{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXSJDZBRTXEPU","short_pith_number":"pith:2YWT5KNY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d62d3ea9b81813e286f248f218cee47d0bbcab64ed1164d5ac3cebe2c7fa135a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.23840","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Do Thinking Tokens Help or Trap? Towards More Efficient Large Reasoning Model","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bowen Ding, Futing Wang, Lingfeng Ming, Tao Lin, Yuhan Chen","submitted_at":"2025-06-30T13:30:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel at solving complex problems but face an overthinking dilemma. When handling simple tasks, they often produce verbose responses overloaded with thinking tokens (e.g., wait, however). These tokens trigger unnecessary high-level reasoning behaviors like reflection and backtracking, reducing efficiency. In this work, our pilot study reveals that these thinking-token-induced behaviors are not essential for effective problem-solving and may even hinder correct reasoning within constrained token budgets. We identify this phenomenon as the thinking trap. To mitigate"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.23840","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-06-30T13:30:33Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"b8c7a2ad6d0de899750da02a6d9c3f51bee239d386748d2f3c9bb293878bfa18","abstract_canon_sha256":"8d3e5d4c3b1b8df49e0d752625f324ae29161c7949f95c7ad71b4b03fefc5e3f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:29:28.694278Z","signature_b64":"zI77enhI6Y5SsYgVQafdT/xzQDJMF5cGwIZN47M79mAYPy1tuHamOY5ECwgLkFUgAtyqX+0k56XVgSjfawWCBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d62d3ea9b81813e286f248f218cee47d0bbcab64ed1164d5ac3cebe2c7fa135a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:29:28.693746Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:29:28.693746Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Do Thinking Tokens Help or Trap? Towards More Efficient Large Reasoning Model","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bowen Ding, Futing Wang, Lingfeng Ming, Tao Lin, Yuhan Chen","submitted_at":"2025-06-30T13:30:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel at solving complex problems but face an overthinking dilemma. When handling simple tasks, they often produce verbose responses overloaded with thinking tokens (e.g., wait, however). These tokens trigger unnecessary high-level reasoning behaviors like reflection and backtracking, reducing efficiency. In this work, our pilot study reveals that these thinking-token-induced behaviors are not essential for effective problem-solving and may even hinder correct reasoning within constrained token budgets. We identify this phenomenon as the thinking trap. To mitigate"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.23840","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.23840/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.23840","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:29:28.693812+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.23840v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:29:28.693812+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.23840","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:29:28.693812+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2YWT5KNYDAJ6","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:29:28.693812+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXS","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:29:28.693812+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2YWT5KNY","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:29:28.693812+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.23181","citing_title":"DART: Draft-Agreement Routing for Training-Free Adaptive Thinking Budgets in Hybrid Reasoning Models","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.12529","citing_title":"TERMINATOR: Learning Optimal Exit Points for Early Stopping in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.09567","citing_title":"Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models","ref_index":156,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXSJDZBRTXEPU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXSJDZBRTXEPU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXSJDZBRTXEPU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXSJDZBRTXEPU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2YWT5KNY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXSJDZBRTXEPU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXSJDZBRTXEPU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2YWT5KNY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.23840&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXSJDZBRTXEPU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXSJDZBRTXEPU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXSJDZBRTXEPU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXSJDZBRTXEPU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXSJDZBRTXEPU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXSJDZBRTXEPU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2YWT5KNYDAJ6FBXSJDZBRTXEPU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:29:28.693812+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:29:28.693812+00:00"}