{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW53X3QMN6GZ5","short_pith_number":"pith:2FBVQOXF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d143583ae52c89c266ddddf70637c6cf6494c44f610de7d540be1b77cfa7ec3a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1609.06571","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Magnetic Brane of Cubic Quasi-Topological Gravity in the Presence of Maxwell and Born-Infeld Electromagnetic Field","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"A. Bazrafshan, M. Ghanaatian, R. Tawoosi, S. Taghipoor","submitted_at":"2016-09-05T21:20:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"The main purpose of the present paper is analyzing magnetic brane solutions of cubic quasi-topological gravity in the presence of a linear electromagnetic Maxwell field and a nonlinear electromagnetic Born-Infeld field. We show that the mentioned magnetic solutions have no curvature singularity and also no horizons, but we observe that there is a conic geometry with a related deficit angle. We obtain the metric function and deficit angle and consider their behavior. We show that the attributes of our solution are dependent on cubic quasi-topological coefficient and the Gauss-Bonnet parameter."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1609.06571","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2016-09-05T21:20:50Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"987c8292fd94ca2283a77af2edf19fa28c7de3a2817bd7fa272a15f2fe6de7da","abstract_canon_sha256":"eec895e3fe7607f6666216a9b4c486b5e4a2a15e8c929bd729628416ee03e20e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:00.686005Z","signature_b64":"TZsXBV31SFkIjezZtDynkUB+VdySXCiAhCO2ZsByWp2ZyZYPbsJhlDXHQeU+WNAFPooVXgpeVSzq9plQBiwWDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d143583ae52c89c266ddddf70637c6cf6494c44f610de7d540be1b77cfa7ec3a","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:00.685291Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:00.685291Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Magnetic Brane of Cubic Quasi-Topological Gravity in the Presence of Maxwell and Born-Infeld Electromagnetic Field","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"A. Bazrafshan, M. Ghanaatian, R. Tawoosi, S. Taghipoor","submitted_at":"2016-09-05T21:20:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"The main purpose of the present paper is analyzing magnetic brane solutions of cubic quasi-topological gravity in the presence of a linear electromagnetic Maxwell field and a nonlinear electromagnetic Born-Infeld field. We show that the mentioned magnetic solutions have no curvature singularity and also no horizons, but we observe that there is a conic geometry with a related deficit angle. We obtain the metric function and deficit angle and consider their behavior. We show that the attributes of our solution are dependent on cubic quasi-topological coefficient and the Gauss-Bonnet parameter."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1609.06571","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1609.06571","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:00.685402+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1609.06571v2","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:00.685402+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1609.06571","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:00.685402+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2FBVQOXFFSE4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:55.572404+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:55.572404+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2FBVQOXF","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:55.572404+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.13002","citing_title":"Cosmologically viable non-polynomial quasi-topological gravity: explicit models, $\\Lambda$CDM limit and observational constraints","ref_index":47,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW53X3QMN6GZ5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW53X3QMN6GZ5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW53X3QMN6GZ5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW53X3QMN6GZ5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2FBVQOXF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW53X3QMN6GZ5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW53X3QMN6GZ5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2FBVQOXF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1609.06571&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW53X3QMN6GZ5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW53X3QMN6GZ5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW53X3QMN6GZ5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW53X3QMN6GZ5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW53X3QMN6GZ5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW53X3QMN6GZ5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2FBVQOXFFSE4EZW53X3QMN6GZ5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:00.685402+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:00.685402+00:00"}