{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LCVCTQORE2OZ","short_pith_number":"pith:2WUTJUKZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d5a934d1599272e07162a8a707449a764992605527386536cb69d258596fc8c2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2202.12891","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Combining Observational and Randomized Data for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Alicia Curth, Jeroen Berrevoets, Mihaela van der Schaar, Stefan Feuerriegel, Tobias Hatt","submitted_at":"2022-02-25T18:59:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects is an important problem across many domains. In order to accurately estimate such treatment effects, one typically relies on data from observational studies or randomized experiments. Currently, most existing works rely exclusively on observational data, which is often confounded and, hence, yields biased estimates. While observational data is confounded, randomized data is unconfounded, but its sample size is usually too small to learn heterogeneous treatment effects. In this paper, we propose to estimate heterogeneous treatment effects by combining "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2202.12891","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2022-02-25T18:59:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"49777361876b35e53123f5f4deb857d104e868d7c7976518550d7b787bad08d9","abstract_canon_sha256":"23ee3588c96a6da9c4576a3524df9eaed77e18a978a324cab5cce47b3dbdc745"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:00:09.381836Z","signature_b64":"x/OJdmIZIueRjah7oF+TJTuux6Yp/o1oDw9Bpl3nECxKCapHUiZNL7q0faAZ+aLpt3iFCNr9YlSLElCxNcYSDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d5a934d1599272e07162a8a707449a764992605527386536cb69d258596fc8c2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:00:09.381439Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:00:09.381439Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Combining Observational and Randomized Data for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Alicia Curth, Jeroen Berrevoets, Mihaela van der Schaar, Stefan Feuerriegel, Tobias Hatt","submitted_at":"2022-02-25T18:59:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects is an important problem across many domains. In order to accurately estimate such treatment effects, one typically relies on data from observational studies or randomized experiments. Currently, most existing works rely exclusively on observational data, which is often confounded and, hence, yields biased estimates. While observational data is confounded, randomized data is unconfounded, but its sample size is usually too small to learn heterogeneous treatment effects. In this paper, we propose to estimate heterogeneous treatment effects by combining "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2202.12891","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2202.12891/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2202.12891","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:00:09.381496+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2202.12891v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:00:09.381496+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2202.12891","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:00:09.381496+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2WUTJUKZSJZO","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:00:09.381496+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LC","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:00:09.381496+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2WUTJUKZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:00:09.381496+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.08981","citing_title":"Divide-and-shrink: An efficient and heterogeneity-agnostic approach for transfer estimation using summary statistics","ref_index":70,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00350","citing_title":"Robust Estimation and Inference with Selective Borrowing in Hybrid Controlled Trials: A Tutorial with SelectiveIntegrative and intFRT","ref_index":73,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.04134","citing_title":"Optimal Treatment Policy Estimation for Recurrent Events with a Competing Terminal Event: An Instrumented Difference-in-Differences Approach","ref_index":90,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.11136","citing_title":"Minimax Regret Estimation for Generalizing Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Multisite Data","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20710","citing_title":"Assessing Estimate of CATE from Observational Data via an RCT Study","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LCVCTQORE2OZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LCVCTQORE2OZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LCVCTQORE2OZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LCVCTQORE2OZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2WUTJUKZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LCVCTQORE2OZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LCVCTQORE2OZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2WUTJUKZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2202.12891&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LCVCTQORE2OZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LCVCTQORE2OZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LCVCTQORE2OZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LCVCTQORE2OZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LCVCTQORE2OZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LCVCTQORE2OZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2WUTJUKZSJZOA4LCVCTQORE2OZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:00:09.381496+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:00:09.381496+00:00"}