{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VMBOPPSLFQZD","short_pith_number":"pith:3EWMDV3S","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d92cc1d7721edcea6eac0b9ef92cb0c8fa8242567c620bb390d9b5758faf359c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.07106","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Theorem-of-Thought: A Multi-Agent Framework for Abductive, Deductive, and Inductive Reasoning in Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Erchin Serpedin, Hasan Kurban, Khalid Qaraqe, Samir Abdaljalil","submitted_at":"2025-06-08T12:28:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance across natural language reasoning tasks, yet their reasoning processes remain brittle and difficult to interpret. Prompting techniques like Chain-of-Thought (CoT) enhance reliability by eliciting intermediate reasoning steps or aggregating multiple outputs. However, they lack mechanisms for enforcing logical structure and assessing internal coherence. We introduce Theorem-of-Thought (ToTh), a novel framework that models reasoning as collaboration among three parallel agents, each simulating a distinct mode of inference: abductive, dedu"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.07106","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-06-08T12:28:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"7b98aaa1efd4b3d627f50f192d55a352d8250d983029845a802f2ff5fc83ade1","abstract_canon_sha256":"6e755fe4c06dfb36f2426d036175d728d550870887a0c8c15d017afb8a54b77e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:58.702551Z","signature_b64":"nhrpDZSJmCHaBxxymsB96FhdJKNBmsHQVxnfvJmH18V6G33UP9sZj07z3CmCCVvQLlFrC+GlCqfPxoPx5UVwDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d92cc1d7721edcea6eac0b9ef92cb0c8fa8242567c620bb390d9b5758faf359c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:58.701994Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:58.701994Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Theorem-of-Thought: A Multi-Agent Framework for Abductive, Deductive, and Inductive Reasoning in Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Erchin Serpedin, Hasan Kurban, Khalid Qaraqe, Samir Abdaljalil","submitted_at":"2025-06-08T12:28:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance across natural language reasoning tasks, yet their reasoning processes remain brittle and difficult to interpret. Prompting techniques like Chain-of-Thought (CoT) enhance reliability by eliciting intermediate reasoning steps or aggregating multiple outputs. However, they lack mechanisms for enforcing logical structure and assessing internal coherence. We introduce Theorem-of-Thought (ToTh), a novel framework that models reasoning as collaboration among three parallel agents, each simulating a distinct mode of inference: abductive, dedu"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.07106","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.07106/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.07106","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:58.702054+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.07106v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:58.702054+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.07106","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:58.702054+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3EWMDV3SD3OO","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:58.702054+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VM","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:58.702054+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3EWMDV3S","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:58.702054+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.19078","citing_title":"GraphMind: Theorem Selection and Conclusion Generation Framework with Dynamic GNN for LLM Reasoning","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VMBOPPSLFQZD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VMBOPPSLFQZD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VMBOPPSLFQZD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VMBOPPSLFQZD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3EWMDV3S"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VMBOPPSLFQZD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VMBOPPSLFQZD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3EWMDV3S","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.07106&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VMBOPPSLFQZD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VMBOPPSLFQZD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VMBOPPSLFQZD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VMBOPPSLFQZD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VMBOPPSLFQZD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VMBOPPSLFQZD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3EWMDV3SD3OOU3VMBOPPSLFQZD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:58.702054+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:45:58.702054+00:00"}