Reply to Boglione and Pennington
classification
✦ hep-ph
hep-lat
keywords
boglionepenningtonarticlereplyaddressappearsapproximationargument
read the original abstract
In a recent article we presented an argument which, we believe, shows to be incorrect an estimate, by Boglione and Pennington, of corrections to the valence (quenched) approximation predictions for properties of the lightest scalar glueball. Boglione and Pennington's reply to our article, it appears to us, fails to address the specific technical issues we raised.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.