{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:2LJHODZQPFQSD3IUSVDNW4AZWA","short_pith_number":"pith:2LJHODZQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d2d2770f30796121ed149546db7019b004d710e202a3b597e0d6a35e97f77938","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2102.09692","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-making","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Cognitive forcing interventions reduce overreliance on incorrect AI suggestions by prompting deeper analysis.","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Maja Barbara Malaya, Zana Bu\\c{c}inca","submitted_at":"2021-02-19T00:38:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"People supported by AI-powered decision support tools frequently overrely on the AI: they accept an AI's suggestion even when that suggestion is wrong. Adding explanations to the AI decisions does not appear to reduce the overreliance and some studies suggest that it might even increase it. Informed by the dual-process theory of cognition, we posit that people rarely engage analytically with each individual AI recommendation and explanation, and instead develop general heuristics about whether and when to follow the AI suggestions. Building on prior research on medical decision-making, we desi"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2102.09692","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2021-02-19T00:38:53Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"0ae941820402a0c948f4e9ad8174dacb0ffe7ce4a807b1ecd5a6267e6aebc679","abstract_canon_sha256":"4db9cb06682e37cebf6114593e6a1bcccd28cbd82cb885c0fb32a8a8ad4b1380"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.649863Z","signature_b64":"GnngsFozdnEIYvEUfAj2l+jFiQ+SJiqlbvzlXBDZSn51b/GHBgklYJ6hbdk9ejymwbMahGDzJWvfwvAyJWW6CA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d2d2770f30796121ed149546db7019b004d710e202a3b597e0d6a35e97f77938","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.649175Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.649175Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-making","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Cognitive forcing interventions reduce overreliance on incorrect AI suggestions by prompting deeper analysis.","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Maja Barbara Malaya, Zana Bu\\c{c}inca","submitted_at":"2021-02-19T00:38:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"People supported by AI-powered decision support tools frequently overrely on the AI: they accept an AI's suggestion even when that suggestion is wrong. Adding explanations to the AI decisions does not appear to reduce the overreliance and some studies suggest that it might even increase it. Informed by the dual-process theory of cognition, we posit that people rarely engage analytically with each individual AI recommendation and explanation, and instead develop general heuristics about whether and when to follow the AI suggestions. Building on prior research on medical decision-making, we desi"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"The results demonstrate that cognitive forcing significantly reduced overreliance compared to the simple explainable AI approaches.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the three cognitive forcing interventions actually compel deeper analytical engagement with AI explanations rather than simply adding friction or changing behavior through other mechanisms.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Cognitive forcing interventions reduce overreliance on AI recommendations more than simple explanations, with effects moderated by individual need for cognition.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Cognitive forcing interventions reduce overreliance on incorrect AI suggestions by prompting deeper analysis.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"14b8a5ea0d55c6f3a3000dd8ced44791b6bc49865248f248b5a8f6eacb20b35b"},"source":{"id":"2102.09692","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"2b1c67b5-5b87-438b-babe-4e589c81148a","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T17:58:59.505519Z","strongest_claim":"The results demonstrate that cognitive forcing significantly reduced overreliance compared to the simple explainable AI approaches.","one_line_summary":"Cognitive forcing interventions reduce overreliance on AI recommendations more than simple explanations, with effects moderated by individual need for cognition.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the three cognitive forcing interventions actually compel deeper analytical engagement with AI explanations rather than simply adding friction or changing behavior through other mechanisms.","pith_extraction_headline":"Cognitive forcing interventions reduce overreliance on incorrect AI suggestions by prompting deeper analysis."},"references":{"count":67,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2019,"title":"Gagan Bansal, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Walter S Lasecki, Daniel S Weld, and Eric Horvitz. 2019. Beyond accuracy: The role of mental models in human-AI team performance. In Proceedings of the AAAI Con","work_id":"6231c055-8c5c-40d0-9d49-e106ba01b5b1","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2021,"title":"Gagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhu, Raymond Fok, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, and Daniel S Weld. 2021. Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complemen","work_id":"20fb0e10-d2d5-4cb9-b138-71a192d64750","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2013,"title":"Dale J Barr, Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers, and Harry J Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of memory and language 68, 3 (2013), 255–27","work_id":"01e3975a-fa6e-419f-bf21-e922455ffe22","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2008,"title":"Eta S Berner and Mark L Graber. 2008. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine.The American journal of medicine 121, 5 (2008), S2–S23","work_id":"62d7cb31-c990-45a7-98ac-643bec8defff","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.24963/ijcai","year":2020,"title":"doi: 10.24963/ijcai","work_id":"4bb4cb61-e96c-4228-bad4-24de00fdc5ad","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":67,"snapshot_sha256":"0a4a0a89c376e10405e25096697189369e19b8ba79a9c841cb45e986a3adc7ba","internal_anchors":1},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"724bb3e2abc0b5a514b35e4e57de0186099c51d7c90b31a391ed62450b99cdbf"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2102.09692","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.649292+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2102.09692v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.649292+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2102.09692","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.649292+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2LJHODZQPFQS","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:33.725879+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2LJHODZQPFQSD3IU","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:33.725879+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2LJHODZQ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:33.725879+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":45,"internal_anchor_count":45,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.08009","citing_title":"From Execution to Education: A Bloom-Aligned Framework for Measuring Educational Control in LLMs","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.06101","citing_title":"Agents That Teach: Towards Designing Incidental Learning Back into AI-Assisted Software Development","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.31762","citing_title":"Investigating LLM-Powered Dissenting Minority Support in Power-Imbalanced Group Decision-Making: Counterargument and Mediation as Intervention Strategies","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.24729","citing_title":"\"It Felt a Bit Eerie\": Exploring Humanlike Interactions During Collaborative Writing with an Artificial Agent","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.25856","citing_title":"Explaining Too Much? Understanding How Large Language Model Reasoning Traces Influence Performance and Metacognition","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05391","citing_title":"Human oversight of agentic systems in practice: Examining the oversight work, challenges, and heuristics of developers using software agents","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05023","citing_title":"Scaling Expert Feedback with Reflective Edit Propagation in Compositional Knowledge Bases","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.06702","citing_title":"Adversarial Co-Thinking: Calibration and Triangulation Across Multiple GenAI Tools in HCI Writing","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07283","citing_title":"A Model of Integrated Information Processing in Human-AI Interaction","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.10177","citing_title":"VArify: A Visual Analytics System for Verifying Knowledge Enhanced Large Language Model Responses in Food Science","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.18671","citing_title":"HANSEL: Extracting Breadcrumbs from Web Agent Trajectories for Interactive Verification","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.23491","citing_title":"Hallucinations in Organization-backed AI advisors: Evidence about Skepticism, Verification, and Reliance in Goal-Directed Use","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.25489","citing_title":"When LLM Rationales Become User-Facing: Effects on Trust Perception, Decision-Making, and Gaze Behaviors","ref_index":90,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.07813","citing_title":"Agentivism: a learning theory for the age of artificial intelligence","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.10551","citing_title":"An Empirical Study to Understand How Students Use ChatGPT for Writing Essays","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.16272","citing_title":"Beyond Compliance: How AI Could Help Creative Writers by Refusing Them","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20512","citing_title":"Framing an AI with Values Reduces AI Reliance in AI-supported Writing Tasks","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.10930","citing_title":"Evaluating the False Trust Engendered by LLM Explanations","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19838","citing_title":"From Role to Person: Trust Calibration Challenges in Twin Agents","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15322","citing_title":"Overreliance in Writing Tasks: Exploring Similarity-Based Measures of AI Influence on Writing and Proposing a Reflective Writing Interface Intervention","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.18326","citing_title":"Interdependent Navigation and Pragmatic Disengagement: How Older Korean Immigrants Selectively Engage with Digital Technologies","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.10746","citing_title":"RECAP: Transparent Inference-Time Emotion Alignment for Medical Dialogue Systems","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.11954","citing_title":"VizCopilot: Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Enterprise Chatbots with Context Visualization","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.22440","citing_title":"AI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Values from Casual Conversations","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.06183","citing_title":"The Impact of Response Latency and Task Type on Human-LLM Interaction and Perception","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2LJHODZQPFQSD3IUSVDNW4AZWA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2LJHODZQPFQSD3IUSVDNW4AZWA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2LJHODZQPFQSD3IUSVDNW4AZWA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2LJHODZQPFQSD3IUSVDNW4AZWA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2LJHODZQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2LJHODZQPFQSD3IUSVDNW4AZWA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2LJHODZQPFQSD3IUSVDNW4AZWA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2LJHODZQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2102.09692&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2LJHODZQPFQSD3IUSVDNW4AZWA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2LJHODZQPFQSD3IUSVDNW4AZWA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2LJHODZQPFQSD3IUSVDNW4AZWA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2LJHODZQPFQSD3IUSVDNW4AZWA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2LJHODZQPFQSD3IUSVDNW4AZWA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2LJHODZQPFQSD3IUSVDNW4AZWA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2LJHODZQPFQSD3IUSVDNW4AZWA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.649292+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:50.649292+00:00"}