{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:2MSZS5PRAMEXOACADCOE2I3A7G","short_pith_number":"pith:2MSZS5PR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d3259975f10309770040189c4d2360f990301ce34659fd7fb2556c9e10e25da3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.12717","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The End Justifies the Mean: A Linear Ranking Rule for Proportional Sequential Decisions","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"The angular mean of voter vectors satisfies long-run individual proportionality for repeated linear rankings.","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Bailey Flanigan, Carmel Baharav, Maximilian T. Wittmann, Niclas Boehmer","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T20:26:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"AI alignment and participatory design motivate a new democratic design problem: how to collectively choose a decision rule to use repeatedly. We study this problem for linear ranking rules, which repeatedly rank items $x_j$ within batches $X=(x_1,\\dots,x_m)\\in(\\mathbb{R}^d)^m$, where each item's ranking is dictated by its score $\\langle \\theta^*,x_j\\rangle$ according to a fixed scoring vector $\\theta^*$. Given voters' preferred scoring vectors $\\theta^{(1)},\\dots,\\theta^{(n)}$ and their population fractions $\\alpha^{(1)},\\dots,\\alpha^{(n)}$, we ask how to choose a collective vector $\\theta^*$ "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.12717","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.GT","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T20:26:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"2033f25ac2c4fe99f6388d8642007658c5c673bb3d92d64cc7094117ca7b4ffc","abstract_canon_sha256":"d75dc86c1844e7a8dd84391413281390a657c75edf6c0027e3995c1dc7b68d8d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49.458984Z","signature_b64":"T+VNz+7mND02Rmy8R2WDH71RuKw//dV3ilTfvnwNXMSFOK27j4GZ9LzHSs2ShrKEbwgWYM4s06sRFCNxBgd6Cw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d3259975f10309770040189c4d2360f990301ce34659fd7fb2556c9e10e25da3","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49.458299Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49.458299Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The End Justifies the Mean: A Linear Ranking Rule for Proportional Sequential Decisions","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"The angular mean of voter vectors satisfies long-run individual proportionality for repeated linear rankings.","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Bailey Flanigan, Carmel Baharav, Maximilian T. Wittmann, Niclas Boehmer","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T20:26:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"AI alignment and participatory design motivate a new democratic design problem: how to collectively choose a decision rule to use repeatedly. We study this problem for linear ranking rules, which repeatedly rank items $x_j$ within batches $X=(x_1,\\dots,x_m)\\in(\\mathbb{R}^d)^m$, where each item's ranking is dictated by its score $\\langle \\theta^*,x_j\\rangle$ according to a fixed scoring vector $\\theta^*$. Given voters' preferred scoring vectors $\\theta^{(1)},\\dots,\\theta^{(n)}$ and their population fractions $\\alpha^{(1)},\\dots,\\alpha^{(n)}$, we ask how to choose a collective vector $\\theta^*$ "},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Our main result is that, surprisingly, there is a simple rule that does satisfy long-run IP: the angular mean, the spherical analog of the arithmetic mean.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That long-run average proportionality is acceptable even when per-batch outcomes can deviate substantially, and that voter preferences remain fixed across batches.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"The angular mean of voter scoring vectors satisfies long-run individual proportionality for sequential linear ranking decisions.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"The angular mean of voter vectors satisfies long-run individual proportionality for repeated linear rankings.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"c8a0a0cf58106f9c53006213f855fd3b6aca16c14a34bcadcccf662a3b1d7e15"},"source":{"id":"2605.12717","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"ce602db4-2870-4808-94e8-ad1673f33dcb","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-14T19:52:24.096293Z","strongest_claim":"Our main result is that, surprisingly, there is a simple rule that does satisfy long-run IP: the angular mean, the spherical analog of the arithmetic mean.","one_line_summary":"The angular mean of voter scoring vectors satisfies long-run individual proportionality for sequential linear ranking decisions.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That long-run average proportionality is acceptable even when per-batch outcomes can deviate substantially, and that voter preferences remain fixed across batches.","pith_extraction_headline":"The angular mean of voter vectors satisfies long-run individual proportionality for repeated linear rankings."},"references":{"count":50,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2013,"title":"On the convergence of gradient descent for finding the Riemannian center of mass","work_id":"63fa1ffd-f1c8-440a-ad4c-688565a2a94d","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2018,"title":"The moral machine experiment","work_id":"f3db6ff3-741e-4e73-9145-61daa7f87012","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2024,"title":"On the stability of moral preferences: A problem with computational elicitation methods","work_id":"2aa99587-1a15-4b27-ace5-d9eff8d192c7","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2024,"title":"Optimal budget aggregation with single-peaked preferences","work_id":"6fe369b5-00d3-4d1b-9767-8e6df37f8ff6","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2021,"title":"Justified representation for perpetual voting","work_id":"3a0ce6bc-8d7b-46eb-aa02-c68e86208775","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":50,"snapshot_sha256":"bf3a5ee429ad6fde8e84e430e1590463b2bd60f14745e807fca9c078b49f6696","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":1,"snapshot_sha256":"57ef7755063a80e809e2cef5b1a1a2f6623d8549d7389426ed99fa04dc846fa6"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.12717","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49.458420+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.12717v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49.458420+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.12717","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49.458420+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2MSZS5PRAMEX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2MSZS5PRAMEXOACA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2MSZS5PR","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":1,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2MSZS5PRAMEXOACADCOE2I3A7G","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2MSZS5PRAMEXOACADCOE2I3A7G.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2MSZS5PRAMEXOACADCOE2I3A7G/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2MSZS5PRAMEXOACADCOE2I3A7G/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2MSZS5PR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2MSZS5PRAMEXOACADCOE2I3A7G","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2MSZS5PRAMEXOACADCOE2I3A7G.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2MSZS5PR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.12717&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2MSZS5PRAMEXOACADCOE2I3A7G/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2MSZS5PRAMEXOACADCOE2I3A7G/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2MSZS5PRAMEXOACADCOE2I3A7G/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2MSZS5PRAMEXOACADCOE2I3A7G/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2MSZS5PRAMEXOACADCOE2I3A7G/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2MSZS5PRAMEXOACADCOE2I3A7G/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2MSZS5PRAMEXOACADCOE2I3A7G/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49.458420+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49.458420+00:00"}