{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2011:24DR62MKH5HXZQIFAHPAO2T2SB","short_pith_number":"pith:24DR62MK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d7071f698a3f4f7cc10501de076a7a9071ee99bb87ab81981852f9ea28a0b058","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1103.2903","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Finn {\\AA}rup Nielsen","submitted_at":"2011-03-15T13:39:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Sentiment analysis of microblogs such as Twitter has recently gained a fair amount of attention. One of the simplest sentiment analysis approaches compares the words of a posting against a labeled word list, where each word has been scored for valence, -- a 'sentiment lexicon' or 'affective word lists'. There exist several affective word lists, e.g., ANEW (Affective Norms for English Words) developed before the advent of microblogging and sentiment analysis. I wanted to examine how well ANEW and other word lists performs for the detection of sentiment strength in microblog posts in comparison "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1103.2903","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2011-03-15T13:39:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"e2663143f8578de95c2ea6eebf04615e73a1a617608cd79dc758d56c3c7c2127","abstract_canon_sha256":"eb49350d2637bac95ba9318effbab0e308cece5705d88df93b5aa9ff2c8bc48d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:33:07.556532Z","signature_b64":"ublx1rfdUjbRkVsWKXvQpQHBYufCI50UGvlrvZwnAMPojqlAX+/cajB80JBqhdSm+OgKAOi1ZZiPF9nKukMxCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d7071f698a3f4f7cc10501de076a7a9071ee99bb87ab81981852f9ea28a0b058","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:33:07.555896Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:33:07.555896Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Finn {\\AA}rup Nielsen","submitted_at":"2011-03-15T13:39:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Sentiment analysis of microblogs such as Twitter has recently gained a fair amount of attention. One of the simplest sentiment analysis approaches compares the words of a posting against a labeled word list, where each word has been scored for valence, -- a 'sentiment lexicon' or 'affective word lists'. There exist several affective word lists, e.g., ANEW (Affective Norms for English Words) developed before the advent of microblogging and sentiment analysis. I wanted to examine how well ANEW and other word lists performs for the detection of sentiment strength in microblog posts in comparison "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1103.2903","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1103.2903","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:33:07.556023+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1103.2903v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:33:07.556023+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1103.2903","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:33:07.556023+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"24DR62MKH5HX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:18.847500+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"24DR62MKH5HXZQIF","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:18.847500+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"24DR62MK","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:18.847500+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.04947","citing_title":"SUMMIR: A Hallucination-Aware Framework for Ranking Sports Insights from LLMs","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/24DR62MKH5HXZQIFAHPAO2T2SB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/24DR62MKH5HXZQIFAHPAO2T2SB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/24DR62MKH5HXZQIFAHPAO2T2SB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/24DR62MKH5HXZQIFAHPAO2T2SB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/24DR62MK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/24DR62MKH5HXZQIFAHPAO2T2SB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/24DR62MKH5HXZQIFAHPAO2T2SB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/24DR62MK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1103.2903&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/24DR62MKH5HXZQIFAHPAO2T2SB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/24DR62MKH5HXZQIFAHPAO2T2SB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/24DR62MKH5HXZQIFAHPAO2T2SB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/24DR62MKH5HXZQIFAHPAO2T2SB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/24DR62MKH5HXZQIFAHPAO2T2SB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/24DR62MKH5HXZQIFAHPAO2T2SB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/24DR62MKH5HXZQIFAHPAO2T2SB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:33:07.556023+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:33:07.556023+00:00"}