{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S5W5UREDHOA","short_pith_number":"pith:2URTWEVU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d5233b12b42bec7583d2edbb4890677005c9258b7210a8f5790bd6d8232337e2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.07669","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Action of the axial $U(1)$ non-invertible symmetry on the 't~Hooft line operator: A simple argument","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-lat","authors_text":"Hiroshi Suzuki, Soma Onoda, Yamato Honda","submitted_at":"2024-05-13T11:58:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Employing the modified Villain lattice formulation of the axion quantum electrodynamics, we present an alternative and much simpler derivation of the conclusion of~Ref.~\\cite{Honda:2024sdz} that the sweep of the axial $U(1)$ non-invertible symmetry operator over the (non-genuine) gauge invariant 't~Hooft line operator with an integer magnetic charge does not leave any effect. The point is that such a 't~Hooft line can be represented by a boundary of a (non-topological) defect that is invariant under the axial transformation on the axion field."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.07669","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-lat","submitted_at":"2024-05-13T11:58:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"c433a89c927865566d3f6267cd95c9cd5b944105cd532d311bd5c4dff5c2bcae","abstract_canon_sha256":"183ac1b09151e4982a045beb517b9228056476a23df7ea75e7ca94dd25b2fdb1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:11.486279Z","signature_b64":"E5967vav3UnFzb3M7zp3qzdUPcCD/U4AUl/1NomhEJJxEBSizVvBXIQ9xX2/aYF/9fq6GddxmHo7wFrRPwgUDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d5233b12b42bec7583d2edbb4890677005c9258b7210a8f5790bd6d8232337e2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:11.485756Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:11.485756Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Action of the axial $U(1)$ non-invertible symmetry on the 't~Hooft line operator: A simple argument","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-lat","authors_text":"Hiroshi Suzuki, Soma Onoda, Yamato Honda","submitted_at":"2024-05-13T11:58:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Employing the modified Villain lattice formulation of the axion quantum electrodynamics, we present an alternative and much simpler derivation of the conclusion of~Ref.~\\cite{Honda:2024sdz} that the sweep of the axial $U(1)$ non-invertible symmetry operator over the (non-genuine) gauge invariant 't~Hooft line operator with an integer magnetic charge does not leave any effect. The point is that such a 't~Hooft line can be represented by a boundary of a (non-topological) defect that is invariant under the axial transformation on the axion field."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.07669","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.07669/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.07669","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:11.485816+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.07669v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:11.485816+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.07669","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:11.485816+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2URTWEVUFPWH","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:11.485816+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:11.485816+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2URTWEVU","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:11.485816+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.07293","citing_title":"Exotic theta terms in 2+1d fractonic field theory","ref_index":44,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.06307","citing_title":"Lattice chiral symmetry from bosons in 3+1d","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S5W5UREDHOA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S5W5UREDHOA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S5W5UREDHOA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S5W5UREDHOA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2URTWEVU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S5W5UREDHOA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S5W5UREDHOA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2URTWEVU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.07669&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S5W5UREDHOA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S5W5UREDHOA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S5W5UREDHOA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S5W5UREDHOA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S5W5UREDHOA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S5W5UREDHOA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2URTWEVUFPWHLA6S5W5UREDHOA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:11.485816+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:11.485816+00:00"}