{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML4DKPJXOWRR","short_pith_number":"pith:2FVIBEPI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d16a8091e8b20e36798be0d4f4ddd68c7e2841eca4c71b5e3aada0e6039754cc","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.14501","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Towards a Perspectivist Turn in Argument Quality Assessment","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Gabriella Lapesa, Henning Wachsmuth, Julia Romberg, Maximilian Maurer","submitted_at":"2025-02-20T12:30:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"The assessment of argument quality depends on well-established logical, rhetorical, and dialectical properties that are unavoidably subjective: multiple valid assessments may exist, there is no unequivocal ground truth. This aligns with recent paths in machine learning, which embrace the co-existence of different perspectives. However, this potential remains largely unexplored in NLP research on argument quality. One crucial reason seems to be the yet unexplored availability of suitable datasets. We fill this gap by conducting a systematic review of argument quality datasets. We assign them to"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.14501","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-02-20T12:30:26Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"487ab36f43215e8312438df6fad2c5180e827188b23640845ffeb653fb7052ef","abstract_canon_sha256":"700e4a726d8c6f4a22b47dc9fe92013b681c66c12f583388ca36b55b35979d35"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:27.629195Z","signature_b64":"wvRucfCkm0kznZKv+FKCPJZM/0F0pOmrmJCU34xFYPZbAzaF4z1H2TL3cvdLFsXTSkcD7VXrtamRy/u/8Bt/DA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d16a8091e8b20e36798be0d4f4ddd68c7e2841eca4c71b5e3aada0e6039754cc","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:27.628745Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:27.628745Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Towards a Perspectivist Turn in Argument Quality Assessment","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Gabriella Lapesa, Henning Wachsmuth, Julia Romberg, Maximilian Maurer","submitted_at":"2025-02-20T12:30:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"The assessment of argument quality depends on well-established logical, rhetorical, and dialectical properties that are unavoidably subjective: multiple valid assessments may exist, there is no unequivocal ground truth. This aligns with recent paths in machine learning, which embrace the co-existence of different perspectives. However, this potential remains largely unexplored in NLP research on argument quality. One crucial reason seems to be the yet unexplored availability of suitable datasets. We fill this gap by conducting a systematic review of argument quality datasets. We assign them to"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.14501","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.14501/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.14501","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:27.628804+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.14501v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:27.628804+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.14501","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:27.628804+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2FVIBEPIWIHD","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:27.628804+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:27.628804+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2FVIBEPI","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:27.628804+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML4DKPJXOWRR","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML4DKPJXOWRR.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML4DKPJXOWRR/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML4DKPJXOWRR/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2FVIBEPI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML4DKPJXOWRR","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML4DKPJXOWRR.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2FVIBEPI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.14501&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML4DKPJXOWRR/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML4DKPJXOWRR/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML4DKPJXOWRR/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML4DKPJXOWRR/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML4DKPJXOWRR/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML4DKPJXOWRR/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2FVIBEPIWIHDM6ML4DKPJXOWRR/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:27.628804+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:27.628804+00:00"}