{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:1994:3CXS77MNZQCDOAIUIFLRUMZGKN","short_pith_number":"pith:3CXS77MN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d8af2ffd8dcc0437011441571a3326536e6ce6061ed2bbd4c0bac9c76c7a6ef8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"hep-ph/9409309","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"QCD Factors a1 and a2 Beyond Leading Logarithms Versus Factorization in Non-Leptonic Heavy Meson Decays","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A.J. Buras","submitted_at":"1994-09-14T13:04:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"We calculate the QCD factors $a_1$ and $a_2$, entering the tests of factorization in non-leptonic heavy meson decays, beyond the leading logarithmic approximation in three renormalization schemes (NDR, HV, DRED). We investigate their $\\mu$--dependence and the renormalization scheme dependence. We point out that $a_1$ for B-decays depends very weakly on $\\Lms$, $\\mu$ and the choice of the renormalization scheme. For $\\Lms^{(5)}=225\\pm85~MeV$ and $4~GeV\\leq\\mu\\leq 8~GeV$ we find $a_1=1.01\\pm0.02$ in accordance with phenomenology. The $\\Lms$, $\\mu$ and scheme dependences of $a_2$ are on the other"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"hep-ph/9409309","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"1994-09-14T13:04:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"9d14c8675a61c0faf9ce2ebdc88220ebd0bdc5ec8d0d82d65b8318fbda6ff70e","abstract_canon_sha256":"dc9b7fb3c5e94598d9fe177733573d95dffef16cbec460c48b8aaf50d2032723"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:35.389802Z","signature_b64":"+kB+C+YBQrxn150fA39H2fgcM2uJVW8koixebny8F3CQAki3ApJ+3GGgCGRL95iaRw7NvasO9FDNNxOcUwUsAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d8af2ffd8dcc0437011441571a3326536e6ce6061ed2bbd4c0bac9c76c7a6ef8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:35.389436Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:35.389436Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"QCD Factors a1 and a2 Beyond Leading Logarithms Versus Factorization in Non-Leptonic Heavy Meson Decays","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A.J. Buras","submitted_at":"1994-09-14T13:04:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"We calculate the QCD factors $a_1$ and $a_2$, entering the tests of factorization in non-leptonic heavy meson decays, beyond the leading logarithmic approximation in three renormalization schemes (NDR, HV, DRED). We investigate their $\\mu$--dependence and the renormalization scheme dependence. We point out that $a_1$ for B-decays depends very weakly on $\\Lms$, $\\mu$ and the choice of the renormalization scheme. For $\\Lms^{(5)}=225\\pm85~MeV$ and $4~GeV\\leq\\mu\\leq 8~GeV$ we find $a_1=1.01\\pm0.02$ in accordance with phenomenology. The $\\Lms$, $\\mu$ and scheme dependences of $a_2$ are on the other"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"hep-ph/9409309","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/hep-ph/9409309/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"hep-ph/9409309","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:35.389501+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"hep-ph/9409309v1","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:35.389501+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.hep-ph/9409309","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:35.389501+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3CXS77MNZQCD","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:35.389501+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3CXS77MNZQCDOAIU","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:35.389501+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3CXS77MN","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:35.389501+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2411.11413","citing_title":"Unravelling theoretical challenges in understanding $B_c$ meson decay","ref_index":67,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3CXS77MNZQCDOAIUIFLRUMZGKN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3CXS77MNZQCDOAIUIFLRUMZGKN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3CXS77MNZQCDOAIUIFLRUMZGKN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3CXS77MNZQCDOAIUIFLRUMZGKN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3CXS77MN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3CXS77MNZQCDOAIUIFLRUMZGKN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3CXS77MNZQCDOAIUIFLRUMZGKN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3CXS77MN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=hep-ph/9409309&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3CXS77MNZQCDOAIUIFLRUMZGKN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3CXS77MNZQCDOAIUIFLRUMZGKN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3CXS77MNZQCDOAIUIFLRUMZGKN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3CXS77MNZQCDOAIUIFLRUMZGKN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3CXS77MNZQCDOAIUIFLRUMZGKN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3CXS77MNZQCDOAIUIFLRUMZGKN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3CXS77MNZQCDOAIUIFLRUMZGKN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:35.389501+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:35.389501+00:00"}