{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAKTGP4U6IAA3","short_pith_number":"pith:2ZFCROU6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d64a28ba9e5f083b540a999fca790006ef116b7c93ead081f4d115815e172610","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.08449","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Calibrating the Tully-Fisher Relation to Measure the Hubble Constant","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Adam G. Riess, Daniel Scolnic, Gagandeep S. Anand, Jakob Byrne, Paula Boubel","submitted_at":"2024-12-11T15:12:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Boubel et al. 2024 (B24) recently used the Tully-Fisher (TF) relation to measure calibrated distances in the Hubble flow and found $H_0= 73.3 \\pm 2.1 (stat) \\pm 3.5 (sys)$ km/s/Mpc. The large systematic uncertainty was the result of propagating the conflict between two sources of empirical distance calibration: a difference in zeropoint when calibrating the TF relation with Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) versus Cepheids and Tip-of-the-Red-Giant-Branch (TRGB) and an apparent difference in zeropoint between two distinct TRGB datasets. We trace the SN Ia-based calibration used in the TF analysis to "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.08449","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2024-12-11T15:12:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"f34571d8e19ce2060df565713ec23034123e3bdbba1dfe544c41b1b61f6594cc","abstract_canon_sha256":"1ffbe134a701801d50d69085968e3256f71326069a0030b72e15327d111588c8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:47:50.420365Z","signature_b64":"rJ97wegZCN8Z/Pk7Q2ftr7f43B+sbaoOkYBRe7141DpZ2iCSsXWrHU2BLFbw1UHLAUX8J87LmEP3m5EBsKsbCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d64a28ba9e5f083b540a999fca790006ef116b7c93ead081f4d115815e172610","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:47:50.419897Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:47:50.419897Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Calibrating the Tully-Fisher Relation to Measure the Hubble Constant","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Adam G. Riess, Daniel Scolnic, Gagandeep S. Anand, Jakob Byrne, Paula Boubel","submitted_at":"2024-12-11T15:12:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Boubel et al. 2024 (B24) recently used the Tully-Fisher (TF) relation to measure calibrated distances in the Hubble flow and found $H_0= 73.3 \\pm 2.1 (stat) \\pm 3.5 (sys)$ km/s/Mpc. The large systematic uncertainty was the result of propagating the conflict between two sources of empirical distance calibration: a difference in zeropoint when calibrating the TF relation with Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) versus Cepheids and Tip-of-the-Red-Giant-Branch (TRGB) and an apparent difference in zeropoint between two distinct TRGB datasets. We trace the SN Ia-based calibration used in the TF analysis to "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2412.08449","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.08449/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.08449","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:47:50.419952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.08449v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:47:50.419952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.08449","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:47:50.419952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2ZFCROU6L4ED","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:47:50.419952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAK","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:47:50.419952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2ZFCROU6","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:47:50.419952+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.26831","citing_title":"Distance-Ladder Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Recent Progress, Systematics, and Prospects","ref_index":99,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.22575","citing_title":"On the Tully-Fisher Relation for Active Galaxies -- I: Evidence of Larger Scatter","ref_index":122,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.20434","citing_title":"The Hubble tension: A decade review","ref_index":168,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01226","citing_title":"Intertwined Constraints in Extended Cosmologies: Dark Energy, Curvature, Neutrinos, and Inflation","ref_index":85,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.31324","citing_title":"Cosmological Viability of Exponential Infrared $f(T)$ Gravity","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.18741","citing_title":"Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum from relativistic $N$-body Simulations: $\\Lambda_{\\rm s}$CDM versus $\\Lambda$CDM","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAKTGP4U6IAA3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAKTGP4U6IAA3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAKTGP4U6IAA3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAKTGP4U6IAA3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2ZFCROU6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAKTGP4U6IAA3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAKTGP4U6IAA3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2ZFCROU6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2412.08449&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAKTGP4U6IAA3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAKTGP4U6IAA3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAKTGP4U6IAA3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAKTGP4U6IAA3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAKTGP4U6IAA3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAKTGP4U6IAA3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2ZFCROU6L4EDWVAKTGP4U6IAA3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:47:50.419952+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:47:50.419952+00:00"}