positron annihilation at full NNNLL+NNLO (and beyond) in QCD
Laplace-space resummation of the thrust distribution at N4LL accuracy yields alpha_S(mZ^2) = 0.1181 +/- 0.0018, consistent with the world average, while physical-space resummation gives a lower value.
-
Recoil-Safe Subtraction, Matching and Merging in e+e- to hadrons
The Alaric shower is matched to NLO matrix elements and merged to five jets in e+e- to hadrons, with new analytic subtraction terms validated against Catani-Seymour subtraction.
-
Fits of $\alpha_s$ from event-shapes in the three-jet region: extension to all energies
The strong coupling at the Z mass is measured as 0.1181 from event-shape distributions using three-jet power corrections, with hadron-mass scheme ambiguity as the largest uncertainty.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.