{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZQWR4XJXPPC","short_pith_number":"pith:33EY2SZ2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"dec98d4b3a2b4d35e27985a3cba6ef78ba6e1b3d172b1aa5fd43551fb189f3cf","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2006.14768","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Deep Partition Aggregation: Provable Defense against General Poisoning Attacks","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Alexander Levine, Soheil Feizi","submitted_at":"2020-06-26T03:16:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"Adversarial poisoning attacks distort training data in order to corrupt the test-time behavior of a classifier. A provable defense provides a certificate for each test sample, which is a lower bound on the magnitude of any adversarial distortion of the training set that can corrupt the test sample's classification. We propose two novel provable defenses against poisoning attacks: (i) Deep Partition Aggregation (DPA), a certified defense against a general poisoning threat model, defined as the insertion or deletion of a bounded number of samples to the training set -- by implication, this threa"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2006.14768","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2020-06-26T03:16:31Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"b51ac3ff0fffeac7122d1e7a059c445966e0473c3dcf7ca901c92799687b896a","abstract_canon_sha256":"4ad4400d65700f10483f7e6a1b4803df8c66794ac2fccb97ca63366a2704dd68"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:24:10.131618Z","signature_b64":"JFZgVxFH3cSBEBbeV0gzCHdH4dILWS2j4MSO0L284IqWnzqOb5Nf/fBLwodq4jtYoloEZsrs/aGCM/lhCXF/AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"dec98d4b3a2b4d35e27985a3cba6ef78ba6e1b3d172b1aa5fd43551fb189f3cf","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:24:10.131178Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:24:10.131178Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Deep Partition Aggregation: Provable Defense against General Poisoning Attacks","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Alexander Levine, Soheil Feizi","submitted_at":"2020-06-26T03:16:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"Adversarial poisoning attacks distort training data in order to corrupt the test-time behavior of a classifier. A provable defense provides a certificate for each test sample, which is a lower bound on the magnitude of any adversarial distortion of the training set that can corrupt the test sample's classification. We propose two novel provable defenses against poisoning attacks: (i) Deep Partition Aggregation (DPA), a certified defense against a general poisoning threat model, defined as the insertion or deletion of a bounded number of samples to the training set -- by implication, this threa"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2006.14768","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2006.14768/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2006.14768","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:24:10.131229+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2006.14768v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:24:10.131229+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2006.14768","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:24:10.131229+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"33EY2SZ2FNGT","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:24:10.131229+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:24:10.131229+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"33EY2SZ2","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:24:10.131229+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21146","citing_title":"Detecting Trojaned DNNs via Spectral Regression Analysis","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZQWR4XJXPPC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZQWR4XJXPPC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZQWR4XJXPPC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZQWR4XJXPPC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/33EY2SZ2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZQWR4XJXPPC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZQWR4XJXPPC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/33EY2SZ2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2006.14768&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZQWR4XJXPPC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZQWR4XJXPPC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZQWR4XJXPPC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZQWR4XJXPPC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZQWR4XJXPPC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZQWR4XJXPPC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/33EY2SZ2FNGTLYTZQWR4XJXPPC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:24:10.131229+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:24:10.131229+00:00"}