{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:3FN5NO7KTIUICW65IA2WVAU3EV","short_pith_number":"pith:3FN5NO7K","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d95bd6bbea9a28815bdd40356a829b2543a2d643cc0e686ee08dd18ce1b964f0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2010.10999","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Is Retriever Merely an Approximator of Reader?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Minjoon Seo, Sohee Yang","submitted_at":"2020-10-21T13:40:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"The state of the art in open-domain question answering (QA) relies on an efficient retriever that drastically reduces the search space for the expensive reader. A rather overlooked question in the community is the relationship between the retriever and the reader, and in particular, if the whole purpose of the retriever is just a fast approximation for the reader. Our empirical evidence indicates that the answer is no, and that the reader and the retriever are complementary to each other even in terms of accuracy only. We make a careful conjecture that the architectural constraint of the retri"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2010.10999","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2020-10-21T13:40:15Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"5e29bc22c692ec81f3579a00d9e1cf6562600079beec0ba348ade162f547ea93","abstract_canon_sha256":"8be6aed3140a233b1a448244eccc1f16ede8424545d1a3321a2bedf1afd50851"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:58.280833Z","signature_b64":"xYvMmd9QIqjvMhyPDqbM+wPYt/+nPk4ThSwCWBHxSS+hk8Z6m+IYbmx53yQbCdkP+SdUQOKB8HEV7nKU3KPDBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d95bd6bbea9a28815bdd40356a829b2543a2d643cc0e686ee08dd18ce1b964f0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:58.280391Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:58.280391Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Is Retriever Merely an Approximator of Reader?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Minjoon Seo, Sohee Yang","submitted_at":"2020-10-21T13:40:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"The state of the art in open-domain question answering (QA) relies on an efficient retriever that drastically reduces the search space for the expensive reader. A rather overlooked question in the community is the relationship between the retriever and the reader, and in particular, if the whole purpose of the retriever is just a fast approximation for the reader. Our empirical evidence indicates that the answer is no, and that the reader and the retriever are complementary to each other even in terms of accuracy only. We make a careful conjecture that the architectural constraint of the retri"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2010.10999","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2010.10999/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2010.10999","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:58.280454+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2010.10999v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:58.280454+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2010.10999","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:58.280454+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3FN5NO7KTIUI","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:58.280454+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3FN5NO7KTIUICW65","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:58.280454+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3FN5NO7K","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:58.280454+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2208.03299","citing_title":"Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Models","ref_index":104,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2112.09118","citing_title":"Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learning","ref_index":178,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3FN5NO7KTIUICW65IA2WVAU3EV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3FN5NO7KTIUICW65IA2WVAU3EV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3FN5NO7KTIUICW65IA2WVAU3EV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3FN5NO7KTIUICW65IA2WVAU3EV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3FN5NO7K"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3FN5NO7KTIUICW65IA2WVAU3EV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3FN5NO7KTIUICW65IA2WVAU3EV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3FN5NO7K","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2010.10999&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3FN5NO7KTIUICW65IA2WVAU3EV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3FN5NO7KTIUICW65IA2WVAU3EV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3FN5NO7KTIUICW65IA2WVAU3EV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3FN5NO7KTIUICW65IA2WVAU3EV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3FN5NO7KTIUICW65IA2WVAU3EV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3FN5NO7KTIUICW65IA2WVAU3EV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3FN5NO7KTIUICW65IA2WVAU3EV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:58.280454+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:44:58.280454+00:00"}