{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:25IUBCDKTHCIB5PWEM32LHK5CR","short_pith_number":"pith:25IUBCDK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d75140886a99c480f5f62337a59d5d146a7ef25389beef8088c1c5f22b54d71f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2509.08853","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"POW: Political Overton Windows of Large Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Leif Azzopardi, Yashar Moshfeghi","submitted_at":"2025-09-08T17:57:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Political bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) presents a growing concern for the responsible deployment of AI systems. Traditional audits often attempt to locate a model's political position as a point estimate, masking the broader set of ideological boundaries that shape what a model is willing or unwilling to say. In this paper, we draw upon the concept of the Overton Window as a framework for mapping these boundaries: the range of political views that a given LLM will espouse, remain neutral on, or refuse to endorse. To uncover these windows, we applied an auditing-based methodology, calle"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2509.08853","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2025-09-08T17:57:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d6dcc2270206caef28899fd298f233f172edaa543d17a1577563c289a83d9023","abstract_canon_sha256":"6c73a669c8b4ea7f92cea0dcefa03f376a85a4a9ec714c3ae0d6f4a12cb9295a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T12:08:37.984534Z","signature_b64":"mvnVdKdEW1jmUO5NHDVDMFFBFQH5pT49DV9mFNZqgGqnmC9wT2Lb22RGtWRUTsc9i7kteIu4IGOGuXZi9LSVCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d75140886a99c480f5f62337a59d5d146a7ef25389beef8088c1c5f22b54d71f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T12:08:37.984051Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T12:08:37.984051Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"POW: Political Overton Windows of Large Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Leif Azzopardi, Yashar Moshfeghi","submitted_at":"2025-09-08T17:57:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Political bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) presents a growing concern for the responsible deployment of AI systems. Traditional audits often attempt to locate a model's political position as a point estimate, masking the broader set of ideological boundaries that shape what a model is willing or unwilling to say. In this paper, we draw upon the concept of the Overton Window as a framework for mapping these boundaries: the range of political views that a given LLM will espouse, remain neutral on, or refuse to endorse. To uncover these windows, we applied an auditing-based methodology, calle"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2509.08853","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2509.08853/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2509.08853","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:08:37.984108+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2509.08853v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:08:37.984108+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2509.08853","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:08:37.984108+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"25IUBCDKTHCI","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:08:37.984108+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"25IUBCDKTHCIB5PW","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:08:37.984108+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"25IUBCDK","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:08:37.984108+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08522","citing_title":"Coordinates of Capability: A Unified MTMM-Geometric Framework for LLM Evaluation","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/25IUBCDKTHCIB5PWEM32LHK5CR","json":"https://pith.science/pith/25IUBCDKTHCIB5PWEM32LHK5CR.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/25IUBCDKTHCIB5PWEM32LHK5CR/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/25IUBCDKTHCIB5PWEM32LHK5CR/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/25IUBCDK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/25IUBCDKTHCIB5PWEM32LHK5CR","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/25IUBCDKTHCIB5PWEM32LHK5CR.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/25IUBCDK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2509.08853&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/25IUBCDKTHCIB5PWEM32LHK5CR/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/25IUBCDKTHCIB5PWEM32LHK5CR/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/25IUBCDKTHCIB5PWEM32LHK5CR/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/25IUBCDKTHCIB5PWEM32LHK5CR/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/25IUBCDKTHCIB5PWEM32LHK5CR/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/25IUBCDKTHCIB5PWEM32LHK5CR/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/25IUBCDKTHCIB5PWEM32LHK5CR/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T12:08:37.984108+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T12:08:37.984108+00:00"}