{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6EMRZGNSGJP2","short_pith_number":"pith:3E4QNBUH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d9390686874cdec50bc4647266c8c97e95829f573624cc449d54477692fbdd49","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2407.19825","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Concise Thoughts: Impact of Output Length on LLM Reasoning and Cost","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andrea Saracino, Fabrizio Giacomelli, Giorgio Buttazzo, Giulio Rossolini, Marco Simoni, Nicolamaria Manes, Sania Nayab","submitted_at":"2024-07-29T09:21:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"Today's large language models (LLMs) can solve challenging question-answering tasks, and prompt engineering techniques, such as chain-of-thought (CoT), have gained attention for enhancing the explanation and correctness of outputs. However, many models and techniques tend to produce excessively verbose and lengthy answers, leading to issues with both conciseness and generation time. To address this, this paper analyzes the impact of output lengths on LLM inference pipelines by introducing and proposing novel metrics to evaluate the \\textit{correct conciseness} of a model and related prompting "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2407.19825","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-07-29T09:21:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"908591bcb8e44ca0e45a040c1de0270cc5d460beb086543adb555c32c87ac341","abstract_canon_sha256":"2de376c12e3a82a89c63168fe3bb8b6de5cc859f76df61636ff1c6dce09ab112"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:15.122354Z","signature_b64":"aAgTaICzuIBz0gIdXaLyujt1eTWNsd1go1ZU0wL5njRMDC8T+o6OTrvg8LS8DcnMi84njLc8x7otryIEJ4poCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d9390686874cdec50bc4647266c8c97e95829f573624cc449d54477692fbdd49","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:15.121929Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:15.121929Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Concise Thoughts: Impact of Output Length on LLM Reasoning and Cost","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andrea Saracino, Fabrizio Giacomelli, Giorgio Buttazzo, Giulio Rossolini, Marco Simoni, Nicolamaria Manes, Sania Nayab","submitted_at":"2024-07-29T09:21:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"Today's large language models (LLMs) can solve challenging question-answering tasks, and prompt engineering techniques, such as chain-of-thought (CoT), have gained attention for enhancing the explanation and correctness of outputs. However, many models and techniques tend to produce excessively verbose and lengthy answers, leading to issues with both conciseness and generation time. To address this, this paper analyzes the impact of output lengths on LLM inference pipelines by introducing and proposing novel metrics to evaluate the \\textit{correct conciseness} of a model and related prompting "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2407.19825","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2407.19825/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2407.19825","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:15.121985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2407.19825v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:15.121985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.19825","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:15.121985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3E4QNBUHJTPM","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:15.121985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6E","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:15.121985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3E4QNBUH","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:15.121985+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":10,"internal_anchor_count":10,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01511","citing_title":"Revisiting Chain-of-Thought Reasoning under Limited Supervision: Semi-supervised Chain-of-Thought Learning","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07108","citing_title":"DyCon: Dynamic Reasoning Control via Evolving Difficulty Modeling","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00862","citing_title":"CAT: Confidence-Adaptive Thinking for Efficient Reasoning of Large Reasoning Models","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.29354","citing_title":"When LLMs Develop Languages: Symbolic Communication for Efficient Multi-Agent Reasoning","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.22211","citing_title":"CLORE: Content-Level Optimization for Reasoning Efficiency","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.17672","citing_title":"Stop When Reasoning Converges: Semantic-Preserving Early Exit for Reasoning Models","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20149","citing_title":"Less Back-and-Forth: A Comparative Study of Structured Prompting","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.16068","citing_title":"Resource Consumption Threats in Large Language Models","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.03679","citing_title":"LightThinker++: From Reasoning Compression to Memory Management","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01111","citing_title":"When Less is Enough: Efficient Inference via Collaborative Reasoning","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6EMRZGNSGJP2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6EMRZGNSGJP2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6EMRZGNSGJP2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6EMRZGNSGJP2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3E4QNBUH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6EMRZGNSGJP2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6EMRZGNSGJP2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3E4QNBUH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2407.19825&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6EMRZGNSGJP2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6EMRZGNSGJP2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6EMRZGNSGJP2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6EMRZGNSGJP2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6EMRZGNSGJP2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6EMRZGNSGJP2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3E4QNBUHJTPMKC6EMRZGNSGJP2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:15.121985+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:15.121985+00:00"}