{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:23UZLL5XCQAEODQ5GPICBNXWFH","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"a52be7e8a3decf144916de20bcd76b4027074922e61c372e88a7e06a91fd7842","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2026-05-15T20:43:55Z","title_canon_sha256":"8496db0c1dcf350e9a9c0f1ef153347feee1985f1b8676e5b6631eb03c66a773"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.16623","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.16623","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:33Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.16623v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:33Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.16623","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:33Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"23UZLL5XCQAE","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:33Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"23UZLL5XCQAEODQ5","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:33Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"23UZLL5X","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:33Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:6a849699b6082174d0396eabe12d226760034651e470c779fcadfdc00ab0c96b","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:33Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Most respondents (83.9%) considered the AI-based review useful, 80.4% reported that it identified issues not mentioned by human reviewers, and 82.1% reported using at least some AI feedback in their camera-ready version."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"The 56 responses from a self-selected subset of authors at two specific CS venues are representative enough to support general statements about author perceptions of AI reviews; the paper relies on this without reporting response rate or testing for non-response bias."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Survey of 56 authors at two CS venues finds 84% viewed AI reviews as useful and 82% used some feedback in revisions, yet trusted them less than human reviews and preferred supervised deployment."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Authors at CS venues found AI-based reviews useful enough to use in revisions, though they trusted them less than human reviews."}],"snapshot_sha256":"e4c3d6cd62129ef9260f2a29be02ba1e75ded8f32ca6fa19319f57a5af7038c1"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"integrity":{"available":true,"clean":true,"detectors_run":[{"findings_count":0,"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T21:01:19.327839Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0"},{"findings_count":0,"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T20:51:22.695490Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0"},{"findings_count":0,"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T19:21:56.763970Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0"},{"findings_count":0,"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T18:33:26.586504Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0"}],"endpoint":"/pith/2605.16623/integrity.json","findings":[],"snapshot_sha256":"360deb1e92590a76d1a1411d2ba48f2daa58360d36b8f601d20bcc9b83b7dcfa","summary":{"advisory":0,"by_detector":{},"critical":0,"informational":0}},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"Large language models are increasingly discussed and used as tools that may assist with scholarly peer review, but empirical evidence regarding how authors use and perceive AI-based feedback remains limited. This paper reports findings from two independent pilot studies on authors' use and perceptions of AI-based auxiliary review at two computer science venues. After the review release, authors were invited to complete an anonymous post-review questionnaire about the AI review's usefulness, trustworthiness, agreement with human reviews, practical value for revision, perceived inaccuracies, and","authors_text":"C\\'esar Leblanc, Lukas Picek","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"headline":"Authors at CS venues found AI-based reviews useful enough to use in revisions, though they trusted them less than human reviews.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2026-05-15T20:43:55Z","title":"To Trust or Not to Trust: Authors' Response to AI-based Reviews"},"references":{"count":51,"internal_anchors":0,"resolved_work":51,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"https://aaai","work_id":"f71b9220-f8b1-49d1-8a26-751ca4117f44","year":2025},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":2,"title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122(5):e2401232121","work_id":"2c497100-ac14-430c-8e28-cda9a100be97","year":2025},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 8:1622292","work_id":"790d4259-5a35-4e3d-b3e5-4210169d9718","year":2025},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"Bhavsar D, Duffy L, Jo H, et al (2025) Policies on artificial intelligence chatbots among academicpublishers:across-sectionalaudit.ResearchIntegrityandPeerReview10(1):1","work_id":"44c71f7c-8871-4bc8-947c-a62bc36f985b","year":2025},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":5,"title":"Qualitative research in psychology 3(2):77–101","work_id":"d1b4828c-c8e1-438c-9e4c-5edc3e8160ee","year":2006}],"snapshot_sha256":"72f3ba0cc43fdacbe1ccfeab1bc4b40ea5c42e89ccb3cf01601385b5af6beff9"},"source":{"id":"2605.16623","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-19T20:43:00.069733Z","id":"8373c078-20f3-4e34-8ef4-59304f8c552b","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"Survey of 56 authors at two CS venues finds 84% viewed AI reviews as useful and 82% used some feedback in revisions, yet trusted them less than human reviews and preferred supervised deployment.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Authors at CS venues found AI-based reviews useful enough to use in revisions, though they trusted them less than human reviews.","strongest_claim":"Most respondents (83.9%) considered the AI-based review useful, 80.4% reported that it identified issues not mentioned by human reviewers, and 82.1% reported using at least some AI feedback in their camera-ready version.","weakest_assumption":"The 56 responses from a self-selected subset of authors at two specific CS venues are representative enough to support general statements about author perceptions of AI reviews; the paper relies on this without reporting response rate or testing for non-response bias."}},"verdict_id":"8373c078-20f3-4e34-8ef4-59304f8c552b"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:e98c6a79920fb6eee2c454f1f537aee9890d0f4bdf3812293e300be472ebebf5","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:33Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"a52be7e8a3decf144916de20bcd76b4027074922e61c372e88a7e06a91fd7842","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2026-05-15T20:43:55Z","title_canon_sha256":"8496db0c1dcf350e9a9c0f1ef153347feee1985f1b8676e5b6631eb03c66a773"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.16623","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"canonical_sha256":"d6e995afb71400470e1d33d020b6f629fd0e36fa775617186de07bd29a5c87f3","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"d6e995afb71400470e1d33d020b6f629fd0e36fa775617186de07bd29a5c87f3","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:33.007113Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:33.007113Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"PfJimVtzAFkStsAZkjjbtlXXwyy5Q+2n6ZEVOQKaeIhEEidKYzbgQ4e25Jv2n4CyzqvCSOYkuHOHbOGo0sHPBQ==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:33.007914Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2605.16623","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":1}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:e98c6a79920fb6eee2c454f1f537aee9890d0f4bdf3812293e300be472ebebf5","sha256:6a849699b6082174d0396eabe12d226760034651e470c779fcadfdc00ab0c96b"],"state_sha256":"c222611703fc43a22ea7fc704f8de3d638ffeaefccc97cc417b42d9a34a9a3e2"}