{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNCZXZYXCTQO6","short_pith_number":"pith:2LVJO2YK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d2ea976b0afadc4d95a2cdf38b8a70779bec63b519da617c9df83047935bda11","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.04572","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Demonstrations of Integrity Attacks in Multi-Agent Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Can Zheng, Tianxing He, Xiaoning Dong, Yuhan Cao","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T02:44:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding, code generation, and complex planning. Simultaneously, Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) have garnered attention for their potential to enable cooperation among distributed agents. However, from a multi-party perspective, MAS could be vulnerable to malicious agents that exploit the system to serve self-interests without disrupting its core functionality. This work explores integrity attacks where malicious agents employ subtle prompt manipulation to bias MAS operations and gain various benefits. F"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.04572","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T02:44:49Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"486ed1a0803b07676aee6fdec3fd36452005a3e186a39053d66cc16e092a6b16","abstract_canon_sha256":"723b3b8dd0ae0890a30f3e586830f4ca8bcb30240d9dc4c33b2217ac852b7f6a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:16.895857Z","signature_b64":"CW6Ih5SpI0Bq3UE37ZL5QheQFkydMNC14OsUjD+JUvpWQu4JfNI+X8CIKob5xn60IvXY2tZn+U/IuagyCcdTCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d2ea976b0afadc4d95a2cdf38b8a70779bec63b519da617c9df83047935bda11","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:16.895386Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:16.895386Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Demonstrations of Integrity Attacks in Multi-Agent Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Can Zheng, Tianxing He, Xiaoning Dong, Yuhan Cao","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T02:44:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding, code generation, and complex planning. Simultaneously, Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) have garnered attention for their potential to enable cooperation among distributed agents. However, from a multi-party perspective, MAS could be vulnerable to malicious agents that exploit the system to serve self-interests without disrupting its core functionality. This work explores integrity attacks where malicious agents employ subtle prompt manipulation to bias MAS operations and gain various benefits. F"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.04572","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.04572/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.04572","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:16.895449+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.04572v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:16.895449+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.04572","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:16.895449+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2LVJO2YK7LOE","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:16.895449+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNC","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:16.895449+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2LVJO2YK","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:16.895449+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01019","citing_title":"Toward a Unified Security and Privacy Framework for AI-Native 6G Networks","ref_index":134,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.10749","citing_title":"Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation","ref_index":253,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13213","citing_title":"Hierarchical Attacks for Multi-Modal Multi-Agent Reasoning","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12364","citing_title":"Attacks and Mitigations for Distributed Governance of Agentic AI under Byzantine Adversaries","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNCZXZYXCTQO6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNCZXZYXCTQO6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNCZXZYXCTQO6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNCZXZYXCTQO6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2LVJO2YK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNCZXZYXCTQO6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNCZXZYXCTQO6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2LVJO2YK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.04572&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNCZXZYXCTQO6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNCZXZYXCTQO6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNCZXZYXCTQO6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNCZXZYXCTQO6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNCZXZYXCTQO6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNCZXZYXCTQO6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2LVJO2YK7LOE3FNCZXZYXCTQO6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:16.895449+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:16.895449+00:00"}