{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:3N6E624KNFL6JY47XLM5P7NGVF","short_pith_number":"pith:3N6E624K","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"db7c4f6b8a6957e4e39fbad9d7fda6a9543014d79f04a1c1173429133ca6548b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.02150","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Rates","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Giuseppe Russo Latona, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Robert West, Tim R. Davidson, Veniamin Veselovsky","submitted_at":"2024-05-03T14:56:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Journals and conferences worry that peer reviews assisted by artificial intelligence (AI), in particular, large language models (LLMs), may negatively influence the validity and fairness of the peer-review system, a cornerstone of modern science. In this work, we address this concern with a quasi-experimental study of the prevalence and impact of AI-assisted peer reviews in the context of the 2024 International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), a large and prestigious machine-learning conference. Our contributions are threefold. Firstly, we obtain a lower bound for the prevalence "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.02150","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-05-03T14:56:43Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"2476513906d3f2e0c94b506f23c4599459868e1a65b7564d7afc51576e8a8c6f","abstract_canon_sha256":"f35e7ec20f02be742cddceca0182dd379503191421b2ae1b63459d5bbf7b9dbc"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:07.442982Z","signature_b64":"a129hZfGxp9BBs0JEGfoaAlb9nzKEko1D1GarwzBJT3d5K5vZTF5GSANr6aPvisoiQFu4WmahJcaH5U6dS2sDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"db7c4f6b8a6957e4e39fbad9d7fda6a9543014d79f04a1c1173429133ca6548b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:07.442592Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:07.442592Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Rates","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Giuseppe Russo Latona, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Robert West, Tim R. Davidson, Veniamin Veselovsky","submitted_at":"2024-05-03T14:56:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Journals and conferences worry that peer reviews assisted by artificial intelligence (AI), in particular, large language models (LLMs), may negatively influence the validity and fairness of the peer-review system, a cornerstone of modern science. In this work, we address this concern with a quasi-experimental study of the prevalence and impact of AI-assisted peer reviews in the context of the 2024 International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), a large and prestigious machine-learning conference. Our contributions are threefold. Firstly, we obtain a lower bound for the prevalence "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.02150","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.02150/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.02150","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:07.442643+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.02150v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:07.442643+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.02150","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:07.442643+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3N6E624KNFL6","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:07.442643+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3N6E624KNFL6JY47","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:07.442643+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3N6E624K","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:07.442643+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":10,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.25057","citing_title":"LLM-Based Scientific Peer Review: Methods, Benchmarks, and Reliability Challenges","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.20897","citing_title":"PeerCheck: Enhancing LLM-Generated Academic Reviews Towards Human-Level Quality","ref_index":32,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.27386","citing_title":"Agentic Publication Protocol: An Attempt to Modernize Scientific Publication","ref_index":52,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27204","citing_title":"GraphReview: Scientific Paper Evaluation via LLM-based Graph Evidence Expansion","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.18661","citing_title":"AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide","ref_index":164,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.20405","citing_title":"ChatGPT: Excellent Paper! Accept It. Editor: Imposter Found! Review Rejected","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.16659","citing_title":"LLMs learn scientific taste from institutional traces across the social sciences","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.26506","citing_title":"SafeReview: Defending LLM-based Review Systems Against Adversarial Hidden Prompts","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19578","citing_title":"Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.13940","citing_title":"AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3N6E624KNFL6JY47XLM5P7NGVF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3N6E624KNFL6JY47XLM5P7NGVF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3N6E624KNFL6JY47XLM5P7NGVF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3N6E624KNFL6JY47XLM5P7NGVF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3N6E624K"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3N6E624KNFL6JY47XLM5P7NGVF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3N6E624KNFL6JY47XLM5P7NGVF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3N6E624K","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.02150&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3N6E624KNFL6JY47XLM5P7NGVF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3N6E624KNFL6JY47XLM5P7NGVF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3N6E624KNFL6JY47XLM5P7NGVF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3N6E624KNFL6JY47XLM5P7NGVF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3N6E624KNFL6JY47XLM5P7NGVF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3N6E624KNFL6JY47XLM5P7NGVF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3N6E624KNFL6JY47XLM5P7NGVF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:07.442643+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:15:07.442643+00:00"}