{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:2WH6WA76IQFDLJTBG5I2S74KHP","short_pith_number":"pith:2WH6WA76","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d58feb03fe440a35a6613751a97f8a3bc01723004022f2cd0c76f97bf7c38e46","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1805.02475","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Comparative evaluation of instrument segmentation and tracking methods in minimally invasive surgery","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Anthony Agustinos, Beat M\\\"uller-Stich, Danail Stoyanov, Daniil Pakhomov, Hannes Kenngott, Lena Maier-Hein, Luis Garcia-Peraza-Herrera, Martin Thoma, Martin Wagner, Marvin Teichmann, Max Allan, Pamela Wochner, Raphael Sznitman, Sandrine Voros, Sebastian Bodenstedt, Sebastien Ourselin, Stefanie Speidel, Thomas Kurmann, Tom Vercauteren, Xiaofei Du","submitted_at":"2018-05-07T12:39:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Intraoperative segmentation and tracking of minimally invasive instruments is a prerequisite for computer- and robotic-assisted surgery. Since additional hardware like tracking systems or the robot encoders are cumbersome and lack accuracy, surgical vision is evolving as promising techniques to segment and track the instruments using only the endoscopic images. However, what is missing so far are common image data sets for consistent evaluation and benchmarking of algorithms against each other. The paper presents a comparative validation study of different vision-based methods for instrument s"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1805.02475","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2018-05-07T12:39:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"a18b21decd05d0fb81bded0bec2a9ac134698a3cf6f629f972da22056478c1c5","abstract_canon_sha256":"6592dff6daacb8b3080b9b94d0cc0c09d62dba14520a8c1a1ddd7ecb6124d7b1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:16:39.805204Z","signature_b64":"hM731wGIvdEK4/UlaBsqZ0mDMrttOkHEwlSnGtUlN0NkDIMmPyqrrabTLfBPyBxOoEs/GbpnX59cVZI9kyVzAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d58feb03fe440a35a6613751a97f8a3bc01723004022f2cd0c76f97bf7c38e46","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:16:39.804561Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:16:39.804561Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Comparative evaluation of instrument segmentation and tracking methods in minimally invasive surgery","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Anthony Agustinos, Beat M\\\"uller-Stich, Danail Stoyanov, Daniil Pakhomov, Hannes Kenngott, Lena Maier-Hein, Luis Garcia-Peraza-Herrera, Martin Thoma, Martin Wagner, Marvin Teichmann, Max Allan, Pamela Wochner, Raphael Sznitman, Sandrine Voros, Sebastian Bodenstedt, Sebastien Ourselin, Stefanie Speidel, Thomas Kurmann, Tom Vercauteren, Xiaofei Du","submitted_at":"2018-05-07T12:39:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Intraoperative segmentation and tracking of minimally invasive instruments is a prerequisite for computer- and robotic-assisted surgery. Since additional hardware like tracking systems or the robot encoders are cumbersome and lack accuracy, surgical vision is evolving as promising techniques to segment and track the instruments using only the endoscopic images. However, what is missing so far are common image data sets for consistent evaluation and benchmarking of algorithms against each other. The paper presents a comparative validation study of different vision-based methods for instrument s"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1805.02475","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1805.02475","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:16:39.804661+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1805.02475v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:16:39.804661+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1805.02475","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:16:39.804661+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2WH6WA76IQFD","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:02.567920+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2WH6WA76IQFDLJTB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:02.567920+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2WH6WA76","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:02.567920+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.23068","citing_title":"RoboSurg-VQA: A Multimodal Benchmark for Surgical Segmentation-Aware Visual Question Answering","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2WH6WA76IQFDLJTBG5I2S74KHP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2WH6WA76IQFDLJTBG5I2S74KHP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2WH6WA76IQFDLJTBG5I2S74KHP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2WH6WA76IQFDLJTBG5I2S74KHP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2WH6WA76"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2WH6WA76IQFDLJTBG5I2S74KHP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2WH6WA76IQFDLJTBG5I2S74KHP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2WH6WA76","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1805.02475&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2WH6WA76IQFDLJTBG5I2S74KHP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2WH6WA76IQFDLJTBG5I2S74KHP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2WH6WA76IQFDLJTBG5I2S74KHP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2WH6WA76IQFDLJTBG5I2S74KHP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2WH6WA76IQFDLJTBG5I2S74KHP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2WH6WA76IQFDLJTBG5I2S74KHP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2WH6WA76IQFDLJTBG5I2S74KHP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:16:39.804661+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:16:39.804661+00:00"}