{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J3KEW3NCWC7","short_pith_number":"pith:2SS6RGDK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d4a5e8986a8ef1b4d369da896db45617e71ce3aac7b3ac7590f3a0a4735e9794","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2308.12466","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 Good Poker Players? -- A Pre-Flop Analysis","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Akshat Gupta","submitted_at":"2023-08-23T23:16:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Since the introduction of ChatGPT and GPT-4, these models have been tested across a large number of tasks. Their adeptness across domains is evident, but their aptitude in playing games, and specifically their aptitude in the realm of poker has remained unexplored. Poker is a game that requires decision making under uncertainty and incomplete information. In this paper, we put ChatGPT and GPT-4 through the poker test and evaluate their poker skills. Our findings reveal that while both models display an advanced understanding of poker, encompassing concepts like the valuation of starting hands,"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2308.12466","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-08-23T23:16:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.GT"],"title_canon_sha256":"b0835de089aff2281ec8e1390c20412ef831f4f03c4324851a77e8dd58f8ec48","abstract_canon_sha256":"f94790d7d71b99e64d2f581e9bd2f1f14457d1c29d4fd67bb928a6425d77317a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:26:56.091493Z","signature_b64":"f/tjCuUctOHIy7ku4cqFwqIiNLGIsD8ovgFZdDnw38SYOqZ6BwlspMqbWU58pKeFaAZoVnunml/HM2U6KE+fAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d4a5e8986a8ef1b4d369da896db45617e71ce3aac7b3ac7590f3a0a4735e9794","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:26:56.091068Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:26:56.091068Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 Good Poker Players? -- A Pre-Flop Analysis","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Akshat Gupta","submitted_at":"2023-08-23T23:16:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Since the introduction of ChatGPT and GPT-4, these models have been tested across a large number of tasks. Their adeptness across domains is evident, but their aptitude in playing games, and specifically their aptitude in the realm of poker has remained unexplored. Poker is a game that requires decision making under uncertainty and incomplete information. In this paper, we put ChatGPT and GPT-4 through the poker test and evaluate their poker skills. Our findings reveal that while both models display an advanced understanding of poker, encompassing concepts like the valuation of starting hands,"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2308.12466","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2308.12466/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2308.12466","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:26:56.091123+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2308.12466v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:26:56.091123+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2308.12466","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:26:56.091123+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2SS6RGDKR3Y3","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:26:56.091123+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:26:56.091123+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2SS6RGDK","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:26:56.091123+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.12012","citing_title":"Tracing LLM Reasoning Processes with Strategic Games: A Framework for Planning, Revision, and Resource-Constrained Decision Making","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J3KEW3NCWC7","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J3KEW3NCWC7.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J3KEW3NCWC7/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J3KEW3NCWC7/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2SS6RGDK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J3KEW3NCWC7","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J3KEW3NCWC7.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2SS6RGDK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2308.12466&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J3KEW3NCWC7/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J3KEW3NCWC7/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J3KEW3NCWC7/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J3KEW3NCWC7/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J3KEW3NCWC7/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J3KEW3NCWC7/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2SS6RGDKR3Y3JU3J3KEW3NCWC7/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:26:56.091123+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:26:56.091123+00:00"}