{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BIAIHQPBSXMK","short_pith_number":"pith:2UD6KWU6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d507e55a9e03e1787428020f07865762833df2a667492972d53b067b56728ea8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2501.05170","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"De-centering the (Traditional) User: Multistakeholder Evaluation of Recommender Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Dominik Kowald, Gediminas Adomavicius, Julia Neidhardt, J\\\"urgen Ziegler, Maria Soledad Pera, Nava Tintarev, \\\"Ozlem \\\"Ozg\\\"obek, Robin Burke, Toine Bogers, Tommaso Di Noia","submitted_at":"2025-01-09T11:44:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"Multistakeholder recommender systems are those that account for the impacts and preferences of multiple groups of individuals, not just the end users receiving recommendations. Due to their complexity, these systems cannot be evaluated strictly by the overall utility of a single stakeholder, as is often the case of more mainstream recommender system applications. In this article, we focus our discussion on the challenges of multistakeholder evaluation of recommender systems. We bring attention to the different aspects involved -- from the range of stakeholders involved (including but not limit"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2501.05170","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2025-01-09T11:44:49Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"1cc78e0f8e34fa1b6e3ecc0a153223acc47cc81ee3a759c12f7a66c4c49251ce","abstract_canon_sha256":"6edeebe44a253b801c8fb33752c889b18a28a67850050f44872e6eeda13d0dda"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:18.128995Z","signature_b64":"0r89QLzp7TfSIA7CA6r8zWY5xLU0SMll5HRyhnX9iCHHD1PcbmtJLdpCMRYU1pGuahYM9bXsvt0mCDq8AI14AA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d507e55a9e03e1787428020f07865762833df2a667492972d53b067b56728ea8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:18.128522Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:18.128522Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"De-centering the (Traditional) User: Multistakeholder Evaluation of Recommender Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Dominik Kowald, Gediminas Adomavicius, Julia Neidhardt, J\\\"urgen Ziegler, Maria Soledad Pera, Nava Tintarev, \\\"Ozlem \\\"Ozg\\\"obek, Robin Burke, Toine Bogers, Tommaso Di Noia","submitted_at":"2025-01-09T11:44:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"Multistakeholder recommender systems are those that account for the impacts and preferences of multiple groups of individuals, not just the end users receiving recommendations. Due to their complexity, these systems cannot be evaluated strictly by the overall utility of a single stakeholder, as is often the case of more mainstream recommender system applications. In this article, we focus our discussion on the challenges of multistakeholder evaluation of recommender systems. We bring attention to the different aspects involved -- from the range of stakeholders involved (including but not limit"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2501.05170","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2501.05170/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2501.05170","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:18.128577+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2501.05170v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:18.128577+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.05170","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:18.128577+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2UD6KWU6APQX","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:18.128577+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BI","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:18.128577+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2UD6KWU6","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:18.128577+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.06232","citing_title":"What Do Humanities Scholars Need? A User Model for Recommendation in Digital Archives","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.25032","citing_title":"Offline Evaluation Measures of Fairness in Recommender Systems","ref_index":32,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BIAIHQPBSXMK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BIAIHQPBSXMK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BIAIHQPBSXMK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BIAIHQPBSXMK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2UD6KWU6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BIAIHQPBSXMK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BIAIHQPBSXMK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2UD6KWU6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2501.05170&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BIAIHQPBSXMK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BIAIHQPBSXMK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BIAIHQPBSXMK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BIAIHQPBSXMK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BIAIHQPBSXMK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BIAIHQPBSXMK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2UD6KWU6APQXQ5BIAIHQPBSXMK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:18.128577+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:18.128577+00:00"}