{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBTDPZ42IHMRC","short_pith_number":"pith:3MBC2NXA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"db022d36e0c0adb59c331bf3cd20ec889343446f239c5420211c6f037dc8dfd0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1612.08583","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Proposal to Extend Expected Utility in a Quantum Probabilistic Framework","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"q-fin.EC","authors_text":"Diederik Aerts, Emmanuel Haven, Sandro Sozzo","submitted_at":"2016-12-27T11:43:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Expected utility theory (EUT) is widely used in economic theory. However, its subjective probability formulation, first elaborated by Savage, is linked to Ellsberg-like paradoxes and ambiguity aversion. This has led various scholars to work out non-Bayesian extensions of EUT which cope with its paradoxes and incorporate attitudes toward ambiguity. A variant of the Ellsberg paradox, recently proposed by Mark Machina and confirmed experimentally, challenges existing non-Bayesian models of decision-making under uncertainty. Relying on a decade of research which has successfully applied the formal"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1612.08583","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"q-fin.EC","submitted_at":"2016-12-27T11:43:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"cb8afd35f899dfec6efb0c636b6d82121ce6c6f7681fa41b811996363303ead7","abstract_canon_sha256":"0c2a4c8a0f7a522542029ada1353b61e78cedac32418a0b70e20e6d8ba7959c1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:54:26.958948Z","signature_b64":"fQS4TBpSa5xnNXXVhotgJn2jtIp33Is+VzMedW6SkzpsUqw9gc41/AkHfVUFpTVIax79TH5Lk0S1HfNr9S5hBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"db022d36e0c0adb59c331bf3cd20ec889343446f239c5420211c6f037dc8dfd0","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:54:26.958288Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:54:26.958288Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Proposal to Extend Expected Utility in a Quantum Probabilistic Framework","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"q-fin.EC","authors_text":"Diederik Aerts, Emmanuel Haven, Sandro Sozzo","submitted_at":"2016-12-27T11:43:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Expected utility theory (EUT) is widely used in economic theory. However, its subjective probability formulation, first elaborated by Savage, is linked to Ellsberg-like paradoxes and ambiguity aversion. This has led various scholars to work out non-Bayesian extensions of EUT which cope with its paradoxes and incorporate attitudes toward ambiguity. A variant of the Ellsberg paradox, recently proposed by Mark Machina and confirmed experimentally, challenges existing non-Bayesian models of decision-making under uncertainty. Relying on a decade of research which has successfully applied the formal"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1612.08583","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1612.08583","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:54:26.958388+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1612.08583v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:54:26.958388+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1612.08583","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:54:26.958388+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3MBC2NXAYCW3","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:55.572404+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBT","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:55.572404+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3MBC2NXA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:55.572404+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBTDPZ42IHMRC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBTDPZ42IHMRC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBTDPZ42IHMRC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBTDPZ42IHMRC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3MBC2NXA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBTDPZ42IHMRC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBTDPZ42IHMRC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3MBC2NXA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1612.08583&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBTDPZ42IHMRC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBTDPZ42IHMRC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBTDPZ42IHMRC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBTDPZ42IHMRC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBTDPZ42IHMRC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBTDPZ42IHMRC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3MBC2NXAYCW3LHBTDPZ42IHMRC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:54:26.958388+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:54:26.958388+00:00"}