{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2008:335ZGDOJFXUAOEOOOOQN3G6HJL","short_pith_number":"pith:335ZGDOJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"defb930dc92de80711ce73a0dd9bc74afe8ea6b76b6044c866aca75c04cc735b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"0806.2117","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Is Confinement a Phase of Broken Dual Gauge Symmetry?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-lat","authors_text":"B. Lucini, J. Greensite","submitted_at":"2008-06-12T17:04:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study whether broken dual gauge symmetry, as detected by a monopole order parameter introduced by the Pisa group, is necessarily associated with the confinement phase of a lattice gauge theory. We find a number of examples, including SU(2) gauge-Higgs theory, mixed fundamental-adjoint SU(2) gauge theory, and pure SU(5) gauge theory, which appear to indicate a dual gauge symmetry transition in the absence of a transition to or from a confined phase. While these results are not necessarily fatal to the dual superconductor hypothesis, they may pose some problems of interpretation for the prese"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"0806.2117","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-lat","submitted_at":"2008-06-12T17:04:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"ece4e99ffedf25f1c0ec6072f849d7c1e70a6f565bf0739e92c37fec839d20e3","abstract_canon_sha256":"6aff12be5a65b0eb7f4fba1aac2fc84e8b22e7b3261583bae5dbb67c3bcc2e3d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T17:28:28.058501Z","signature_b64":"tTmJVXBjUqJ1Xo134kSTsz0H2a/KnV5XIPKynmwmViUPsGdtntyqco6aGLDgKKAenbgXw1QyvmbOWgZrudjaAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"defb930dc92de80711ce73a0dd9bc74afe8ea6b76b6044c866aca75c04cc735b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T17:28:28.058069Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T17:28:28.058069Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Is Confinement a Phase of Broken Dual Gauge Symmetry?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-lat","authors_text":"B. Lucini, J. Greensite","submitted_at":"2008-06-12T17:04:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study whether broken dual gauge symmetry, as detected by a monopole order parameter introduced by the Pisa group, is necessarily associated with the confinement phase of a lattice gauge theory. We find a number of examples, including SU(2) gauge-Higgs theory, mixed fundamental-adjoint SU(2) gauge theory, and pure SU(5) gauge theory, which appear to indicate a dual gauge symmetry transition in the absence of a transition to or from a confined phase. While these results are not necessarily fatal to the dual superconductor hypothesis, they may pose some problems of interpretation for the prese"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"0806.2117","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/0806.2117/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"0806.2117","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:28:28.058132+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"0806.2117v1","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:28:28.058132+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.0806.2117","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:28:28.058132+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"335ZGDOJFXUA","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:28:28.058132+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"335ZGDOJFXUAOEOO","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:28:28.058132+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"335ZGDOJ","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:28:28.058132+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.19320","citing_title":"Topological Data Analysis of Abelian Magnetic Monopoles in Gauge Theories","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/335ZGDOJFXUAOEOOOOQN3G6HJL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/335ZGDOJFXUAOEOOOOQN3G6HJL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/335ZGDOJFXUAOEOOOOQN3G6HJL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/335ZGDOJFXUAOEOOOOQN3G6HJL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/335ZGDOJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/335ZGDOJFXUAOEOOOOQN3G6HJL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/335ZGDOJFXUAOEOOOOQN3G6HJL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/335ZGDOJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=0806.2117&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/335ZGDOJFXUAOEOOOOQN3G6HJL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/335ZGDOJFXUAOEOOOOQN3G6HJL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/335ZGDOJFXUAOEOOOOQN3G6HJL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/335ZGDOJFXUAOEOOOOQN3G6HJL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/335ZGDOJFXUAOEOOOOQN3G6HJL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/335ZGDOJFXUAOEOOOOQN3G6HJL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/335ZGDOJFXUAOEOOOOQN3G6HJL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T17:28:28.058132+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T17:28:28.058132+00:00"}