{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDPETHDVTJF6E","short_pith_number":"pith:3NJANQ2L","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"db5206c34bb9670b986f24ce3acd25f12c0f0aa570ef21ceed747a0af985ab82","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1606.03605","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"RG Domain Wall for the General su(2) Coset Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Marian Stanishkov","submitted_at":"2016-06-11T14:52:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider a RG flow in a general su(2) coset model induced by the least relevant field. This is done using two different approaches. We first compute the mixing coefficients of certain fields in the UV and IR theories using a conformal perturbation theory. The necessary structure constants are computed. The same coefficients can be calculated using the RG domain wall construction of Gaiotto. We compute the corresponding one-point functions and show that the two approaches give the same result in the leading order."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1606.03605","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2016-06-11T14:52:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c91499ab9d11a35d965c7b4eeac8cda6dd23e4d6ebb94878a7faac488b632056","abstract_canon_sha256":"3835c39505c77efb98fe9a1cc75480973dcaf89e4e89259f208efdd3b3d9c8ff"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:18.663976Z","signature_b64":"KaAaNTFjy9CR9qismiG/VGdw2D+idrjgJbC9iB1hbD9Iu1zNJUNdjvE4602h1Y5hzgPnYMEWUBbscWJoG5GgCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"db5206c34bb9670b986f24ce3acd25f12c0f0aa570ef21ceed747a0af985ab82","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:18.663580Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:18.663580Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"RG Domain Wall for the General su(2) Coset Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Marian Stanishkov","submitted_at":"2016-06-11T14:52:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider a RG flow in a general su(2) coset model induced by the least relevant field. This is done using two different approaches. We first compute the mixing coefficients of certain fields in the UV and IR theories using a conformal perturbation theory. The necessary structure constants are computed. The same coefficients can be calculated using the RG domain wall construction of Gaiotto. We compute the corresponding one-point functions and show that the two approaches give the same result in the leading order."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1606.03605","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1606.03605","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:18.663637+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1606.03605v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:18.663637+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1606.03605","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:18.663637+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3NJANQ2LXFTQ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:55.572404+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDP","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:55.572404+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3NJANQ2L","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:55.572404+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":4,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.08639","citing_title":"Extending fusion rules with finite subgroups: A general construction of $Z_{N}$ extended conformal field theories and their orbifoldings","ref_index":193,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.07734","citing_title":"Characterizing gapped phases by smeared boundary conformal field theories: Duality in unusual ordering with spontaneously broken generalized symmetries","ref_index":294,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.23155","citing_title":"Homomorphism, substructure, and ideal: Elementary but rigorous aspects of renormalization group or hierarchical structure of topological orders","ref_index":206,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.11059","citing_title":"Generalizing quantum dimensions: Symmetry-based classification of local pseudo-Hermitian systems and the corresponding domain walls","ref_index":203,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.07734","citing_title":"Characterizing gapped phases by smeared boundary conformal field theories: Duality in unusual ordering with spontaneously broken generalized symmetries","ref_index":284,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDPETHDVTJF6E","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDPETHDVTJF6E.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDPETHDVTJF6E/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDPETHDVTJF6E/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3NJANQ2L"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDPETHDVTJF6E","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDPETHDVTJF6E.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3NJANQ2L","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1606.03605&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDPETHDVTJF6E/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDPETHDVTJF6E/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDPETHDVTJF6E/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDPETHDVTJF6E/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDPETHDVTJF6E/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDPETHDVTJF6E/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3NJANQ2LXFTQXGDPETHDVTJF6E/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:18.663637+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:18.663637+00:00"}