{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:3L7WU6I5MWUI77P6X4XV5LOFCK","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"d2bb3f46d5c78597b6faca84b545950e893389034ab5799aa676e64172fe33b0","cross_cats_sorted":[],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-04-13T17:31:14Z","title_canon_sha256":"0d7e4c0dec793707ae9f649c25a3466843b3f33c405700088a4ca75fe2fdfe9c"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2604.11759","kind":"arxiv","version":2}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2604.11759","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:15Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2604.11759v2","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:15Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2604.11759","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:15Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3L7WU6I5MWUI","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:15Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3L7WU6I5MWUI77P6","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:15Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3L7WU6I5","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:15Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:640a68303b862b4543fbd63fd7ab295b02e1dcb765ce2aef02ee4b3370456cd7","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:15Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"the ceiling on organizational AI is not retrieval fidelity but epistemic fidelity--the system's ability to represent commitment strength, contradiction status, and organizational ignorance as computable properties."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"That the added epistemic metadata and the Knowledge Gravity Engine can be maintained at acceptable cost in real organizations and that the claimed convergence and quality gains survive when token budgets are equalized."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"OIDA adds typed knowledge objects, decay-based importance scores, contradiction edges, and an inverse-decay QUESTION primitive for ignorance to raise epistemic fidelity beyond retrieval."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Organizational AI is limited by missing epistemic structure in knowledge rather than by retrieval quality alone."}],"snapshot_sha256":"08ba3846fe20fea73eb9506813b9816e696714d53286f24b2a5ef203e9afb007"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"integrity":{"available":true,"clean":true,"detectors_run":[],"endpoint":"/pith/2604.11759/integrity.json","findings":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938","summary":{"advisory":0,"by_detector":{},"critical":0,"informational":0}},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"Organizational knowledge used by AI agents typically lacks epistemic structure: retrieval systems surface semantically relevant content without distinguishing binding decisions from abandoned hypotheses, contested claims from settled ones, or known facts from unresolved questions. We argue that the ceiling on organizational AI is not retrieval fidelity but \\emph{epistemic} fidelity--the system's ability to represent commitment strength, contradiction status, and organizational ignorance as computable properties.\n  We present OIDA, a framework that structures organizational knowledge as typed K","authors_text":"Carlo Ferrero, Federico Bottino, Nicholas Dosio, Pierfrancesco Beneventano","cross_cats":[],"headline":"Organizational AI is limited by missing epistemic structure in knowledge rather than by retrieval quality alone.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-04-13T17:31:14Z","title":"Retrieval Is Not Enough: Why Organizational AI Needs Epistemic Infrastructure"},"references":{"count":0,"internal_anchors":0,"resolved_work":0,"sample":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2604.11759","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-10T14:54:20.606297Z","id":"7c3d3c6a-8ab3-48df-8a37-6ebe842b6bd8","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"OIDA adds typed knowledge objects, decay-based importance scores, contradiction edges, and an inverse-decay QUESTION primitive for ignorance to raise epistemic fidelity beyond retrieval.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Organizational AI is limited by missing epistemic structure in knowledge rather than by retrieval quality alone.","strongest_claim":"the ceiling on organizational AI is not retrieval fidelity but epistemic fidelity--the system's ability to represent commitment strength, contradiction status, and organizational ignorance as computable properties.","weakest_assumption":"That the added epistemic metadata and the Knowledge Gravity Engine can be maintained at acceptable cost in real organizations and that the claimed convergence and quality gains survive when token budgets are equalized."}},"verdict_id":"7c3d3c6a-8ab3-48df-8a37-6ebe842b6bd8"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:8c960743e640ddcfd678b0f0085fd9eefe208a8c1a3e778704d4d59783c3f519","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:15Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"d2bb3f46d5c78597b6faca84b545950e893389034ab5799aa676e64172fe33b0","cross_cats_sorted":[],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-04-13T17:31:14Z","title_canon_sha256":"0d7e4c0dec793707ae9f649c25a3466843b3f33c405700088a4ca75fe2fdfe9c"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2604.11759","kind":"arxiv","version":2}},"canonical_sha256":"daff6a791d65a88ffdfebf2f5eadc512a28ae985574813c619893629f2c15c8b","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"daff6a791d65a88ffdfebf2f5eadc512a28ae985574813c619893629f2c15c8b","first_computed_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:15.187166Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:15.187166Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"whZY5Tu08RV8oyWDGDIzsbjH7yR1V8etWdkJYZsHsXMRQuvs0H94MU6NLf/tW7n0W+CG+d+U93kG/jmGfucTAw==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:15.187878Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2604.11759","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":2}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:8c960743e640ddcfd678b0f0085fd9eefe208a8c1a3e778704d4d59783c3f519","sha256:640a68303b862b4543fbd63fd7ab295b02e1dcb765ce2aef02ee4b3370456cd7"],"state_sha256":"aaf147340eb644525f639af5d429368409b6074cd14c39d98bdc2f0ed237531b"}