{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM4M5JFC5YXL","short_pith_number":"pith:2UUIFEAL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d52882900b88a3f9b6cce33a928bb8bae6ac883571cd50e8a94ed61f172fb598","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2004.12921","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Equivalence of Grandfather and Information Antinomy Under Intervention","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"\\\"Amin Baumeler, Eleftherios Tselentis","submitted_at":"2020-04-27T16:34:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Causal loops, e.g., in time travel, come with two main problems. Most prominently, the grandfather antinomy describes the potentiality to inconsistencies: a problem of logical nature. The other problem is called information antinomy and is lesser known. Yet, it describes a variant of the former: There are not too few consistent solutions -- namely none -- but too many. At a first glance, the information antinomy does not seem as problematic as the grandfather antinomy, because there is no apparent logical contradiction. In this work we show that, however, both problems are equivalent under int"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2004.12921","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2020-04-27T16:34:51Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LO"],"title_canon_sha256":"60745152cf1f564a35a6fde5200bc83379445bb6bb34d342cc860befad6443df","abstract_canon_sha256":"11cf5b7a6890f1bf8ddbb0a361697557b5da6a45f5764a75db2a20c47b21400f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:23.788624Z","signature_b64":"pHpAxq0RRaPSjaCpQzNS8tGvOr9vIZYj2wiiUMtsdYya+fbRJd9G5uoLUDmgox5g3NdI0bKAtExe1cwtc+LiCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d52882900b88a3f9b6cce33a928bb8bae6ac883571cd50e8a94ed61f172fb598","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:23.788208Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:23.788208Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Equivalence of Grandfather and Information Antinomy Under Intervention","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"\\\"Amin Baumeler, Eleftherios Tselentis","submitted_at":"2020-04-27T16:34:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Causal loops, e.g., in time travel, come with two main problems. Most prominently, the grandfather antinomy describes the potentiality to inconsistencies: a problem of logical nature. The other problem is called information antinomy and is lesser known. Yet, it describes a variant of the former: There are not too few consistent solutions -- namely none -- but too many. At a first glance, the information antinomy does not seem as problematic as the grandfather antinomy, because there is no apparent logical contradiction. In this work we show that, however, both problems are equivalent under int"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2004.12921","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2004.12921/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2004.12921","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:23.788265+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2004.12921v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:23.788265+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2004.12921","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:23.788265+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2UUIFEALRCR7","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:23.788265+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:23.788265+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2UUIFEAL","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:23.788265+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.07276","citing_title":"Revisiting Certainty Equivalence: The Structural Coupling Between Estimation and Control in Underactuated Nonlinear Systems","ref_index":49,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM4M5JFC5YXL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM4M5JFC5YXL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM4M5JFC5YXL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM4M5JFC5YXL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2UUIFEAL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM4M5JFC5YXL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM4M5JFC5YXL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2UUIFEAL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2004.12921&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM4M5JFC5YXL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM4M5JFC5YXL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM4M5JFC5YXL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM4M5JFC5YXL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM4M5JFC5YXL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM4M5JFC5YXL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2UUIFEALRCR7TNWM4M5JFC5YXL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:23.788265+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T03:11:23.788265+00:00"}