{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M7VXCXCCGCC","short_pith_number":"pith:2QTTMRA7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d42736441f498f3c7b8cfd6e2b884610a5f9f75508cd255b7944f00c0aa5640d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2310.15264","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Towards Possibilities & Impossibilities of AI-generated Text Detection: A Survey","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Amrit Singh Bedi, Dinesh Manocha, Furong Huang, Jonas Geiping, Soumya Suvra Ghosal, Souradip Chakraborty","submitted_at":"2023-10-23T18:11:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the domain of natural language processing (NLP) with remarkable capabilities of generating human-like text responses. However, despite these advancements, several works in the existing literature have raised serious concerns about the potential misuse of LLMs such as spreading misinformation, generating fake news, plagiarism in academia, and contaminating the web. To address these concerns, a consensus among the research community is to develop algorithmic solutions to detect AI-generated text. The basic idea is that whenever we can tell if the "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2310.15264","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-10-23T18:11:32Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"d5fbd53f8adb998b821c771ffed9ca853eb7654841d56f2a96a3cba650cdb1b4","abstract_canon_sha256":"877524f5866f31394cef71ee33c9e581177786cf3f763a42c5b50f20ed72df8a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:23.700936Z","signature_b64":"mSMZBZbEL9Wkwf4R0trxyi1bzXcIicuSuEjyXqC4HZJTKkxF00CYYc38v70sEydmEIhmrgZPtJv9vsNkOzaPDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d42736441f498f3c7b8cfd6e2b884610a5f9f75508cd255b7944f00c0aa5640d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:23.700421Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:23.700421Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Towards Possibilities & Impossibilities of AI-generated Text Detection: A Survey","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Amrit Singh Bedi, Dinesh Manocha, Furong Huang, Jonas Geiping, Soumya Suvra Ghosal, Souradip Chakraborty","submitted_at":"2023-10-23T18:11:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the domain of natural language processing (NLP) with remarkable capabilities of generating human-like text responses. However, despite these advancements, several works in the existing literature have raised serious concerns about the potential misuse of LLMs such as spreading misinformation, generating fake news, plagiarism in academia, and contaminating the web. To address these concerns, a consensus among the research community is to develop algorithmic solutions to detect AI-generated text. The basic idea is that whenever we can tell if the "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2310.15264","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2310.15264/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2310.15264","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:23.700490+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2310.15264v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:23.700490+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2310.15264","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:23.700490+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2QTTMRA7JGHT","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:23.700490+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:23.700490+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2QTTMRA7","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:23.700490+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.31602","citing_title":"Robust Text Watermarking for Large Language Models via Dual Semantic Embeddings","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.31602","citing_title":"Robust Text Watermarking for Large Language Models via Dual Semantic Embeddings","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.18333","citing_title":"Position: LLM Watermarking Should Align Stakeholders' Incentives for Practical Adoption","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.23146","citing_title":"Why AI-Generated Text Detection Fails: Evidence from Explainable AI Beyond Benchmark Accuracy","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M7VXCXCCGCC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M7VXCXCCGCC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M7VXCXCCGCC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M7VXCXCCGCC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2QTTMRA7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M7VXCXCCGCC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M7VXCXCCGCC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2QTTMRA7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2310.15264&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M7VXCXCCGCC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M7VXCXCCGCC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M7VXCXCCGCC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M7VXCXCCGCC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M7VXCXCCGCC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M7VXCXCCGCC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2QTTMRA7JGHTY64M7VXCXCCGCC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:23.700490+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:23.700490+00:00"}