{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:2HVEDHY6V62MA4MLTMJ6RBRXFD","short_pith_number":"pith:2HVEDHY6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d1ea419f1eafb4c0718b9b13e8863728e814932dcbc98371abd29772a99b7ef9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2501.08641","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Reassessing the Role of Chain-of-Thought in Sentiment Analysis: Insights and Limitations","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Kaiyuan Zheng, Lei Li, Qinghua Zhao","submitted_at":"2025-01-15T08:07:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"The relationship between language and thought remains an unresolved philosophical issue. Existing viewpoints can be broadly categorized into two schools: one asserting their independence, and another arguing that language constrains thought. In the context of large language models, this debate raises a crucial question: Does a language model's grasp of semantic meaning depend on thought processes? To explore this issue, we investigate whether reasoning techniques can facilitate semantic understanding. Specifically, we conceptualize thought as reasoning, employ chain-of-thought prompting as a r"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2501.08641","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-01-15T08:07:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"8116e25ae68d4415e4726ef46f428cacbf1dacfaf4b033e73d81406f6217b694","abstract_canon_sha256":"0024210af5c78115d82adfe84194d38fde722f85cf7fd04885db630417da874b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:22.322777Z","signature_b64":"O1Tr84Vv/F3wBkUUgoUUUEFf3X5DEyv7Uyiizos9idV6Tt9NyPXDfho1NZtGcVih9EWxyO+2FoTJktOUGoCKBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d1ea419f1eafb4c0718b9b13e8863728e814932dcbc98371abd29772a99b7ef9","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:22.322279Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:22.322279Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Reassessing the Role of Chain-of-Thought in Sentiment Analysis: Insights and Limitations","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Kaiyuan Zheng, Lei Li, Qinghua Zhao","submitted_at":"2025-01-15T08:07:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"The relationship between language and thought remains an unresolved philosophical issue. Existing viewpoints can be broadly categorized into two schools: one asserting their independence, and another arguing that language constrains thought. In the context of large language models, this debate raises a crucial question: Does a language model's grasp of semantic meaning depend on thought processes? To explore this issue, we investigate whether reasoning techniques can facilitate semantic understanding. Specifically, we conceptualize thought as reasoning, employ chain-of-thought prompting as a r"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2501.08641","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2501.08641/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2501.08641","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:22.322343+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2501.08641v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:22.322343+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.08641","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:22.322343+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2HVEDHY6V62M","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:22.322343+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2HVEDHY6V62MA4ML","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:22.322343+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2HVEDHY6","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:22.322343+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.16491","citing_title":"LLaMAs Have Feelings Too: Unveiling Sentiment and Emotion Representations in LLaMA Models Through Probing","ref_index":1804,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2HVEDHY6V62MA4MLTMJ6RBRXFD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2HVEDHY6V62MA4MLTMJ6RBRXFD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2HVEDHY6V62MA4MLTMJ6RBRXFD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2HVEDHY6V62MA4MLTMJ6RBRXFD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2HVEDHY6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2HVEDHY6V62MA4MLTMJ6RBRXFD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2HVEDHY6V62MA4MLTMJ6RBRXFD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2HVEDHY6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2501.08641&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2HVEDHY6V62MA4MLTMJ6RBRXFD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2HVEDHY6V62MA4MLTMJ6RBRXFD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2HVEDHY6V62MA4MLTMJ6RBRXFD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2HVEDHY6V62MA4MLTMJ6RBRXFD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2HVEDHY6V62MA4MLTMJ6RBRXFD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2HVEDHY6V62MA4MLTMJ6RBRXFD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2HVEDHY6V62MA4MLTMJ6RBRXFD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:22.322343+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:22.322343+00:00"}