{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC4ZDPHWYDVH","short_pith_number":"pith:2CIAEEU4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d09002129c3faf195922e646f3db03a9fa6344dd9adb9d1de328e6df53cc2c88","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2305.07689","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Matching the 2HDM to the HEFT and the SMEFT: Decoupling and Perturbativity","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Carlos Quezada-Calonge, Duarte Fontes, Juan Jos\\'e Sanz-Cillero, Sally Dawson","submitted_at":"2023-05-12T18:00:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider the 2 Higgs Doublet Model (2HDM) and compare two effective field theory (EFT) approaches to it, according to whether the heavy degrees of freedom are integrated out before (SMEFT) or after (HEFT) spontaneous symmetry breaking. %We show that, in the HEFT, an inconsistent EFT is obtained if one considers an expansion simply in inverse powers of the heavy masses. %We consider a HEFT expansion consistent with perturbativity %We show that, if the HEFT approach is required to comply with perturbativity, it ends up obeying the same power counting as the SMEFT one. % By requiring decouplin"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2305.07689","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2023-05-12T18:00:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d7f677012bdb242bc450ebcb52e6d2b719d786bed909e11db6f13ef7527e0395","abstract_canon_sha256":"704467c4f743425a5beba32d57e4fccf366b54f0a103a3b344ce7198619c224e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:22.118285Z","signature_b64":"E5cde2NLkCytTbevE3RVxqwqDIzeSIHjoL2kMudEoAEkM8ZdlUsNFcJA1k6You9CRBDUHbSpQHJDO6KdhxfjAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d09002129c3faf195922e646f3db03a9fa6344dd9adb9d1de328e6df53cc2c88","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:22.117862Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:22.117862Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Matching the 2HDM to the HEFT and the SMEFT: Decoupling and Perturbativity","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Carlos Quezada-Calonge, Duarte Fontes, Juan Jos\\'e Sanz-Cillero, Sally Dawson","submitted_at":"2023-05-12T18:00:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider the 2 Higgs Doublet Model (2HDM) and compare two effective field theory (EFT) approaches to it, according to whether the heavy degrees of freedom are integrated out before (SMEFT) or after (HEFT) spontaneous symmetry breaking. %We show that, in the HEFT, an inconsistent EFT is obtained if one considers an expansion simply in inverse powers of the heavy masses. %We consider a HEFT expansion consistent with perturbativity %We show that, if the HEFT approach is required to comply with perturbativity, it ends up obeying the same power counting as the SMEFT one. % By requiring decouplin"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2305.07689","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2305.07689/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2305.07689","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:22.117916+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2305.07689v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:22.117916+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2305.07689","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:22.117916+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2CIAEEU4H6XR","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:22.117916+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:22.117916+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2CIAEEU4","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:22.117916+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.05201","citing_title":"SUSY meets SMEFT: Complete one-loop matching of the general MSSM","ref_index":92,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.23410","citing_title":"The Art of Counting: a reappraisal of the HEFT expansion","ref_index":65,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.26817","citing_title":"When Two Loops Matter: Electroweak Precision in the SMEFT","ref_index":81,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC4ZDPHWYDVH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC4ZDPHWYDVH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC4ZDPHWYDVH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC4ZDPHWYDVH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2CIAEEU4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC4ZDPHWYDVH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC4ZDPHWYDVH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2CIAEEU4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2305.07689&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC4ZDPHWYDVH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC4ZDPHWYDVH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC4ZDPHWYDVH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC4ZDPHWYDVH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC4ZDPHWYDVH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC4ZDPHWYDVH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2CIAEEU4H6XRSWJC4ZDPHWYDVH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:22.117916+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:22.117916+00:00"}