Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Dirty blackholes: Thermodynamics and horizon structure

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 20 Mar 1992

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This paper will argue that this suppression is generic.

how it is stated · asserted 0.67 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/9203057 (version 2)
Pith IDQBHT6MT3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationMatt Visser. "Dirty blackholes: Thermodynamics and horizon structure." arXiv:hep-th/9203057 (1992). https://pith.science/paper/QBHT6MT3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,343 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.12 · states limitation 0.44 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.57 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.93 · compares with prior results 0.85 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Considerable interest has recently been expressed in (static spherically symmetric) blackholes in interaction with various classical matter fields (such as electromagnetic fields, dilaton fields, axion fields, Abelian Higgs fields, non--Abelian gauge fields, {\sl etc}). A common feature of these investigations that has not previously been remarked upon is that the Hawking temperature of such systems appears to be suppressed relative to that of a vacuum blackhole of equal horizon area. That is: $k T_H \leq \hbar/(4\pi r_H) \equiv \hbar/\sqrt{4\pi A_H}$. This paper will argue that this suppression is generic. Specifically, it will be shown that \[ k T_H = {\hbar\over4\pi r_H} \; e^{-\phi(r_H)} \; \left( 1 - 8\pi G \; \rho_H \; r_H^2 \right). \] Here $\phi(r_H)$ is an integral quantity, depending on the distribution of matter, that is guaranteed to be positive if the Weak Energy Condition is satisfied. Several examples of this behaviour will be discussed. Generalizations of this behaviour to non--symmetric non--static blackholes are conjectured.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Considerable interest has recently been expressed in (static spherically symmetric) blackholes in interaction with various classical matter fields (such as electromagnetic fields, dilaton fields, axion fields, Abelian Higgs fields, non--Abelian gauge fields, {\sl etc}). background 1.00 0.03 0.02 asserted 0.97
s1 A common feature of these investigations that has not previously been remarked upon is that the Hawking temperature of such systems appears to be suppressed relative to that of a vacuum blackhole of equal horizon area. gap 0.88 0.10 0.15 asserted 0.69
s2 That is: $k T_H \leq \hbar/(4\pi r_H) \equiv \hbar/\sqrt{4\pi A_H}$. result 0.62 0.14 0.09 asserted 0.99
s3 This paper will argue that this suppression is generic. contribution 0.67 0.39 0.71 asserted 0.67
s4 Specifically, it will be shown that \[ k T_H = {\hbar\over4\pi r_H} \; e^{-\phi(r_H)} \; \left( 1 - 8\pi G \; \rho_H \; r_H^2 \right). result 0.97 0.85 0.53 asserted 1.00
s5 \] Here $\phi(r_H)$ is an integral quantity, depending on the distribution of matter, that is guaranteed to be positive if the Weak Energy Condition is satisfied. interpretation 0.48 0.48 0.06 asserted 1.00
s6 Several examples of this behaviour will be discussed. contribution 0.90 0.54 0.03 asserted 0.73
s7 Generalizations of this behaviour to non--symmetric non--static blackholes are conjectured. future work 0.92 0.16 0.05 speculative 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.92.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Considerable interest has recently been expressed in (static spherically symmetric) blackholes in interaction with various classical matter fields (such as electromagnetic fields, dilaton fields, axion fields, Abelian Higgs fields, non--Abelian gauge fields, {\sl etc}). A common feature of these investigations that has not previously been remarked upon is that the Hawking temperature of such systems appears to be suppressed relative to that of a vacuum blackhole of equal horizon area. That is: $k T_H \leq \hbar/(4\pi r_H) \equiv \hbar/\sqrt{4\pi A_H}$. This paper will argue that this suppression is generic. Specifically, it will be shown that \[ k T_H = {\hbar\over4\pi r_H} \; e^{-\phi(r_H)} \; \left( 1 - 8\pi G \; \rho_H \; r_H^2 \right). \] Here $\phi(r_H)$ is an integral quantity, depending on the distribution of matter, that is guaranteed to be positive if the Weak Energy Condition is satisfied. Several examples of this behaviour will be discussed. Generalizations of this behaviour to non--symmetric non--static blackholes are conjectured.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

41 arXiv papers cite this in 53 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 38 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • Keeping in mind that we are still working in curvature coordinates, the surface gravity $κ_H$ reduces to [ref]

    Charged black-bounce spacetimes · Horizons and surface gravity · 0.82

Cites it as background 14 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.