{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UDPBDGJ233GO","short_pith_number":"pith:2XEV6KQD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d5c95f2a030a0f147a83784664eb7b338ae12b7d347f9eed5d161eedb0df4d89","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2602.11435","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Grounded Theory of Debugging in Professional Software Engineering Practice","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Haolin Li, Michael Coblenz","submitted_at":"2026-02-11T23:19:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Debugging is a central yet complex activity in software engineering. Prior studies have documented debugging strategies and tool usage, but little theory explains how experienced developers reason about bugs in large, real-world codebases. We conducted a qualitative study using a grounded theory approach. We observed seven professional developers and five professional live-coding streamers working on 17 debugging tasks in their own codebases, capturing diverse contexts of debugging. We theorize debugging as a structured, iterative diagnostic process in which programmers update a mental model o"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2602.11435","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2026-02-11T23:19:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"45abef6547ac36e924c141b2275f81a0a9619071822d4520d497333252a28e50","abstract_canon_sha256":"0ed4f89130f9a2f93a3c345cd05053c0fd26d92f97bef9de19a00b5669c4d5a9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:21.023469Z","signature_b64":"h7Pebg1V1YnD8IXsVXilU9lUfeNqflmQ1m8wanWh2i6zvyzPhn5uA5uc3n1jFqZZbxN+MannXO5QOWaRLPfVDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d5c95f2a030a0f147a83784664eb7b338ae12b7d347f9eed5d161eedb0df4d89","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:21.023037Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:21.023037Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Grounded Theory of Debugging in Professional Software Engineering Practice","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Haolin Li, Michael Coblenz","submitted_at":"2026-02-11T23:19:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Debugging is a central yet complex activity in software engineering. Prior studies have documented debugging strategies and tool usage, but little theory explains how experienced developers reason about bugs in large, real-world codebases. We conducted a qualitative study using a grounded theory approach. We observed seven professional developers and five professional live-coding streamers working on 17 debugging tasks in their own codebases, capturing diverse contexts of debugging. We theorize debugging as a structured, iterative diagnostic process in which programmers update a mental model o"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2602.11435","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2602.11435/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2602.11435","created_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:21.023093+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2602.11435v1","created_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:21.023093+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2602.11435","created_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:21.023093+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2XEV6KQDBIHR","created_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:21.023093+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UD","created_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:21.023093+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2XEV6KQD","created_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:21.023093+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18309","citing_title":"From Program Slices to Causal Clarity: Evaluating Faithful, Actionable LLM-Generated Failure Explanations via Context Partitioning and LLM-as-a-Judge","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18309","citing_title":"From Program Slices to Causal Clarity: Evaluating Faithful, Actionable LLM-Generated Failure Explanations via Context Partitioning and LLM-as-a-Judge","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UDPBDGJ233GO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UDPBDGJ233GO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UDPBDGJ233GO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UDPBDGJ233GO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2XEV6KQD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UDPBDGJ233GO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UDPBDGJ233GO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2XEV6KQD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2602.11435&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UDPBDGJ233GO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UDPBDGJ233GO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UDPBDGJ233GO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UDPBDGJ233GO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UDPBDGJ233GO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UDPBDGJ233GO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2XEV6KQDBIHRI6UDPBDGJ233GO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:21.023093+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:21.023093+00:00"}