{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:3BKESSXJNJTLHJWPD7UPEOWWMQ","short_pith_number":"pith:3BKESSXJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d854494ae96a66b3a6cf1fe8f23ad664187fc71acbe7a0d64358d8ad68ae65b2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1707.09549","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Sensitivity Analysis for matched pair analysis of binary data: From worst case to average case analysis","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Dylan S. Small, Raiden B. Hasegawa","submitted_at":"2017-07-29T18:49:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"In matched observational studies where treatment assignment is not randomized, sensitivity analysis helps investigators determine how sensitive their estimated treatment effect is to some unmeasured con- founder. The standard approach calibrates the sensitivity analysis according to the worst case bias in a pair. This approach will result in a conservative sensitivity analysis if the worst case bias does not hold in every pair. In this paper, we show that for binary data, the standard approach can be calibrated in terms of the average bias in a pair rather than worst case bias. When the worst "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1707.09549","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2017-07-29T18:49:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"1efa7c4e8065c6cb266af642672831e3fbb066f6621ebdb8753cba4456794a55","abstract_canon_sha256":"2a5e3b1db6813d676cf555252f07607a75a3e532028a7935436b90d155ad83f7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:49.250209Z","signature_b64":"Ij0LutEdCpTeoSAmV80gCs0jfHi8w9u44fxx2Rs8ywfSU1g+4v2iEWnISxsGpmDIj+FHHQbUrufEqRYWLAf6AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d854494ae96a66b3a6cf1fe8f23ad664187fc71acbe7a0d64358d8ad68ae65b2","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:49.249736Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:49.249736Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Sensitivity Analysis for matched pair analysis of binary data: From worst case to average case analysis","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Dylan S. Small, Raiden B. Hasegawa","submitted_at":"2017-07-29T18:49:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"In matched observational studies where treatment assignment is not randomized, sensitivity analysis helps investigators determine how sensitive their estimated treatment effect is to some unmeasured con- founder. The standard approach calibrates the sensitivity analysis according to the worst case bias in a pair. This approach will result in a conservative sensitivity analysis if the worst case bias does not hold in every pair. In this paper, we show that for binary data, the standard approach can be calibrated in terms of the average bias in a pair rather than worst case bias. When the worst "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1707.09549","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1707.09549","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:49.249803+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1707.09549v2","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:49.249803+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1707.09549","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:49.249803+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3BKESSXJNJTL","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:58.224056+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3BKESSXJNJTLHJWP","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:58.224056+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3BKESSXJ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:58.224056+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3BKESSXJNJTLHJWPD7UPEOWWMQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3BKESSXJNJTLHJWPD7UPEOWWMQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3BKESSXJNJTLHJWPD7UPEOWWMQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3BKESSXJNJTLHJWPD7UPEOWWMQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3BKESSXJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3BKESSXJNJTLHJWPD7UPEOWWMQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3BKESSXJNJTLHJWPD7UPEOWWMQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3BKESSXJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1707.09549&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3BKESSXJNJTLHJWPD7UPEOWWMQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3BKESSXJNJTLHJWPD7UPEOWWMQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3BKESSXJNJTLHJWPD7UPEOWWMQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3BKESSXJNJTLHJWPD7UPEOWWMQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3BKESSXJNJTLHJWPD7UPEOWWMQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3BKESSXJNJTLHJWPD7UPEOWWMQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3BKESSXJNJTLHJWPD7UPEOWWMQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:49.249803+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:49.249803+00:00"}