Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Symmetry breaking boundaries I. General theory

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 18 Feb 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Integrality of the annulus coefficients is proven in full generality.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/9902132 (version 2)
Pith ID2HVUJR4B, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationC. Schweigert, J. Fuchs. "Symmetry breaking boundaries I. General theory." arXiv:hep-th/9902132 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/2HVUJR4B
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,480 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.12 · compares with prior results 0.04 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study conformally invariant boundary conditions that break part of the bulk symmetries. A general theory is developped for those boundary conditions for which the preserved subalgebra is the fixed algebra under an abelian orbifold group. We explicitly construct the boundary states and reflection coefficients as well as the annulus amplitudes. Integrality of the annulus coefficients is proven in full generality.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study conformally invariant boundary conditions that break part of the bulk symmetries. contribution 0.81 0.88 0.07 asserted 0.89
s1 A general theory is developped for those boundary conditions for which the preserved subalgebra is the fixed algebra under an abelian orbifold group. contribution 0.92 0.90 0.15 asserted 1.00
s2 We explicitly construct the boundary states and reflection coefficients as well as the annulus amplitudes. contribution 0.90 0.95 0.13 asserted 1.00
s3 Integrality of the annulus coefficients is proven in full generality. result 0.99 0.92 0.32 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study conformally invariant boundary conditions that break part of the bulk symmetries. A general theory is developped for those boundary conditions for which the preserved subalgebra is the fixed algebra under an abelian orbifold group. We explicitly construct the boundary states and reflection coefficients as well as the annulus amplitudes. Integrality of the annulus coefficients is proven in full generality.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

11 arXiv papers cite this in 16 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 9 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 5 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.