{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYRB2LQ3ZWY5O","short_pith_number":"pith:2CBJB4TR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d08290f27146987da3110e970de6d8eb86458c6d49b720e9f8530df9c202b496","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2210.08459","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"StoryER: Automatic Story Evaluation via Ranking, Rating and Reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Duc Minh Vo, Hideki Nakayama, Hiroya Takamura, Hong Chen, Yusuke Miyao","submitted_at":"2022-10-16T06:27:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Existing automatic story evaluation methods place a premium on story lexical level coherence, deviating from human preference. We go beyond this limitation by considering a novel \\textbf{Story} \\textbf{E}valuation method that mimics human preference when judging a story, namely \\textbf{StoryER}, which consists of three sub-tasks: \\textbf{R}anking, \\textbf{R}ating and \\textbf{R}easoning. Given either a machine-generated or a human-written story, StoryER requires the machine to output 1) a preference score that corresponds to human preference, 2) specific ratings and their corresponding confiden"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2210.08459","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2022-10-16T06:27:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"6c269ff171eb539bd08ffa7fefb1009e679d8367b0435af2300745133c855943","abstract_canon_sha256":"3d9541dc645025b6fc5e6276911c7f66c4eeea40c2898bc4c4094db6ea316f33"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:06.457886Z","signature_b64":"WM1hnG/GCmzQNsjLKryevisJUdxiW8khhOmjvFaP55iO8tqI7AurjT0ZB5HUvOYBxvj9PMfynVf8uYdMg0ysAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d08290f27146987da3110e970de6d8eb86458c6d49b720e9f8530df9c202b496","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:06.457484Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:06.457484Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"StoryER: Automatic Story Evaluation via Ranking, Rating and Reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Duc Minh Vo, Hideki Nakayama, Hiroya Takamura, Hong Chen, Yusuke Miyao","submitted_at":"2022-10-16T06:27:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Existing automatic story evaluation methods place a premium on story lexical level coherence, deviating from human preference. We go beyond this limitation by considering a novel \\textbf{Story} \\textbf{E}valuation method that mimics human preference when judging a story, namely \\textbf{StoryER}, which consists of three sub-tasks: \\textbf{R}anking, \\textbf{R}ating and \\textbf{R}easoning. Given either a machine-generated or a human-written story, StoryER requires the machine to output 1) a preference score that corresponds to human preference, 2) specific ratings and their corresponding confiden"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2210.08459","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2210.08459/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2210.08459","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:06.457538+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2210.08459v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:06.457538+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2210.08459","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:06.457538+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2CBJB4TRI2MH","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:06.457538+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYR","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:06.457538+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2CBJB4TR","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:06.457538+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00918","citing_title":"From Personas to Plot: Character-Grounded Multi-Agent Story Generation for Long-Form Narratives","ref_index":48,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYRB2LQ3ZWY5O","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYRB2LQ3ZWY5O.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYRB2LQ3ZWY5O/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYRB2LQ3ZWY5O/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2CBJB4TR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYRB2LQ3ZWY5O","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYRB2LQ3ZWY5O.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2CBJB4TR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2210.08459&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYRB2LQ3ZWY5O/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYRB2LQ3ZWY5O/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYRB2LQ3ZWY5O/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYRB2LQ3ZWY5O/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYRB2LQ3ZWY5O/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYRB2LQ3ZWY5O/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2CBJB4TRI2MH3IYRB2LQ3ZWY5O/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:06.457538+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:06.457538+00:00"}