{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKOARAWLZULHA","short_pith_number":"pith:2XD7AD2D","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d5c7f00f43af164f0d4e044165e68b380302144e136f8c90ba9bcc3473f5877d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.12925","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"AgentLens: Revealing The Lucky Pass Problem in SWE-Agent Evaluation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Binary pass rates in SWE-agent tests equate chaotic trial-and-error successes with systematic ones.","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Benjamin Steenhoek, Gaurav Mittal, Pingping Lin, Priyam Sahoo, Shengjie Ma, Xiaomin Li, Yu Hu","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T03:00:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"Evaluation of software engineering (SWE) agents is dominated by a binary signal: whether the final patch passes the tests. This outcome-only view treats a principled solution and a chaotic trial-and-error process as equivalent. We show that this equivalence is empirically false. We evaluate 2,614 OpenHands trajectories from eight model backends on 60 SWE-bench Verified tasks. Of these, 47 have enough passing trajectories to construct task-level process references, yielding a 1,815-trajectory evaluation subset. Among passing trajectories in this subset, 10.7% exhibit behavior we call a Lucky Pa"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.12925","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T03:00:57Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"07872682c0cfb5124101ff197f31db38f83c886e616dae8057e2bc39abffda39","abstract_canon_sha256":"803d155a77ded41b300fe34dced984f3eb46a0af65c306e31432ddf0c8f2c16a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:10.101635Z","signature_b64":"t5jAyHzJ6WH8ts/9WL17z+PDjmmPs7j5Ynp59GedCrqQnODuZVxSDQiFYZxm5mtpRIo9y51ZUIcopL6M1bN9CA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d5c7f00f43af164f0d4e044165e68b380302144e136f8c90ba9bcc3473f5877d","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:10.100969Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:10.100969Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"AgentLens: Revealing The Lucky Pass Problem in SWE-Agent Evaluation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Binary pass rates in SWE-agent tests equate chaotic trial-and-error successes with systematic ones.","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Benjamin Steenhoek, Gaurav Mittal, Pingping Lin, Priyam Sahoo, Shengjie Ma, Xiaomin Li, Yu Hu","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T03:00:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"Evaluation of software engineering (SWE) agents is dominated by a binary signal: whether the final patch passes the tests. This outcome-only view treats a principled solution and a chaotic trial-and-error process as equivalent. We show that this equivalence is empirically false. We evaluate 2,614 OpenHands trajectories from eight model backends on 60 SWE-bench Verified tasks. Of these, 47 have enough passing trajectories to construct task-level process references, yielding a 1,815-trajectory evaluation subset. Among passing trajectories in this subset, 10.7% exhibit behavior we call a Lucky Pa"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Among passing trajectories in this subset, 10.7% exhibit behavior we call a Lucky Pass: regression cycles, blind retries, missing verification, or temporally disordered exploration, implementation, and verification.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That Prefix Tree Acceptor references built by merging multiple passing solutions accurately represent principled behavior without incorporating lucky elements from the source trajectories.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"10.7% of passing SWE-agent trajectories are Lucky Passes with chaotic behaviors, and a quality score based on process references changes model rankings across eight backends.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Binary pass rates in SWE-agent tests equate chaotic trial-and-error successes with systematic ones.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"adce0b450020fee18eaa30704ab28f998777265f989745261d06c17949418e61"},"source":{"id":"2605.12925","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"65a2b27d-f897-4cc8-8786-4ee98826b4a1","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-14T18:46:32.801828Z","strongest_claim":"Among passing trajectories in this subset, 10.7% exhibit behavior we call a Lucky Pass: regression cycles, blind retries, missing verification, or temporally disordered exploration, implementation, and verification.","one_line_summary":"10.7% of passing SWE-agent trajectories are Lucky Passes with chaotic behaviors, and a quality score based on process references changes model rankings across eight backends.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That Prefix Tree Acceptor references built by merging multiple passing solutions accurately represent principled behavior without incorporating lucky elements from the source trajectories.","pith_extraction_headline":"Binary pass rates in SWE-agent tests equate chaotic trial-and-error successes with systematic ones."},"references":{"count":61,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.20285 , year=","work_id":"e26e6ec9-37e3-47d8-b494-e0a227e77e36","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Swe-rebench: An automated pipeline for task collection and decontaminated evaluation of software engineering agents","work_id":"c819f5fe-32b6-41d1-aeb5-2d80c6fa8474","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Islem Bouzenia, Premkumar Devanbu, and Michael Pradel","work_id":"9584953a-2ac8-49b2-bcd3-44924077f86d","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2026,"title":"2026 , note =","work_id":"ad7bad76-b98f-4522-8476-a382ae24a4b8","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.5281/zenodo.19357078","year":null,"title":"doi:10.5281/zenodo.19357078 , url =","work_id":"5aab64ed-4762-4aa1-922b-18ae4b5b8b27","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":61,"snapshot_sha256":"66df3e8e7819f1fb70a7bba3a29167044596023591235646b3882339a9f38ab8","internal_anchors":14},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.12925","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:10.101073+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.12925v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:10.101073+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.12925","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:10.101073+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2XD7AD2DV4LE","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKO","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2XD7AD2D","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKOARAWLZULHA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKOARAWLZULHA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKOARAWLZULHA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKOARAWLZULHA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2XD7AD2D"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKOARAWLZULHA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKOARAWLZULHA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2XD7AD2D","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.12925&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKOARAWLZULHA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKOARAWLZULHA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKOARAWLZULHA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKOARAWLZULHA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKOARAWLZULHA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKOARAWLZULHA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2XD7AD2DV4LE6DKOARAWLZULHA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:10.101073+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:10.101073+00:00"}