{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:2YSPULLH2O2HNH6PPMF6BDFVJH","short_pith_number":"pith:2YSPULLH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d624fa2d67d3b4769fcf7b0be08cb549cc26aba249c5d29b3ba44a68be7f97b8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2407.16642","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Sharp bounds on aggregate expert error","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","math.ST","stat.ML","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.PR","authors_text":"Ariel Avital, Aryeh Kontorovich","submitted_at":"2024-07-23T16:57:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"We revisit the classic problem of aggregating binary advice from conditionally independent experts, also known as the Naive Bayes setting. Our quantity of interest is the error probability of the optimal decision rule. In the case of symmetric errors (sensitivity = specificity), reasonably tight bounds on the optimal error probability are known. In the general asymmetric case, we are not aware of any nontrivial estimates on this quantity. Our contribution consists of sharp upper and lower bounds on the optimal error probability in the general case, which recover and sharpen the best known resu"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2407.16642","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.PR","submitted_at":"2024-07-23T16:57:10Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","math.ST","stat.ML","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"439521b109bf9f8d3522c3da5f5181b3b86a253f750d5b039dccbd5dfc3b1d6a","abstract_canon_sha256":"cf3918b139376f64d291d5efd0c711a3f7eddace7b29de2901c11db6ba81c746"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:03.078610Z","signature_b64":"+yL5+OI8iqfLdXxWpEhTuZCOL/Pfx7j0raHUV0KVS/+fr30TSsMd5XgyuCiZkbVtSFlQnxGXdoLgucnPOniZAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d624fa2d67d3b4769fcf7b0be08cb549cc26aba249c5d29b3ba44a68be7f97b8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:03.078203Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:03.078203Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Sharp bounds on aggregate expert error","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","math.ST","stat.ML","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.PR","authors_text":"Ariel Avital, Aryeh Kontorovich","submitted_at":"2024-07-23T16:57:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"We revisit the classic problem of aggregating binary advice from conditionally independent experts, also known as the Naive Bayes setting. Our quantity of interest is the error probability of the optimal decision rule. In the case of symmetric errors (sensitivity = specificity), reasonably tight bounds on the optimal error probability are known. In the general asymmetric case, we are not aware of any nontrivial estimates on this quantity. Our contribution consists of sharp upper and lower bounds on the optimal error probability in the general case, which recover and sharpen the best known resu"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2407.16642","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2407.16642/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2407.16642","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:03.078254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2407.16642v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:03.078254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.16642","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:03.078254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2YSPULLH2O2H","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:03.078254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2YSPULLH2O2HNH6P","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:03.078254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2YSPULLH","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:03.078254+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.05437","citing_title":"Approximating the total variation distance between spin systems","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2YSPULLH2O2HNH6PPMF6BDFVJH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2YSPULLH2O2HNH6PPMF6BDFVJH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2YSPULLH2O2HNH6PPMF6BDFVJH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2YSPULLH2O2HNH6PPMF6BDFVJH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2YSPULLH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2YSPULLH2O2HNH6PPMF6BDFVJH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2YSPULLH2O2HNH6PPMF6BDFVJH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2YSPULLH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2407.16642&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2YSPULLH2O2HNH6PPMF6BDFVJH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2YSPULLH2O2HNH6PPMF6BDFVJH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2YSPULLH2O2HNH6PPMF6BDFVJH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2YSPULLH2O2HNH6PPMF6BDFVJH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2YSPULLH2O2HNH6PPMF6BDFVJH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2YSPULLH2O2HNH6PPMF6BDFVJH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2YSPULLH2O2HNH6PPMF6BDFVJH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:03.078254+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:03.078254+00:00"}