{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3RXJOP6PVTXS","short_pith_number":"pith:3KMXTPK3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"da9979bd5b5c299f2371ba5cff3eb3bca7e85960563c302392400a5203471eba","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2210.13420","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Twitter Users' Behavioral Response to Toxic Replies","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Ana Aleksandric, Sayak Saha Roy, Shirin Nilizadeh","submitted_at":"2022-10-24T17:36:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"Online toxic attacks, such as harassment, trolling, and hate speech have been linked to an increase in offline violence and negative psychological effects on victims. In this paper, we studied the impact of toxicity on users' online behavior. We collected a sample of 79.8k Twitter conversations. Then, through a longitudinal study, for nine weeks, we tracked and compared the behavioral reactions of authors, who were toxicity victims, with those who were not. We found that toxicity victims show a combination of the following behavioral reactions: avoidance, revenge, countermeasures, and negotiat"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2210.13420","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SI","submitted_at":"2022-10-24T17:36:58Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"1b8d4edffcd8db8577f766aaef3fecc2603b99d8be53d2da57e596559de4d35b","abstract_canon_sha256":"9b2f73e2bb6a42d21896b52ecda1301f663323d35bc0501b786ae2e26b819799"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:45.242849Z","signature_b64":"XW8X/mN0P8STE5CQ1XvMXXo5qaKW9Fw2uUcwKIqKx1wRFFh9uIdlWqICxslvd8gGToLe7TbDwI6yAs6kcAgOBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"da9979bd5b5c299f2371ba5cff3eb3bca7e85960563c302392400a5203471eba","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:45.242391Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:45.242391Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Twitter Users' Behavioral Response to Toxic Replies","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Ana Aleksandric, Sayak Saha Roy, Shirin Nilizadeh","submitted_at":"2022-10-24T17:36:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"Online toxic attacks, such as harassment, trolling, and hate speech have been linked to an increase in offline violence and negative psychological effects on victims. In this paper, we studied the impact of toxicity on users' online behavior. We collected a sample of 79.8k Twitter conversations. Then, through a longitudinal study, for nine weeks, we tracked and compared the behavioral reactions of authors, who were toxicity victims, with those who were not. We found that toxicity victims show a combination of the following behavioral reactions: avoidance, revenge, countermeasures, and negotiat"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2210.13420","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2210.13420/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2210.13420","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:45.242450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2210.13420v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:45.242450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2210.13420","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:45.242450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3KMXTPK3LQUZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:45.242450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3R","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:45.242450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3KMXTPK3","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:45.242450+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.04693","citing_title":"Cracking the Code: Enhancing Implicit Hate Speech Detection through Coding Classification","ref_index":2022,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3RXJOP6PVTXS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3RXJOP6PVTXS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3RXJOP6PVTXS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3RXJOP6PVTXS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3KMXTPK3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3RXJOP6PVTXS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3RXJOP6PVTXS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3KMXTPK3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2210.13420&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3RXJOP6PVTXS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3RXJOP6PVTXS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3RXJOP6PVTXS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3RXJOP6PVTXS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3RXJOP6PVTXS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3RXJOP6PVTXS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3KMXTPK3LQUZ6I3RXJOP6PVTXS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:45.242450+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:09:45.242450+00:00"}