{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27LVOYZY73WN","short_pith_number":"pith:2W4F7NXB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d5b85fb6e17ff2928f5f5d5d8ce3fbb37f932707b525cbcd66ffd340374443f3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1607.02562","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"CPDY: Extending the Dolev-Yao Attacker with Physical-Layer Interactions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Marco Rocchetto, Nils Ole Tippenhauer","submitted_at":"2016-07-09T02:45:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"We propose extensions to the Dolev-Yao attacker model to make it suitable for arguments about security of Cyber-Physical Systems. The Dolev-Yao attacker model uses a set of rules to define potential actions by an attacker with respect to messages (i.e. information) exchanged between parties during a protocol execution. As the traditional Dolev-Yao model considers only information (exchanged over a channel controlled by the attacker), the model cannot directly be used to argue about the security of cyber-physical systems where physical-layer interactions are possible. Our Dolev-Yao extension, c"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1607.02562","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2016-07-09T02:45:15Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"40cf2d3dcc5f6991fadb08d38c4156f7f8c6d79c979bd696c0bd461679820b84","abstract_canon_sha256":"e081a3a602641435d90b237e2caa74009f1a67ba5ad6e52b96d6ef2d3f1d9423"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:10:45.455098Z","signature_b64":"pBI86gS7CM/hohytAsifdn6FFM9+Q2jeE22BcNkLzqcECwOOgfD57TQzjtp6cD7PyziQPIgJgPOXD343AxbVAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d5b85fb6e17ff2928f5f5d5d8ce3fbb37f932707b525cbcd66ffd340374443f3","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:10:45.454722Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:10:45.454722Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"CPDY: Extending the Dolev-Yao Attacker with Physical-Layer Interactions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Marco Rocchetto, Nils Ole Tippenhauer","submitted_at":"2016-07-09T02:45:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"We propose extensions to the Dolev-Yao attacker model to make it suitable for arguments about security of Cyber-Physical Systems. The Dolev-Yao attacker model uses a set of rules to define potential actions by an attacker with respect to messages (i.e. information) exchanged between parties during a protocol execution. As the traditional Dolev-Yao model considers only information (exchanged over a channel controlled by the attacker), the model cannot directly be used to argue about the security of cyber-physical systems where physical-layer interactions are possible. Our Dolev-Yao extension, c"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1607.02562","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1607.02562","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:10:45.454786+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1607.02562v3","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:10:45.454786+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1607.02562","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:10:45.454786+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2W4F7NXBP7ZJ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:55.572404+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:55.572404+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2W4F7NXB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:55.572404+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21606","citing_title":"Process-Mining of Hypertraces: Enabling Scalable Formal Security Verification of (Automotive) Network Architectures","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27LVOYZY73WN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27LVOYZY73WN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27LVOYZY73WN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27LVOYZY73WN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2W4F7NXB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27LVOYZY73WN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27LVOYZY73WN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2W4F7NXB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1607.02562&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27LVOYZY73WN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27LVOYZY73WN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27LVOYZY73WN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27LVOYZY73WN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27LVOYZY73WN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27LVOYZY73WN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2W4F7NXBP7ZJFD27LVOYZY73WN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:10:45.454786+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:10:45.454786+00:00"}