{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2011:3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB5SPQWVON4Z","short_pith_number":"pith:3EUBIPCC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d928143c42dd4b6d85c1ec9f0b55cde64e0a3c7a8f0fc239b9dbd8db96bca630","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1111.2048","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Milky Way's bright satellites as an apparent failure of LCDM","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"James S. Bullock, Manoj Kaplinghat, Michael Boylan-Kolchin","submitted_at":"2011-11-08T21:00:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"We use the Aquarius simulations to show that the most massive subhalos in galaxy-mass dark matter halos in LCDM are grossly inconsistent with the dynamics of the brightest Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies. While the best-fitting hosts of the dwarf spheroidals all have 12 < Vmax < 25 km/s, LCDM simulations predict at least ten subhalos with Vmax > 25 km/s. These subhalos are also among the most massive at earlier times, and significantly exceed the UV suppression mass back to z ~ 10. No LCDM-based model of the satellite population of the Milky Way explains this result. The problem lies in th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1111.2048","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2011-11-08T21:00:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"1b5c19cd32ac7cc83b11f9a9072cfe4ac4a9d9528638d8e5db6bd4dcbcb006ae","abstract_canon_sha256":"0ee60a9b31eb7355402afeb9a93a94363cd220d0bc783817a2d7b99cbbdc8951"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:12.706417Z","signature_b64":"a2yq/noMmBAo2oeUDvSzJfLV8QRlkXWi744Co7mHUxr5If7Av0hj12K095WnVqTJ0QVLgkrDhbS7lhcrS7xECQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d928143c42dd4b6d85c1ec9f0b55cde64e0a3c7a8f0fc239b9dbd8db96bca630","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:12.705987Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:12.705987Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Milky Way's bright satellites as an apparent failure of LCDM","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"James S. Bullock, Manoj Kaplinghat, Michael Boylan-Kolchin","submitted_at":"2011-11-08T21:00:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"We use the Aquarius simulations to show that the most massive subhalos in galaxy-mass dark matter halos in LCDM are grossly inconsistent with the dynamics of the brightest Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies. While the best-fitting hosts of the dwarf spheroidals all have 12 < Vmax < 25 km/s, LCDM simulations predict at least ten subhalos with Vmax > 25 km/s. These subhalos are also among the most massive at earlier times, and significantly exceed the UV suppression mass back to z ~ 10. No LCDM-based model of the satellite population of the Milky Way explains this result. The problem lies in th"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1111.2048","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1111.2048","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:12.706047+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1111.2048v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:12.706047+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1111.2048","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:12.706047+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3EUBIPCC3VFW","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:18.847500+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:18.847500+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3EUBIPCC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:18.847500+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.17064","citing_title":"Imprints of energy injection by compact dark stars in the 21-cm signal","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB5SPQWVON4Z","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB5SPQWVON4Z.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB5SPQWVON4Z/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB5SPQWVON4Z/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3EUBIPCC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB5SPQWVON4Z","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB5SPQWVON4Z.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3EUBIPCC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1111.2048&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB5SPQWVON4Z/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB5SPQWVON4Z/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB5SPQWVON4Z/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB5SPQWVON4Z/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB5SPQWVON4Z/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB5SPQWVON4Z/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3EUBIPCC3VFW3BOB5SPQWVON4Z/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:12.706047+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:12.706047+00:00"}