{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO3QGUVAEUBQ","short_pith_number":"pith:2TNAH6I5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d4da03f91dbcaf1cd88edc0d4a80940c0f7f51605afa132715e166b538eae90a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.07846","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A System for Automated Unit Test Generation Using Large Language Models and Assessment of Generated Test Suites","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Andrea Lops, Azzurra Ragone, Claudio Bartolini, Fedelucio Narducci, Michelantonio Trizio","submitted_at":"2024-08-14T23:02:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"Unit tests represent the most basic level of testing within the software testing lifecycle and are crucial to ensuring software correctness. Designing and creating unit tests is a costly and labor-intensive process that is ripe for automation. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to various aspects of software development, including unit test generation. Although several empirical studies evaluating LLMs' capabilities in test code generation exist, they primarily focus on simple scenarios, such as the straightforward generation of unit tests for individual methods. These ev"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.07846","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2024-08-14T23:02:16Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"d9931f7bbdfe257ee7c006620b26a0517d529fd34902a8606b0ab801a158d374","abstract_canon_sha256":"e9dfc2423eeea3b675276fc099ea27a8abbacfbc3033bf0ca3167d645b103ca2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:28.824191Z","signature_b64":"Yyl5E5mvmHyO+3P5i9MP7z8fuw+VZU3UptIY5WgbB1LydAbP6ImUJdYSmYRwKMXuDf9KRRx9GfeNAO1bVPCDDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d4da03f91dbcaf1cd88edc0d4a80940c0f7f51605afa132715e166b538eae90a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:28.823673Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:28.823673Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A System for Automated Unit Test Generation Using Large Language Models and Assessment of Generated Test Suites","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Andrea Lops, Azzurra Ragone, Claudio Bartolini, Fedelucio Narducci, Michelantonio Trizio","submitted_at":"2024-08-14T23:02:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"Unit tests represent the most basic level of testing within the software testing lifecycle and are crucial to ensuring software correctness. Designing and creating unit tests is a costly and labor-intensive process that is ripe for automation. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to various aspects of software development, including unit test generation. Although several empirical studies evaluating LLMs' capabilities in test code generation exist, they primarily focus on simple scenarios, such as the straightforward generation of unit tests for individual methods. These ev"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.07846","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.07846/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.07846","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:28.823742+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.07846v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:28.823742+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.07846","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:28.823742+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2TNAH6I5XSXR","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:28.823742+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:28.823742+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2TNAH6I5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:28.823742+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.18474","citing_title":"A Contemporary Survey of Large Language Model Assisted Program Analysis","ref_index":175,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO3QGUVAEUBQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO3QGUVAEUBQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO3QGUVAEUBQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO3QGUVAEUBQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2TNAH6I5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO3QGUVAEUBQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO3QGUVAEUBQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2TNAH6I5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.07846&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO3QGUVAEUBQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO3QGUVAEUBQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO3QGUVAEUBQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO3QGUVAEUBQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO3QGUVAEUBQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO3QGUVAEUBQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2TNAH6I5XSXRZWEO3QGUVAEUBQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:28.823742+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:28.823742+00:00"}