{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGMBNURGLOY2Z","short_pith_number":"pith:3JG4PNFN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"da4dc7b4addf33d464cc0b69132dd8d65c40e4d6ec27b8b95bc0e32f1319ab07","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.16738","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Inducing Group Fairness in Prompt-Based Language Model Decisions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Ahmad Beirami, Ananth Balashankar, Flavien Prost, James Atwood, Nino Scherrer, Preethi Lahoti","submitted_at":"2024-06-24T15:45:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Classifiers are used throughout industry to enforce policies, ranging from the detection of toxic content to age-appropriate content filtering. While these classifiers serve important functions, it is also essential that they are built in ways that minimize unfair biases for users.\n  One such fairness consideration is called group fairness, which desires that different sub-population of users receive equal treatment. This is a well-studied problem in the context of 'classical' classifiers. However, the emergence of prompt-based language model (LM) decision making has created new opportunities "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.16738","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2024-06-24T15:45:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"ad2f0a1294cbf858e7b4a06a0fd7aa633c88eeeab3281305cfed1273e296587d","abstract_canon_sha256":"67fa1ea6b403eeab919354ccc492a858ecfa5447cab91e259a4c96ec0e0a6add"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:08.074835Z","signature_b64":"qaR12e4wy00FbWyjKTacmQXmlo7TH6FrsdtuEOc2Ck8uwyRTZ2g8Ee4G51yjRhlhnVV2xQF+bHh57AavsBqHBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"da4dc7b4addf33d464cc0b69132dd8d65c40e4d6ec27b8b95bc0e32f1319ab07","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:08.074328Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:08.074328Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Inducing Group Fairness in Prompt-Based Language Model Decisions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Ahmad Beirami, Ananth Balashankar, Flavien Prost, James Atwood, Nino Scherrer, Preethi Lahoti","submitted_at":"2024-06-24T15:45:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Classifiers are used throughout industry to enforce policies, ranging from the detection of toxic content to age-appropriate content filtering. While these classifiers serve important functions, it is also essential that they are built in ways that minimize unfair biases for users.\n  One such fairness consideration is called group fairness, which desires that different sub-population of users receive equal treatment. This is a well-studied problem in the context of 'classical' classifiers. However, the emergence of prompt-based language model (LM) decision making has created new opportunities "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.16738","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.16738/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.16738","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:08.074397+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.16738v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:08.074397+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.16738","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:08.074397+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3JG4PNFN34Z5","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:08.074397+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGM","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:08.074397+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3JG4PNFN","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:08.074397+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.21587","citing_title":"A Cross-Cultural Comparison of LLM-based Public Opinion Simulation: Evaluating Chinese and U.S. Models on Diverse Societies","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGMBNURGLOY2Z","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGMBNURGLOY2Z.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGMBNURGLOY2Z/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGMBNURGLOY2Z/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3JG4PNFN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGMBNURGLOY2Z","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGMBNURGLOY2Z.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3JG4PNFN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.16738&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGMBNURGLOY2Z/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGMBNURGLOY2Z/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGMBNURGLOY2Z/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGMBNURGLOY2Z/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGMBNURGLOY2Z/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGMBNURGLOY2Z/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3JG4PNFN34Z5IZGMBNURGLOY2Z/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:08.074397+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:08.074397+00:00"}