{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAARCRVZ4HSDF","short_pith_number":"pith:2EHH5LHO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d10e7eaceeb9c8c40c0088a35cf0f21963cee7203db89000b0d89faedaeba204","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2201.01322","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Opinion dynamics in social networks: From models to data","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","cs.SI","nlin.AO"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"Antonio F. Peralta, Gerardo I\\~niguez, J\\'anos Kert\\'esz","submitted_at":"2022-01-04T19:21:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Opinions are an integral part of how we perceive the world and each other. They shape collective action, playing a role in democratic processes, the evolution of norms, and cultural change. For decades, researchers in the social and natural sciences have tried to describe how shifting individual perspectives and social exchange lead to archetypal states of public opinion like consensus and polarization. Here we review some of the many contributions to the field, focusing both on idealized models of opinion dynamics, and attempts at validating them with observational data and controlled sociolo"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2201.01322","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","submitted_at":"2022-01-04T19:21:26Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY","cs.SI","nlin.AO"],"title_canon_sha256":"0f1b111de5e915f7a0f7c926f59536131c130fd373cb5a9f60cda77b4824ae9f","abstract_canon_sha256":"b8a0d541da33fb784792ac06e16e539feeef9e9074b7defbec6bad2f6aaf8223"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:36.908968Z","signature_b64":"Gtm7jhJtoCjF1JNvefqzOYKsIS8QrlQfLYvyki2akaYjvNTFDd9QoMcq43aRXG2nspWxzbS3IgADGyA47XTYDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d10e7eaceeb9c8c40c0088a35cf0f21963cee7203db89000b0d89faedaeba204","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:36.908561Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:36.908561Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Opinion dynamics in social networks: From models to data","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","cs.SI","nlin.AO"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"Antonio F. Peralta, Gerardo I\\~niguez, J\\'anos Kert\\'esz","submitted_at":"2022-01-04T19:21:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Opinions are an integral part of how we perceive the world and each other. They shape collective action, playing a role in democratic processes, the evolution of norms, and cultural change. For decades, researchers in the social and natural sciences have tried to describe how shifting individual perspectives and social exchange lead to archetypal states of public opinion like consensus and polarization. Here we review some of the many contributions to the field, focusing both on idealized models of opinion dynamics, and attempts at validating them with observational data and controlled sociolo"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2201.01322","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2201.01322/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2201.01322","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:36.908621+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2201.01322v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:36.908621+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2201.01322","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:36.908621+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2EHH5LHOXHEM","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:36.908621+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAA","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:36.908621+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2EHH5LHO","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:36.908621+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.00221","citing_title":"Modified Axelrod Model Showing Opinion Convergence And Polarization In Realistic Scale-Free Networks","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.04280","citing_title":"Mean-Field Analysis of Latent Variable Process Models on Dynamically Evolving Graphs with Feedback Effects","ref_index":66,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20363","citing_title":"Mapping the Winds of Stance Dynamics using Potential Landscape Models","ref_index":74,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.16226","citing_title":"D-MODD: A Diffusion Model of Opinion Dynamics Derived from Online Data","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAARCRVZ4HSDF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAARCRVZ4HSDF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAARCRVZ4HSDF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAARCRVZ4HSDF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2EHH5LHO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAARCRVZ4HSDF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAARCRVZ4HSDF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2EHH5LHO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2201.01322&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAARCRVZ4HSDF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAARCRVZ4HSDF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAARCRVZ4HSDF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAARCRVZ4HSDF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAARCRVZ4HSDF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAARCRVZ4HSDF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2EHH5LHOXHEMIDAARCRVZ4HSDF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:36.908621+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:36.908621+00:00"}