{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:25EIPRHSRM4ILUDRTZXIBM3AFQ","short_pith_number":"pith:25EIPRHS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d74887c4f28b3885d0719e6e80b3602c12f71c899e06f94c75dab5dbe4674fd9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2603.11890","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"QUARE: Quality-Aware Requirements Analysis through Multi-Agent Dialectical Negotiation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Foutse Khomh, Haowei Cheng, Hironori Washizaki, Milhan Kim, Naoyasu Ubayashi, Nobukazu Yoshioka, Teeradaj Racharak","submitted_at":"2026-03-12T13:03:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Automating requirements quality analysis remains challenging because multiple, often conflicting quality attributes must be balanced while preserving stakeholder intent. Existing Large-Language-Model (LLM) approaches predominantly rely on task-oriented decomposition or implicit aggregation, limiting their ability to systematically surface and resolve cross-quality conflicts. We present QUARE (QUality-Aware REquirements Analysis), a multi-agent framework that takes a project description as input and formulates requirements quality analysis as structured negotiation among five quality-specialize"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2603.11890","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2026-03-12T13:03:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"67880e8639cb44f769b2ed2f44827481f55ef48b1013174e4869d3606e5f3947","abstract_canon_sha256":"d46088a1412eda64483568d097011718b51b2d2849a4f5c009c5bcc5ab83b2fd"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-08T01:05:09.763202Z","signature_b64":"IM0bgtAdJacoLtCGBa2DF9T9lVRN7eV/nPV0+nwdSCGeXJbO14/ZiAG0VUpbPR+hLMnISmbcO6YCsjcL+9r9DA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d74887c4f28b3885d0719e6e80b3602c12f71c899e06f94c75dab5dbe4674fd9","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-08T01:05:09.762236Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-08T01:05:09.762236Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"QUARE: Quality-Aware Requirements Analysis through Multi-Agent Dialectical Negotiation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Foutse Khomh, Haowei Cheng, Hironori Washizaki, Milhan Kim, Naoyasu Ubayashi, Nobukazu Yoshioka, Teeradaj Racharak","submitted_at":"2026-03-12T13:03:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Automating requirements quality analysis remains challenging because multiple, often conflicting quality attributes must be balanced while preserving stakeholder intent. Existing Large-Language-Model (LLM) approaches predominantly rely on task-oriented decomposition or implicit aggregation, limiting their ability to systematically surface and resolve cross-quality conflicts. We present QUARE (QUality-Aware REquirements Analysis), a multi-agent framework that takes a project description as input and formulates requirements quality analysis as structured negotiation among five quality-specialize"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2603.11890","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2603.11890/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2603.11890","created_at":"2026-06-08T01:05:09.762390+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2603.11890v2","created_at":"2026-06-08T01:05:09.762390+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2603.11890","created_at":"2026-06-08T01:05:09.762390+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"25EIPRHSRM4I","created_at":"2026-06-08T01:05:09.762390+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"25EIPRHSRM4ILUDR","created_at":"2026-06-08T01:05:09.762390+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"25EIPRHS","created_at":"2026-06-08T01:05:09.762390+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23124","citing_title":"ArgRE: Formal Argumentation for Conflict Resolution in Multi-Agent Requirements Negotiation","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/25EIPRHSRM4ILUDRTZXIBM3AFQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/25EIPRHSRM4ILUDRTZXIBM3AFQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/25EIPRHSRM4ILUDRTZXIBM3AFQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/25EIPRHSRM4ILUDRTZXIBM3AFQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/25EIPRHS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/25EIPRHSRM4ILUDRTZXIBM3AFQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/25EIPRHSRM4ILUDRTZXIBM3AFQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/25EIPRHS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2603.11890&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/25EIPRHSRM4ILUDRTZXIBM3AFQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/25EIPRHSRM4ILUDRTZXIBM3AFQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/25EIPRHSRM4ILUDRTZXIBM3AFQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/25EIPRHSRM4ILUDRTZXIBM3AFQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/25EIPRHSRM4ILUDRTZXIBM3AFQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/25EIPRHSRM4ILUDRTZXIBM3AFQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/25EIPRHSRM4ILUDRTZXIBM3AFQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-08T01:05:09.762390+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-08T01:05:09.762390+00:00"}