{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:34OBIXTV5EKF54GQPPCE3S3HOJ","short_pith_number":"pith:34OBIXTV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"df1c145e75e9145ef0d07bc44dcb67724c7f0f5716309df657fb8a0beb1b1e64","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.01289","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Measuring the Exploitation of Weaknesses in the Wild","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Carlos Galhardo, Irena Bojanova, Peter Mell","submitted_at":"2024-05-02T13:49:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Identifying the software weaknesses exploited by attacks supports efforts to reduce developer introduction of vulnerabilities and to guide security code review efforts. A weakness is a bug or fault type that can be exploited through an operation that results in a security-relevant error. Ideally, the security community would measure the prevalence of the software weaknesses used in actual exploitation. This work advances that goal by introducing a simple metric that utilizes public data feeds to determine the probability of a weakness being exploited in the wild for any 30-day window. The metr"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.01289","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2024-05-02T13:49:51Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"7cdbcc49e4de8ff1b958b5c776925bb5c8749f664f7edc9de5da3c1d45461035","abstract_canon_sha256":"01e74e2fa90459f854c9b837c4c29ee5233678b0f800ab746b35e2d5cd9e0ce9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:14:43.401386Z","signature_b64":"voUMyoFgrQ+DYwr0pBLIVvjgJeK5hub14Lw2lf89Yqs7ps2kkygPSpOPwjfZreJD7Tv5eO6rr1CPuUu+MH9RAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"df1c145e75e9145ef0d07bc44dcb67724c7f0f5716309df657fb8a0beb1b1e64","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:14:43.400948Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:14:43.400948Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Measuring the Exploitation of Weaknesses in the Wild","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Carlos Galhardo, Irena Bojanova, Peter Mell","submitted_at":"2024-05-02T13:49:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Identifying the software weaknesses exploited by attacks supports efforts to reduce developer introduction of vulnerabilities and to guide security code review efforts. A weakness is a bug or fault type that can be exploited through an operation that results in a security-relevant error. Ideally, the security community would measure the prevalence of the software weaknesses used in actual exploitation. This work advances that goal by introducing a simple metric that utilizes public data feeds to determine the probability of a weakness being exploited in the wild for any 30-day window. The metr"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.01289","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.01289/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.01289","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:14:43.401017+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.01289v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:14:43.401017+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.01289","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:14:43.401017+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"34OBIXTV5EKF","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:14:43.401017+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"34OBIXTV5EKF54GQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:14:43.401017+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"34OBIXTV","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:14:43.401017+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.00692","citing_title":"Vul4Py: Benchmarking Automated Vulnerability Repair in Python with Paired Exploit and Functional Oracles","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/34OBIXTV5EKF54GQPPCE3S3HOJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/34OBIXTV5EKF54GQPPCE3S3HOJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/34OBIXTV5EKF54GQPPCE3S3HOJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/34OBIXTV5EKF54GQPPCE3S3HOJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/34OBIXTV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/34OBIXTV5EKF54GQPPCE3S3HOJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/34OBIXTV5EKF54GQPPCE3S3HOJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/34OBIXTV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.01289&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/34OBIXTV5EKF54GQPPCE3S3HOJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/34OBIXTV5EKF54GQPPCE3S3HOJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/34OBIXTV5EKF54GQPPCE3S3HOJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/34OBIXTV5EKF54GQPPCE3S3HOJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/34OBIXTV5EKF54GQPPCE3S3HOJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/34OBIXTV5EKF54GQPPCE3S3HOJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/34OBIXTV5EKF54GQPPCE3S3HOJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:14:43.401017+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:14:43.401017+00:00"}